反思与转移对动物科学本科学生知识的影响

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Experiential Education Pub Date : 2023-03-29 DOI:10.1177/10538259231159647
Bradley M. Coleman, J. C. Bunch, T. Roberts, G. Israel, A. Wysocki
{"title":"反思与转移对动物科学本科学生知识的影响","authors":"Bradley M. Coleman, J. C. Bunch, T. Roberts, G. Israel, A. Wysocki","doi":"10.1177/10538259231159647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Experiential learning is commonly used in postsecondary settings, especially in undergraduate, agricultural, and laboratory courses. However, a lack of attention has been paid by educators to critical components of experiential learning. Purpose: The effects of reflection mode (peer-verbal or written journal reflection) and transfer level (same, near, or far transfer) on students’ content knowledge were examined in a postsecondary, animal science, laboratory course. Methodology/Approach: A quasi-experimental, two-way, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized. This 2 × 3 factorial design was utilized to test the main and interaction effects of two independent variables (reflection mode and transfer level) on one dependent variable (content knowledge). A pretest score was included as a covariate to control for students’ prior knowledge. Findings/Conclusions: There was a significant interaction effect between the independent variables of reflection mode and transfer level on the dependent variable of content knowledge. Written reflection (when coupled with near transfer), and same transfer (when coupled with peer-verbal reflection), were statistically significant. Implication: Multiple modes of reflection and application can be used during experiential learning in order to achieve effective content knowledge gains. When experiential learning is planned and developed with intentionality, learners receive a valuable, educative experience.","PeriodicalId":46775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experiential Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Reflection and Transfer on Undergraduate Animal Science Students’ Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Bradley M. Coleman, J. C. Bunch, T. Roberts, G. Israel, A. Wysocki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538259231159647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Experiential learning is commonly used in postsecondary settings, especially in undergraduate, agricultural, and laboratory courses. However, a lack of attention has been paid by educators to critical components of experiential learning. Purpose: The effects of reflection mode (peer-verbal or written journal reflection) and transfer level (same, near, or far transfer) on students’ content knowledge were examined in a postsecondary, animal science, laboratory course. Methodology/Approach: A quasi-experimental, two-way, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized. This 2 × 3 factorial design was utilized to test the main and interaction effects of two independent variables (reflection mode and transfer level) on one dependent variable (content knowledge). A pretest score was included as a covariate to control for students’ prior knowledge. Findings/Conclusions: There was a significant interaction effect between the independent variables of reflection mode and transfer level on the dependent variable of content knowledge. Written reflection (when coupled with near transfer), and same transfer (when coupled with peer-verbal reflection), were statistically significant. Implication: Multiple modes of reflection and application can be used during experiential learning in order to achieve effective content knowledge gains. When experiential learning is planned and developed with intentionality, learners receive a valuable, educative experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experiential Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experiential Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231159647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experiential Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231159647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:体验式学习通常用于高等教育设置,特别是在本科,农业和实验课程。然而,教育工作者对体验式学习的关键组成部分缺乏关注。目的:考察反思方式(同伴口头或书面日记反思)和迁移水平(相同、近或远迁移)对高等院校动物科学实验课程学生内容知识的影响。方法学/方法:采用准实验、双向协方差分析(ANCOVA)。采用2 × 3因子设计检验两个自变量(反思模式和转移水平)对一个因变量(内容知识)的主效应和交互效应。前测分数作为协变量来控制学生的先验知识。结果/结论:反思方式和迁移水平这两个自变量对内容知识的因变量存在显著的交互作用。书面反思(当与近距离迁移相结合时)和相同的迁移(当与同伴语言反思相结合时)在统计学上是显著的。启示:体验式学习中可以采用多种反思和应用模式,以达到有效的内容知识获取。当体验式学习被有意地计划和发展时,学习者就会获得有价值的、有教育意义的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effects of Reflection and Transfer on Undergraduate Animal Science Students’ Knowledge
Background: Experiential learning is commonly used in postsecondary settings, especially in undergraduate, agricultural, and laboratory courses. However, a lack of attention has been paid by educators to critical components of experiential learning. Purpose: The effects of reflection mode (peer-verbal or written journal reflection) and transfer level (same, near, or far transfer) on students’ content knowledge were examined in a postsecondary, animal science, laboratory course. Methodology/Approach: A quasi-experimental, two-way, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized. This 2 × 3 factorial design was utilized to test the main and interaction effects of two independent variables (reflection mode and transfer level) on one dependent variable (content knowledge). A pretest score was included as a covariate to control for students’ prior knowledge. Findings/Conclusions: There was a significant interaction effect between the independent variables of reflection mode and transfer level on the dependent variable of content knowledge. Written reflection (when coupled with near transfer), and same transfer (when coupled with peer-verbal reflection), were statistically significant. Implication: Multiple modes of reflection and application can be used during experiential learning in order to achieve effective content knowledge gains. When experiential learning is planned and developed with intentionality, learners receive a valuable, educative experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experiential Education
Journal of Experiential Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experiential Education (JEE) is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing refereed articles on experiential education in diverse contexts. The JEE provides a forum for the empirical and theoretical study of issues concerning experiential learning, program management and policies, educational, developmental, and health outcomes, teaching and facilitation, and research methodology. The JEE is a publication of the Association for Experiential Education. The Journal welcomes submissions from established and emerging scholars writing about experiential education in the context of outdoor adventure programming, service learning, environmental education, classroom instruction, mental and behavioral health, organizational settings, the creative arts, international travel, community programs, or others.
期刊最新文献
Do You See What I See? Examining College Internships From Both the Intern and Supervisor Perspectives Positive Youth Development at Sea: A Case Study of the Shenandoah Model “Wind Therapy” Motorcycling by U.S. Veterans During COVID-19: An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Letter from the Editor A Prospective Evaluation of the Effects of Outdoor Adventure Training Programs on Work-Related Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1