教育系统改善之路漫漫:联邦制国家多层次比较个案研究

IF 3.1 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Comparative Education Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860
A. Rivas
{"title":"教育系统改善之路漫漫:联邦制国家多层次比较个案研究","authors":"A. Rivas","doi":"10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ideas about educational improvement are contextual and contested. This study proposes a critical and pragmatic framework to analyse systemic improvement, taking into account the paradoxes and limitations of quantitative sources. The study compared 83 subnational educational systems of three federal countries in Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Based on a mixed methodology, we analysed the evolution of multiple educational indicators in 2004-2019. Then, we applied an expert’s consultation process to select four cases of systemic improvement for further analysis: Ceará and Pernambuco in Brazil, Córdoba in Argentina, and Puebla in Mexico. Each case was studied in its context, with a multi-level analysis that links it to national educational policies. Instead of a series of policy recipes, we find that constructing a solid platform for education governance is the critical element shared by the studied cases where there is subnational systemic improvement over a long period.","PeriodicalId":47655,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The long road to systemic improvement in education: a comparative multi-level case study in federal countries\",\"authors\":\"A. Rivas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ideas about educational improvement are contextual and contested. This study proposes a critical and pragmatic framework to analyse systemic improvement, taking into account the paradoxes and limitations of quantitative sources. The study compared 83 subnational educational systems of three federal countries in Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Based on a mixed methodology, we analysed the evolution of multiple educational indicators in 2004-2019. Then, we applied an expert’s consultation process to select four cases of systemic improvement for further analysis: Ceará and Pernambuco in Brazil, Córdoba in Argentina, and Puebla in Mexico. Each case was studied in its context, with a multi-level analysis that links it to national educational policies. Instead of a series of policy recipes, we find that constructing a solid platform for education governance is the critical element shared by the studied cases where there is subnational systemic improvement over a long period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2022.2133860","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

关于教育改进的想法是有背景的,也是有争议的。本研究提出了一个关键和实用的框架来分析系统改进,考虑到定量来源的悖论和局限性。该研究比较了拉丁美洲三个联邦国家(阿根廷、巴西和墨西哥)的83个地方教育系统。基于混合方法,我们分析了2004-2019年多个教育指标的演变。然后,我们采用专家咨询程序选择了四个系统性改进的案例进行进一步分析:巴西的塞埃尔和伯南布哥,阿根廷的Córdoba和墨西哥的普埃布拉。每个案例都在其背景下进行了研究,并进行了多层次的分析,将其与国家教育政策联系起来。我们发现,构建一个坚实的教育治理平台,不是一系列的政策处方,而是研究案例的关键要素,这些案例在长期的地方系统性改进中都有共同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The long road to systemic improvement in education: a comparative multi-level case study in federal countries
ABSTRACT Ideas about educational improvement are contextual and contested. This study proposes a critical and pragmatic framework to analyse systemic improvement, taking into account the paradoxes and limitations of quantitative sources. The study compared 83 subnational educational systems of three federal countries in Latin America: Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. Based on a mixed methodology, we analysed the evolution of multiple educational indicators in 2004-2019. Then, we applied an expert’s consultation process to select four cases of systemic improvement for further analysis: Ceará and Pernambuco in Brazil, Córdoba in Argentina, and Puebla in Mexico. Each case was studied in its context, with a multi-level analysis that links it to national educational policies. Instead of a series of policy recipes, we find that constructing a solid platform for education governance is the critical element shared by the studied cases where there is subnational systemic improvement over a long period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Education
Comparative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
21.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: This international journal of educational studies presents up-to-date information with analyses of significant problems and trends throughout the world. Comparative Education engages with challenging theoretical and methodological issues - and also considers the implications of comparative studies for the formation and implementation of policies - not only in education but in social, national and international development. Thus it welcomes contributions from associated disciplines in the fields of government, management, sociology - and indeed technology and communications - as these affect educational research and policy decisions.
期刊最新文献
A world agenda? How was universal primary education selected as a UN Millennium Development Goal? The same and the change: a topology of a Sino–French joint programme Education and choice in the United Kingdom: measuring school choice policies in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland (1980–2020) BRICS, sub-imperialism and education in Mozambique Special Issue of Comparative Education: Global governance and the promissory visions of education: challenges and agendas*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1