埃及东部沙漠稠油井人工举升系统性能分析

Mahmoud Atef El Gharbawi, A. Elgibaly, A. Salem, Mohamed Abbas
{"title":"埃及东部沙漠稠油井人工举升系统性能分析","authors":"Mahmoud Atef El Gharbawi, A. Elgibaly, A. Salem, Mohamed Abbas","doi":"10.2118/196173-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper describes the implementation of a performance analysis (PA) review and a comprehensive root cause failure analysis (RCFA) for the artificial lift system (ALS) failures in heavy oil wells. The subject wells, located in Egyptian Eastern Desert (EED), have been operated by Canadian-Egyptian joint venture. Progressive cavity pump (PCP) and beam pump (BP) have been selected as the preferred ALS methods. With the objective of improving ALS performance, RCFA identifies the main causes of ALS failures and proposes guidelines and recommendations with a new open source service for the current and future development for EED Oil companies.\n PA has been applied using some Key Performance Indicators (KPI), such as: failure index, recurrence index, and average run life in order to track all failed and crucial issues. RCFA has been applied to different ALS, such as: BP and PCP. Therefore, the definition or limitation of the boundaries of each system and the classification of failures were performed. RCFA covered failures between 2012 and 2018 for average 150 active wells and 622 failures. Finally, the new open source service applied as a trial to evolve the failure tracking and decision making methodology.\n PA review showed a high failure and recurrence index that reached 3.0 and 3.7, respectively, in 2014 then declined to 1.0 and 1.7, respectively, in 2017 as a result of comprehensive corrective actions implemented. RCFA showed that rod string failure in BP was and still is a dominant failure with 200 failures over the last six years. Moreover, Down-hole pump failure in PCP was the major PCP failure system although its failures declined from 80 failures in 2014 to 14 failures in 2018. Several field cases were presented to cover the dominant cause of failures for both BP and PCP wells. Most wells had a significant improvement in their mean time to failure (MTTF) after reviewing design, installation and operation procedures.\n The procedure for carrying out this methodology and implementing lessons learned has been presented in this paper. In addition, the new open source integration service provides an increased visibility about individual well performance issues and more broadly, about field performance and ALS failures.","PeriodicalId":10909,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of the Artificial Lift Systems for Heavy Oil Wells in the Egyptian Eastern Desert\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Atef El Gharbawi, A. Elgibaly, A. Salem, Mohamed Abbas\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196173-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper describes the implementation of a performance analysis (PA) review and a comprehensive root cause failure analysis (RCFA) for the artificial lift system (ALS) failures in heavy oil wells. The subject wells, located in Egyptian Eastern Desert (EED), have been operated by Canadian-Egyptian joint venture. Progressive cavity pump (PCP) and beam pump (BP) have been selected as the preferred ALS methods. With the objective of improving ALS performance, RCFA identifies the main causes of ALS failures and proposes guidelines and recommendations with a new open source service for the current and future development for EED Oil companies.\\n PA has been applied using some Key Performance Indicators (KPI), such as: failure index, recurrence index, and average run life in order to track all failed and crucial issues. RCFA has been applied to different ALS, such as: BP and PCP. Therefore, the definition or limitation of the boundaries of each system and the classification of failures were performed. RCFA covered failures between 2012 and 2018 for average 150 active wells and 622 failures. Finally, the new open source service applied as a trial to evolve the failure tracking and decision making methodology.\\n PA review showed a high failure and recurrence index that reached 3.0 and 3.7, respectively, in 2014 then declined to 1.0 and 1.7, respectively, in 2017 as a result of comprehensive corrective actions implemented. RCFA showed that rod string failure in BP was and still is a dominant failure with 200 failures over the last six years. Moreover, Down-hole pump failure in PCP was the major PCP failure system although its failures declined from 80 failures in 2014 to 14 failures in 2018. Several field cases were presented to cover the dominant cause of failures for both BP and PCP wells. Most wells had a significant improvement in their mean time to failure (MTTF) after reviewing design, installation and operation procedures.