轨道工程中列车路线决策建模

Basil Schmid , Felix Becker , Joseph Molloy , Kay W. Axhausen , Jochen Lüdering , Julian Hagen , Annette Blome
{"title":"轨道工程中列车路线决策建模","authors":"Basil Schmid ,&nbsp;Felix Becker ,&nbsp;Joseph Molloy ,&nbsp;Kay W. Axhausen ,&nbsp;Jochen Lüdering ,&nbsp;Julian Hagen ,&nbsp;Annette Blome","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To better understand the choice behavior of train route schedulers and to predict their choices for optimizing the annual construction schedule, prospective data for 2020 on train route decisions are analyzed using discrete choice models and machine learning classifiers. The choice alternatives include (i) partial cancellation of the train schedule at the start, (ii) in the middle or (iii) at the end of the itinerary of the train service, (iv) detour and (v) delay/ahead of time, and are modeled using 39 train-, construction site-, and infrastructure variables. The top nine attributes account for about 80% of variable importance, including the travel time from the departure station to the construction site, total or line closure, travel time from the construction site to the terminus, length of the train and effective line capacity.</p><p>The models are tested for 2021 and 2022 to verify whether they can be used to forecast choices in the following years. While Random Forest performs best in terms of prediction accuracy (2021: 60.8%; 2022: 58.6%), the improvements of about 6%-points compared to the Mixed Logit model are modest. Results indicate that a substantial amount of unobserved construction site heterogeneity is present, which Random Forest cannot capture either.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000221/pdfft?md5=d0461bebf41839bca579a56ca384d9bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2210970622000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling train route decisions during track works\",\"authors\":\"Basil Schmid ,&nbsp;Felix Becker ,&nbsp;Joseph Molloy ,&nbsp;Kay W. Axhausen ,&nbsp;Jochen Lüdering ,&nbsp;Julian Hagen ,&nbsp;Annette Blome\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To better understand the choice behavior of train route schedulers and to predict their choices for optimizing the annual construction schedule, prospective data for 2020 on train route decisions are analyzed using discrete choice models and machine learning classifiers. The choice alternatives include (i) partial cancellation of the train schedule at the start, (ii) in the middle or (iii) at the end of the itinerary of the train service, (iv) detour and (v) delay/ahead of time, and are modeled using 39 train-, construction site-, and infrastructure variables. The top nine attributes account for about 80% of variable importance, including the travel time from the departure station to the construction site, total or line closure, travel time from the construction site to the terminus, length of the train and effective line capacity.</p><p>The models are tested for 2021 and 2022 to verify whether they can be used to forecast choices in the following years. While Random Forest performs best in terms of prediction accuracy (2021: 60.8%; 2022: 58.6%), the improvements of about 6%-points compared to the Mixed Logit model are modest. Results indicate that a substantial amount of unobserved construction site heterogeneity is present, which Random Forest cannot capture either.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000221/pdfft?md5=d0461bebf41839bca579a56ca384d9bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2210970622000221-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970622000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了更好地理解列车路线调度者的选择行为,并预测他们优化年度建设计划的选择,使用离散选择模型和机器学习分类器分析了2020年列车路线决策的前瞻性数据。备选方案包括:(i)在列车服务行程开始时部分取消列车时刻表,(ii)在行程中间或(iii)在行程结束时,(iv)绕行和(v)延迟/提前,并使用39个列车、建筑工地和基础设施变量进行建模。前九个属性约占80%的可变重要性,包括从发站到施工现场的旅行时间,总或线路关闭,从施工现场到终点站的旅行时间,列车长度和有效线路容量。这些模型将在2021年和2022年进行测试,以验证它们是否可以用于预测未来几年的选择。而随机森林在预测精度方面表现最好(2021年:60.8%;2022年:58.6%),与混合Logit模型相比,约6%的改进是适度的。结果表明,大量未观察到的建筑工地异质性存在,随机森林也无法捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling train route decisions during track works

To better understand the choice behavior of train route schedulers and to predict their choices for optimizing the annual construction schedule, prospective data for 2020 on train route decisions are analyzed using discrete choice models and machine learning classifiers. The choice alternatives include (i) partial cancellation of the train schedule at the start, (ii) in the middle or (iii) at the end of the itinerary of the train service, (iv) detour and (v) delay/ahead of time, and are modeled using 39 train-, construction site-, and infrastructure variables. The top nine attributes account for about 80% of variable importance, including the travel time from the departure station to the construction site, total or line closure, travel time from the construction site to the terminus, length of the train and effective line capacity.

The models are tested for 2021 and 2022 to verify whether they can be used to forecast choices in the following years. While Random Forest performs best in terms of prediction accuracy (2021: 60.8%; 2022: 58.6%), the improvements of about 6%-points compared to the Mixed Logit model are modest. Results indicate that a substantial amount of unobserved construction site heterogeneity is present, which Random Forest cannot capture either.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A MILP model to improve the robustness of a railway timetable by retiming and rerouting in a complex bottleneck area A decomposition approach to solve the individual railway crew Re-planning problem A Bi-objective model and a branch-and-price-and-cut solution method for the railroad blocking problem in hazardous material transportation Relationships between service quality and customer satisfaction in rail freight transportation: A structural equation modeling approach The evaluation of competition effect on rail fares using the difference-in-difference method through symmetric and lagged spans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1