书评:UPINDER SINGH，古德里，德里:牛津大学出版社，1999年，第114页

Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI:10.1177/001946460203900415

S. Kumar

{"title":"书评:UPINDER SINGH，古德里，德里:牛津大学出版社，1999年，第114页","authors":"S. Kumar","doi":"10.1177/001946460203900415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"she has structured her arguments not as a contribution to scholarly dialogue on the history of Indian Muslims in this period, but simply as an answer to polemicists who have seen modern Indian history as shaped by a monolithic Muslim community driven by communalism. Unfortunately, given its length and mass of detail, this book is no more likely to succeed as an intervention in polemical debate than as an effective contribution to scholarly dialogue","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Reviews : UPINDER SINGH, Ancient Delhi, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 114\",\"authors\":\"S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/001946460203900415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"she has structured her arguments not as a contribution to scholarly dialogue on the history of Indian Muslims in this period, but simply as an answer to polemicists who have seen modern Indian history as shaped by a monolithic Muslim community driven by communalism. Unfortunately, given its length and mass of detail, this book is no more likely to succeed as an intervention in polemical debate than as an effective contribution to scholarly dialogue\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460203900415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001946460203900415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

她的论点并不是为了对这一时期印度穆斯林历史的学术对话做出贡献，而只是为了回答那些认为现代印度历史是由一个由社群主义驱动的单一穆斯林社区塑造的辩论家。不幸的是，考虑到它的篇幅和大量的细节，这本书与其说是对学术对话的有效贡献，不如说是对争论性辩论的干预

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

Book Reviews : UPINDER SINGH, Ancient Delhi, Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 114

she has structured her arguments not as a contribution to scholarly dialogue on the history of Indian Muslims in this period, but simply as an answer to polemicists who have seen modern Indian history as shaped by a monolithic Muslim community driven by communalism. Unfortunately, given its length and mass of detail, this book is no more likely to succeed as an intervention in polemical debate than as an effective contribution to scholarly dialogue

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助