运用数字技术实现抽象功能思维的具体化方法:系统文献综述

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1564/tme_v30.2.2
Hang Wei, R. Bos, P. Drijvers
{"title":"运用数字技术实现抽象功能思维的具体化方法:系统文献综述","authors":"Hang Wei, R. Bos, P. Drijvers","doi":"10.1564/tme_v30.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Embodied cognition has recently gained increasing attention in mathematics education research. However, little is known about ways to use an embodied approach to reach for mathematical abstraction. In this study, we investigate this topic for the case of functional thinking (FT) using\n digital technology (DT) through a systematic literature study. We searched four databases, resulting in a corpus of 51 papers. As a result, we found that action-based and perception-based embodied approaches to contextual/situational abstraction are more prevalent in literature than pseudo-embodied\n approaches. In addition, the covariation and correspondence views on function are more frequently addressed compared to input-output and mathematical object views. We conclude with a discussion on the interplay of embodied approaches and abstraction in FT. For future research, we suggest investigating\n embodied approaches using digital technology for developing FT concerning different types of mathematical abstraction.","PeriodicalId":43018,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Embodied Approach to Abstract Functional Thinking Using Digital Technology: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Hang Wei, R. Bos, P. Drijvers\",\"doi\":\"10.1564/tme_v30.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Embodied cognition has recently gained increasing attention in mathematics education research. However, little is known about ways to use an embodied approach to reach for mathematical abstraction. In this study, we investigate this topic for the case of functional thinking (FT) using\\n digital technology (DT) through a systematic literature study. We searched four databases, resulting in a corpus of 51 papers. As a result, we found that action-based and perception-based embodied approaches to contextual/situational abstraction are more prevalent in literature than pseudo-embodied\\n approaches. In addition, the covariation and correspondence views on function are more frequently addressed compared to input-output and mathematical object views. We conclude with a discussion on the interplay of embodied approaches and abstraction in FT. For future research, we suggest investigating\\n embodied approaches using digital technology for developing FT concerning different types of mathematical abstraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v30.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v30.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

具身认知近年来在数学教育研究中受到越来越多的关注。然而,人们对如何使用具体化的方法来达到数学抽象知之甚少。在本研究中,我们通过系统的文献研究,以数字技术(DT)的功能思维(FT)为例,探讨了这一主题。我们检索了四个数据库,得到了51篇论文的语料库。因此,我们发现基于行动和基于感知的语境/情境抽象的具体化方法比伪具体化方法在文献中更为普遍。此外,与输入-输出和数学对象视图相比,函数的协变和对应视图更常被处理。最后,我们讨论了嵌入方法和抽象在傅里叶变换中的相互作用。对于未来的研究,我们建议研究使用数字技术开发涉及不同类型数学抽象的傅里叶变换的嵌入方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Embodied Approach to Abstract Functional Thinking Using Digital Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
Embodied cognition has recently gained increasing attention in mathematics education research. However, little is known about ways to use an embodied approach to reach for mathematical abstraction. In this study, we investigate this topic for the case of functional thinking (FT) using digital technology (DT) through a systematic literature study. We searched four databases, resulting in a corpus of 51 papers. As a result, we found that action-based and perception-based embodied approaches to contextual/situational abstraction are more prevalent in literature than pseudo-embodied approaches. In addition, the covariation and correspondence views on function are more frequently addressed compared to input-output and mathematical object views. We conclude with a discussion on the interplay of embodied approaches and abstraction in FT. For future research, we suggest investigating embodied approaches using digital technology for developing FT concerning different types of mathematical abstraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Game Design Process for the Concept of Area A Quarter-Circle Investigation, Explanation and Generalization An Embodied Approach to Abstract Functional Thinking Using Digital Technology: A Systematic Literature Review How Blended Learning Techniques can be Applied in Teaching Mathematics to Engineering Students A Quantitative Assessment of High School Math Teacher's Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1