“我知道”、“你知道”和“我们知道”在小学生协作写作中的会话功能

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Classroom Discourse Pub Date : 2020-10-14 DOI:10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368
Anke Herder, J. Berenst, K. de Glopper, T. Koole
{"title":"“我知道”、“你知道”和“我们知道”在小学生协作写作中的会话功能","authors":"Anke Herder, J. Berenst, K. de Glopper, T. Koole","doi":"10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper discusses how primary school students, who are writing together in the context of inquiry learning, explicitly orient to knowing of oneself and others within the peer group. Using Conversation Analysis, we disclose the conversational functions of assertions holding ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’. First, students position themselves as knowledgeable, to (i) express a preannouncement of a proposal, (ii) respond to a request for information and (iii) reinforce an assertion with use of an evidential. Second, students claim equal epistemic access, as a response to an action that conveys epistemic authority of a peer. Third, students indicate shared knowledge with other participants, to (i) pursue agreement, (ii) check the epistemic status of a co-participant, (iii) reject a proposal for grounds of relevance and (iv) mark shared, newfound knowledge. The different practices are discussed in terms of epistemics in conversation and dialogic writing.","PeriodicalId":45350,"journal":{"name":"Classroom Discourse","volume":"105 1","pages":"1 - 31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children\",\"authors\":\"Anke Herder, J. Berenst, K. de Glopper, T. Koole\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper discusses how primary school students, who are writing together in the context of inquiry learning, explicitly orient to knowing of oneself and others within the peer group. Using Conversation Analysis, we disclose the conversational functions of assertions holding ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’. First, students position themselves as knowledgeable, to (i) express a preannouncement of a proposal, (ii) respond to a request for information and (iii) reinforce an assertion with use of an evidential. Second, students claim equal epistemic access, as a response to an action that conveys epistemic authority of a peer. Third, students indicate shared knowledge with other participants, to (i) pursue agreement, (ii) check the epistemic status of a co-participant, (iii) reject a proposal for grounds of relevance and (iv) mark shared, newfound knowledge. The different practices are discussed in terms of epistemics in conversation and dialogic writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classroom Discourse\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classroom Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classroom Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2020.1814368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本文讨论了在探究性学习背景下共同写作的小学生如何明确地定位于了解同伴群体中的自己和他人。通过会话分析,我们揭示了包含“我知道”、“你知道”和“我们知道”的断言的会话功能。首先,学生将自己定位为知识渊博的人,以(i)预先宣布一个提议,(ii)回应一个信息请求,(iii)用证据来强化一个断言。其次,学生要求平等的知识获取,作为对传达同伴知识权威的行为的回应。第三,学生指出与其他参与者共享的知识,以(i)寻求一致,(ii)检查共同参与者的认知状态,(iii)拒绝相关的建议,以及(iv)标记共享的新发现的知识。从对话和对话写作的认识论角度讨论了不同的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children
ABSTRACT This paper discusses how primary school students, who are writing together in the context of inquiry learning, explicitly orient to knowing of oneself and others within the peer group. Using Conversation Analysis, we disclose the conversational functions of assertions holding ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’. First, students position themselves as knowledgeable, to (i) express a preannouncement of a proposal, (ii) respond to a request for information and (iii) reinforce an assertion with use of an evidential. Second, students claim equal epistemic access, as a response to an action that conveys epistemic authority of a peer. Third, students indicate shared knowledge with other participants, to (i) pursue agreement, (ii) check the epistemic status of a co-participant, (iii) reject a proposal for grounds of relevance and (iv) mark shared, newfound knowledge. The different practices are discussed in terms of epistemics in conversation and dialogic writing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Classroom Discourse
Classroom Discourse EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Examining authorial agency in elementary children’s narratives Analysing educational dialogue around shared artefacts in technology-mediated contexts: a new coding framework The embodied nature of students’ engagement and participation during a total physical response activity Collaborative character searches in L2 Chinese peer writing: sequential design and object affordances Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: a discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1