缩略语与单字并举:塞尔维亚语缩略语

Tvrtko Prćić
{"title":"缩略语与单字并举:塞尔维亚语缩略语","authors":"Tvrtko Prćić","doi":"10.2298/jfi2202429p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with forms like CeSID, RTS and GSP in Serbian, one type of words made by shortening. In spite of the fact that in domestic theory and practice they are traditionally called and considered abbreviations, most of these forms in practice behave as if they were words. Starting from this pragmatic point and main hypothesis that what is involved here are hybrid lexical units, part abbreviations, part words, which therefore should receive a different theoretical and methodological treatment and terminological designation - acronyms, the aim of the present article is to corroborate this basic premise by offering linguistically informed explication and authentic exemplification, from four interconnected angles: (1) twelve questions with answers concerning the status of these forms in the light of their actual behaviour in everyday writing and speech, (2) form- and content-related properties which make these forms abbreviations in one way, words in the other, and which precise properties determine them as acronyms, (3) a pragmatic-functional typology of acronyms, and (4) theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the proposed interpretation of the nature of acronyms.","PeriodicalId":30153,"journal":{"name":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abbreviations and words at the same time: Acronyms in Serbian\",\"authors\":\"Tvrtko Prćić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/jfi2202429p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with forms like CeSID, RTS and GSP in Serbian, one type of words made by shortening. In spite of the fact that in domestic theory and practice they are traditionally called and considered abbreviations, most of these forms in practice behave as if they were words. Starting from this pragmatic point and main hypothesis that what is involved here are hybrid lexical units, part abbreviations, part words, which therefore should receive a different theoretical and methodological treatment and terminological designation - acronyms, the aim of the present article is to corroborate this basic premise by offering linguistically informed explication and authentic exemplification, from four interconnected angles: (1) twelve questions with answers concerning the status of these forms in the light of their actual behaviour in everyday writing and speech, (2) form- and content-related properties which make these forms abbreviations in one way, words in the other, and which precise properties determine them as acronyms, (3) a pragmatic-functional typology of acronyms, and (4) theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the proposed interpretation of the nature of acronyms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juznoslovenski Filolog\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juznoslovenski Filolog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/jfi2202429p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/jfi2202429p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了塞尔维亚语中的CeSID、RTS和GSP等缩略语形式。尽管在国内理论和实践中,它们传统上被称为缩略语,并被认为是缩略语,但在实践中,这些形式中的大多数表现得好像它们是单词一样。从语用学的观点出发,从主要假设出发,这里涉及的是混合词汇单位,部分缩写,部分单词,因此应该得到不同的理论和方法处理和术语名称-缩写,本文的目的是通过从四个相互关联的角度提供语言学上的解释和真实的例证来证实这一基本前提:(1) 12个问题,根据这些形式在日常写作和讲话中的实际行为,回答这些形式的地位;(2)与形式和内容相关的属性,这些属性使这些形式在某种程度上是缩写,在另一种情况下是单词,并且哪些精确的属性决定了它们是缩写;(3)缩略语的语用功能类型学;(4)对缩略语性质的建议解释的理论、方法和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abbreviations and words at the same time: Acronyms in Serbian
This paper deals with forms like CeSID, RTS and GSP in Serbian, one type of words made by shortening. In spite of the fact that in domestic theory and practice they are traditionally called and considered abbreviations, most of these forms in practice behave as if they were words. Starting from this pragmatic point and main hypothesis that what is involved here are hybrid lexical units, part abbreviations, part words, which therefore should receive a different theoretical and methodological treatment and terminological designation - acronyms, the aim of the present article is to corroborate this basic premise by offering linguistically informed explication and authentic exemplification, from four interconnected angles: (1) twelve questions with answers concerning the status of these forms in the light of their actual behaviour in everyday writing and speech, (2) form- and content-related properties which make these forms abbreviations in one way, words in the other, and which precise properties determine them as acronyms, (3) a pragmatic-functional typology of acronyms, and (4) theoretical, methodological and practical implications of the proposed interpretation of the nature of acronyms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linguoculturological aspects of the lexeme cat in the Serbian language Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language The specificity of dialectal word formation - some methodological and other remarks An example of the variant suffixes -ica and -ka in feminatives derived from masculine words ending in -or and -ator Lexical factors in the allocation of unique morphemes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1