Nanang Sri Darmadi
{"title":"KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA","authors":"Nanang Sri Darmadi","doi":"10.26532/JH.V28I2.9783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fundamental changes in the 1945 is the amendment of Article 1 paragraph (2) as follows: \"Sovereignty belongs to the people and carried out according to the Constitution\". Change the 1945 Constitution has given rise to the Constitutional Court. By the Constitutional Court, the constitution guaranteed as the supreme law that can be enforced as it should. The Constitutional Court in its development, it is feared will be the agency that has authority super body.Particularly in resolving the matter related to its authority, the Constitutional Court can unilaterally interpret the Constitution without being questioned, other than that produced the Constitutional Court ruling is final and binding, so that when there is one party who feels aggrieved by the decision of the Constitutional Court cannot make the effort for other law.From the approach used in this study is normative juridical, because the study was conducted by examining library materials or secondary data relating to the status and authority of the Constitutional Court in constitutional legal system of Indonesia. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis, which is expected to give a detailed overview, systematic, and comprehensive on all matters relating to the object to be examined. The data used in this study is secondary data, it means the data obtained from library materials collected through the study of literature and documentary studies, which are then analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion of this study is that the formation of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia is inseparable from the development of judicial review occurring in several countries in the world, especially during the implementation of judicial review which was pioneered by John Marshall in Marbury versus Madison case.Thinking about the importance of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia has emerged during the discussion of the draft Constitution in BPUPKI, then the idea of judicial review of the need to re-emerge during the discussion draft Judicial Power Act (Act No. 14 of 1970). At the time of the discussion of the 1945 changes in the era reformation, the opinion of the importance of the Constitutional Court appeared. Ultimately, the Third Amendment to the 1945 to be of the Constitutional Court, which serves as the guardian of the Constitution and constitutional interpretation.","PeriodicalId":53034,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/JH.V28I2.9783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

1945年宪法的根本变化是修改第1条第(2)款如下:“主权属于人民并依宪法行使”。修改1945年宪法导致了宪法法院的成立。宪法裁判所认为,宪法是可以执行的最高法律。宪法法院在其发展过程中,恐怕会成为拥有权力的机关。特别是在解决与宪法裁判所的权限有关的问题时,除了宪法裁判所的判决具有终局性和约束力之外,宪法裁判所可以不受质疑地单方面解释宪法,因此,如果一方对宪法裁判所的判决感到不满,就无法为其他法律做出努力。从本研究中使用的方法来看,这是规范性的司法方法,因为本研究是通过审查与印度尼西亚宪法法律制度中宪法法院的地位和权威有关的图书馆资料或二手数据进行的。这项研究的规格是描述性分析,这是期望给出一个详细的概述,系统的,全面的所有事项有关的对象进行检查。本研究使用的数据是二手数据,即通过文献研究和文献研究收集的图书馆资料获得的数据,然后对其进行定性分析。本研究的结论是,印度尼西亚宪法法院的形成与世界上几个国家司法审查的发展密不可分,特别是在John Marshall在Marbury诉Madison案中开创的司法审查的实施过程中。在BPUPKI讨论宪法草案期间出现了对印度尼西亚宪法法院重要性的思考,然后在讨论司法权法案草案(1970年第14号法案)期间再次出现了司法审查的必要性的想法。在讨论1945年时代改革的变化时,出现了宪法法院重要性的意见。最终,宪法第三修正案于1945年由宪法法院提出,它充当宪法的守护者和宪法解释者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA
Fundamental changes in the 1945 is the amendment of Article 1 paragraph (2) as follows: "Sovereignty belongs to the people and carried out according to the Constitution". Change the 1945 Constitution has given rise to the Constitutional Court. By the Constitutional Court, the constitution guaranteed as the supreme law that can be enforced as it should. The Constitutional Court in its development, it is feared will be the agency that has authority super body.Particularly in resolving the matter related to its authority, the Constitutional Court can unilaterally interpret the Constitution without being questioned, other than that produced the Constitutional Court ruling is final and binding, so that when there is one party who feels aggrieved by the decision of the Constitutional Court cannot make the effort for other law.From the approach used in this study is normative juridical, because the study was conducted by examining library materials or secondary data relating to the status and authority of the Constitutional Court in constitutional legal system of Indonesia. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis, which is expected to give a detailed overview, systematic, and comprehensive on all matters relating to the object to be examined. The data used in this study is secondary data, it means the data obtained from library materials collected through the study of literature and documentary studies, which are then analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion of this study is that the formation of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia is inseparable from the development of judicial review occurring in several countries in the world, especially during the implementation of judicial review which was pioneered by John Marshall in Marbury versus Madison case.Thinking about the importance of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia has emerged during the discussion of the draft Constitution in BPUPKI, then the idea of judicial review of the need to re-emerge during the discussion draft Judicial Power Act (Act No. 14 of 1970). At the time of the discussion of the 1945 changes in the era reformation, the opinion of the importance of the Constitutional Court appeared. Ultimately, the Third Amendment to the 1945 to be of the Constitutional Court, which serves as the guardian of the Constitution and constitutional interpretation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
TINJAUAN FIQH SIASAH DAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WACANA SISTEM PROPORSIONAL TERTUTUP PADA PEMILU 2024 Implementasi Penerbitan Izin Penyelenggaraan Angkutan Sewa Khusus Oleh Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Implementation Of Regional Regulation No. 3 Of 2022 Regarding Child Friendly District In Langkat District Viewed From The Perspective Of Fiqh Siyasah Pendaftaran Tanah Untuk Pertama Kali Secara Elektronik Dalam Hukum Pertanahan Nasional Legal Dynamics Of Land Digitalization In The Electronic Land Registration System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1