准确的动态界面张力改善油藏工程实践

Taha M. Okasha, Mohammed Al Hamad, B. Sauerer, Wael Abdallah
{"title":"准确的动态界面张力改善油藏工程实践","authors":"Taha M. Okasha, Mohammed Al Hamad, B. Sauerer, Wael Abdallah","doi":"10.2118/204615-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Current reservoir simulators use interfacial tension (IFT) values derived from dead oil measurements at ambient conditions or predicted from literature correlations. IFT is highly dependent on temperature, pressure and fluid composition. Therefore, knowledge of the IFT value at reservoir conditions is essential for accurate reservoir fluid characterization. This study compares IFT values from dead and live oil measurements and the results of literature predicted values, thereby clearly showing the weakness of existing correlations when trying to predict crude oil IFT. A total of ten live oils was sampled for this study. Using the pendent drop technique, IFT was measured for each oil at different conditions: in the under-saturated region at reservoir pressure and temperature, in the saturated region at reservoir temperature, and for dead oil at ambient conditions. Basic PVT properties such as gas to oil ratio (GOR), gas and liquid composition, density, viscosity and molecular weight were also measured. The bubble point for each oil was identified to define the pressure step in the saturated region for extra IFT measurement. The equilibrium IFT values for the live oils were generally higher than for the corresponding dead oils. For oils where this general trend was not observed, contaminations were found in the crude samples. The use of current literature correlations does not allow to predict correct reservoir IFT. Therefore, this study provides accurate live IFT values for a variety of reservoir fluids and conditions in combination with live oil properties, highly beneficial to reservoir engineers, allowing better oil production planning.","PeriodicalId":11024,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate Live Interfacial Tension for Improved Reservoir Engineering Practices\",\"authors\":\"Taha M. Okasha, Mohammed Al Hamad, B. Sauerer, Wael Abdallah\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/204615-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Current reservoir simulators use interfacial tension (IFT) values derived from dead oil measurements at ambient conditions or predicted from literature correlations. IFT is highly dependent on temperature, pressure and fluid composition. Therefore, knowledge of the IFT value at reservoir conditions is essential for accurate reservoir fluid characterization. This study compares IFT values from dead and live oil measurements and the results of literature predicted values, thereby clearly showing the weakness of existing correlations when trying to predict crude oil IFT. A total of ten live oils was sampled for this study. Using the pendent drop technique, IFT was measured for each oil at different conditions: in the under-saturated region at reservoir pressure and temperature, in the saturated region at reservoir temperature, and for dead oil at ambient conditions. Basic PVT properties such as gas to oil ratio (GOR), gas and liquid composition, density, viscosity and molecular weight were also measured. The bubble point for each oil was identified to define the pressure step in the saturated region for extra IFT measurement. The equilibrium IFT values for the live oils were generally higher than for the corresponding dead oils. For oils where this general trend was not observed, contaminations were found in the crude samples. The use of current literature correlations does not allow to predict correct reservoir IFT. Therefore, this study provides accurate live IFT values for a variety of reservoir fluids and conditions in combination with live oil properties, highly beneficial to reservoir engineers, allowing better oil production planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/204615-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Wed, December 01, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204615-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的油藏模拟器使用的界面张力(IFT)值来自于环境条件下的死油测量值或根据文献相关性预测的值。IFT高度依赖于温度、压力和流体成分。因此,了解储层条件下的IFT值对于准确表征储层流体至关重要。本研究将死油和活油的IFT测量值与文献预测值的结果进行了比较,从而清楚地显示了在试图预测原油IFT时现有相关性的弱点。本研究共取样了10种活油。利用垂滴技术,在不同条件下测量了每种油的IFT:在油藏压力和温度下的欠饱和区,在油藏温度下的饱和区,以及在环境条件下的死油。还测量了PVT的基本性能,如气油比(GOR)、气液组成、密度、粘度和分子量。确定每种油的气泡点,以确定饱和区域的压力阶跃,以便进行额外的IFT测量。活油的平衡IFT值一般高于相应的死油。对于没有观察到这种总体趋势的油,在原油样品中发现了污染。使用当前的文献相关性不能预测正确的储层IFT。因此,该研究为各种油藏流体和条件提供了准确的实时IFT值,并结合了实时油的性质,这对油藏工程师非常有利,可以更好地制定石油生产计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accurate Live Interfacial Tension for Improved Reservoir Engineering Practices
Current reservoir simulators use interfacial tension (IFT) values derived from dead oil measurements at ambient conditions or predicted from literature correlations. IFT is highly dependent on temperature, pressure and fluid composition. Therefore, knowledge of the IFT value at reservoir conditions is essential for accurate reservoir fluid characterization. This study compares IFT values from dead and live oil measurements and the results of literature predicted values, thereby clearly showing the weakness of existing correlations when trying to predict crude oil IFT. A total of ten live oils was sampled for this study. Using the pendent drop technique, IFT was measured for each oil at different conditions: in the under-saturated region at reservoir pressure and temperature, in the saturated region at reservoir temperature, and for dead oil at ambient conditions. Basic PVT properties such as gas to oil ratio (GOR), gas and liquid composition, density, viscosity and molecular weight were also measured. The bubble point for each oil was identified to define the pressure step in the saturated region for extra IFT measurement. The equilibrium IFT values for the live oils were generally higher than for the corresponding dead oils. For oils where this general trend was not observed, contaminations were found in the crude samples. The use of current literature correlations does not allow to predict correct reservoir IFT. Therefore, this study provides accurate live IFT values for a variety of reservoir fluids and conditions in combination with live oil properties, highly beneficial to reservoir engineers, allowing better oil production planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Condensate Banking Removal Using Slow Release of In-Situ Energized Fluid Full-Field History-Matching of Commingling Stacked Reservoirs: A Case Study of an Oman Southern Asset Recovery Improvement Using Geological, Technical and Operational Factors of Field Development That Influence the Character of Inflow Profiles in Horizontal Laterals Unlocking Growth Opportunities Through Saturation Evaluation Behind Complex Completion by Applying State-of-Art Pulsed Neutron Technology Development of New Models to Determine the Rheological Parameters of Water-based Drilling Fluid Using Artificial Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1