\\n The procedure for carrying out this methodology and implementing lessons learned has been presented in this paper. In addition, the new open source integration service provides an increased visibility about individual well performance issues and more broadly, about field performance and ALS failures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196173-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 01, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196173-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了针对稠油井人工举升系统(ALS)故障的性能分析(PA)审查和全面的根本原因分析(RCFA)的实施。该井位于埃及东部沙漠(EED),由加拿大-埃及合资企业运营。渐进腔泵(PCP)和束泵(BP)是首选的ALS治疗方法。为了提高ALS的性能,RCFA确定了ALS失效的主要原因,并为EED Oil公司当前和未来的发展提出了新的开源服务指南和建议。PA已应用于一些关键性能指标(KPI),如:故障指数、复发指数和平均运行寿命,以跟踪所有失败和关键问题。RCFA已应用于不同的ALS,如:BP和PCP。因此,对每个系统的边界进行了定义或限制,并对故障进行了分类。RCFA涵盖了2012年至2018年期间平均150口活动井和622口失效井。最后,将新的开源服务作为试验应用,以改进故障跟踪和决策方法。PA复查显示,2014年不合格率和复发率指数较高,分别达到3.0和3.7,2017年由于实施了综合整改措施,不合格率和复发率分别下降到1.0和1.7。RCFA表明,在过去的六年中,BP的抽油杆柱失效仍然是主要的失效,发生了200起失效。此外,PCP的井下泵故障是主要的PCP故障系统,尽管其故障从2014年的80起下降到2018年的14起。介绍了几个现场案例,以涵盖BP和PCP井失败的主要原因。在审查了设计、安装和操作程序后,大多数井的平均无故障时间(MTTF)都有了显著改善。本文介绍了执行这一方法和实施所吸取的经验教训的程序。此外,新的开源集成服务可以提高对单井性能问题的可视性,更广泛地说,可以了解现场性能和ALS故障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Analysis of the Artificial Lift Systems for Heavy Oil Wells in the Egyptian Eastern Desert
This paper describes the implementation of a performance analysis (PA) review and a comprehensive root cause failure analysis (RCFA) for the artificial lift system (ALS) failures in heavy oil wells. The subject wells, located in Egyptian Eastern Desert (EED), have been operated by Canadian-Egyptian joint venture. Progressive cavity pump (PCP) and beam pump (BP) have been selected as the preferred ALS methods. With the objective of improving ALS performance, RCFA identifies the main causes of ALS failures and proposes guidelines and recommendations with a new open source service for the current and future development for EED Oil companies. PA has been applied using some Key Performance Indicators (KPI), such as: failure index, recurrence index, and average run life in order to track all failed and crucial issues. RCFA has been applied to different ALS, such as: BP and PCP. Therefore, the definition or limitation of the boundaries of each system and the classification of failures were performed. RCFA covered failures between 2012 and 2018 for average 150 active wells and 622 failures. Finally, the new open source service applied as a trial to evolve the failure tracking and decision making methodology. PA review showed a high failure and recurrence index that reached 3.0 and 3.7, respectively, in 2014 then declined to 1.0 and 1.7, respectively, in 2017 as a result of comprehensive corrective actions implemented. RCFA showed that rod string failure in BP was and still is a dominant failure with 200 failures over the last six years. Moreover, Down-hole pump failure in PCP was the major PCP failure system although its failures declined from 80 failures in 2014 to 14 failures in 2018. Several field cases were presented to cover the dominant cause of failures for both BP and PCP wells. Most wells had a significant improvement in their mean time to failure (MTTF) after reviewing design, installation and operation procedures. The procedure for carrying out this methodology and implementing lessons learned has been presented in this paper. In addition, the new open source integration service provides an increased visibility about individual well performance issues and more broadly, about field performance and ALS failures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verification of Autonomous Inflow Control Valve Flow Performance Within Heavy Oil-SAGD Thermal Flow Loop Reactive vs Proactive Intelligent Well Injection Evaluation for EOR in a Stratified GOM Deepwater Wilcox Reservoir using Integrated Simulation-Surface Network Modeling A Novel Workflow for Oil Production Forecasting using Ensemble-Based Decline Curve Analysis An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoir Rocks Characterization of Organic Pores within High-Maturation Shale Gas Reservoirs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1