{"title":"教师引导探究","authors":"A. Harris, Michelle Jones","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2117522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the ebbing of COVID-19, the current educational context remains one of rapid and unrelenting change. The pressure on those leading schools is unlikely to recede any time soon and many headteachers are already voting with their feet. The recruitment and retention crisis remains acute in many education systems around the world. Leadership stability is now a real challenge in some schools. The question of how to sustain school performance, given the crisis in recruitment and retention within the profession is now front and centre. The substantial evidential base on school effectiveness and improvement underlines that sustaining performance depends, to a considerable degree, on the school’s internal capacity to maintain and support the daily work (Creemers, Peters, and Reynolds 2022). Recent research also highlights the centrality of distributed leadership practices that engage, and draw upon, the leadership capabilities of teachers (Printy and Liu 2021). The clear message, from the international evidence base is that sustaining school performance and improving it requires the leadership of the many rather than the few and that improvements in learning are more likely to be achieved when leadership is instructionally focused and located closest to the classroom (Liu, Bellibaş, and Gümüş 2021). The core implication, from this evidence, is that the leadership should be extended to teachers, not in a formal role-based way but through the creation of lateral opportunities for collaborative engagement, professional enquiry and active experimentation that are directly linked to improving learning and teaching. When authentic teacher leadership occurs within a school, the evidence from many countries shows that it not only has a positive impact on school culture but also has the potential to create the capacity for meaningful organisational change and improvement (Harris, Jones, and Huffman 2018).","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"25 1","pages":"309 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers leading enquiry\",\"authors\":\"A. Harris, Michelle Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2022.2117522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the ebbing of COVID-19, the current educational context remains one of rapid and unrelenting change. The pressure on those leading schools is unlikely to recede any time soon and many headteachers are already voting with their feet. The recruitment and retention crisis remains acute in many education systems around the world. Leadership stability is now a real challenge in some schools. The question of how to sustain school performance, given the crisis in recruitment and retention within the profession is now front and centre. The substantial evidential base on school effectiveness and improvement underlines that sustaining performance depends, to a considerable degree, on the school’s internal capacity to maintain and support the daily work (Creemers, Peters, and Reynolds 2022). Recent research also highlights the centrality of distributed leadership practices that engage, and draw upon, the leadership capabilities of teachers (Printy and Liu 2021). The clear message, from the international evidence base is that sustaining school performance and improving it requires the leadership of the many rather than the few and that improvements in learning are more likely to be achieved when leadership is instructionally focused and located closest to the classroom (Liu, Bellibaş, and Gümüş 2021). The core implication, from this evidence, is that the leadership should be extended to teachers, not in a formal role-based way but through the creation of lateral opportunities for collaborative engagement, professional enquiry and active experimentation that are directly linked to improving learning and teaching. When authentic teacher leadership occurs within a school, the evidence from many countries shows that it not only has a positive impact on school culture but also has the potential to create the capacity for meaningful organisational change and improvement (Harris, Jones, and Huffman 2018).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2117522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2117522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
尽管COVID-19疫情有所消退,但当前的教育环境仍然是快速而无情的变化。这些顶尖学校面临的压力不太可能在短期内减轻,许多校长已经在用脚投票了。在世界各地的许多教育系统中,招聘和留住危机仍然很严重。在一些学校,领导层的稳定性现在是一个真正的挑战。考虑到教师行业在招聘和留用方面的危机,如何维持学校表现的问题现在是最重要的。关于学校有效性和改进的大量证据强调,持续的绩效在很大程度上取决于学校维持和支持日常工作的内部能力(Creemers, Peters, and Reynolds 2022)。最近的研究还强调了分布式领导实践的中心地位,这些实践参与并利用了教师的领导能力(Printy和Liu 2021)。来自国际证据基础的明确信息是,维持和改善学校绩效需要许多人的领导,而不是少数人的领导,当领导以教学为重点并位于离教室最近的地方时,学习的改善更有可能实现(Liu, belllibaku, and g m 2021)。从这一证据来看,其核心含义是,领导力应该扩展到教师身上,而不是以正式的基于角色的方式,而是通过创造合作参与、专业探究和积极实验的横向机会,这些机会与改善学习和教学直接相关。当真正的教师领导出现在学校时,来自许多国家的证据表明,它不仅对学校文化产生积极影响,而且有可能创造有意义的组织变革和改进的能力(Harris, Jones, and Huffman 2018)。
Despite the ebbing of COVID-19, the current educational context remains one of rapid and unrelenting change. The pressure on those leading schools is unlikely to recede any time soon and many headteachers are already voting with their feet. The recruitment and retention crisis remains acute in many education systems around the world. Leadership stability is now a real challenge in some schools. The question of how to sustain school performance, given the crisis in recruitment and retention within the profession is now front and centre. The substantial evidential base on school effectiveness and improvement underlines that sustaining performance depends, to a considerable degree, on the school’s internal capacity to maintain and support the daily work (Creemers, Peters, and Reynolds 2022). Recent research also highlights the centrality of distributed leadership practices that engage, and draw upon, the leadership capabilities of teachers (Printy and Liu 2021). The clear message, from the international evidence base is that sustaining school performance and improving it requires the leadership of the many rather than the few and that improvements in learning are more likely to be achieved when leadership is instructionally focused and located closest to the classroom (Liu, Bellibaş, and Gümüş 2021). The core implication, from this evidence, is that the leadership should be extended to teachers, not in a formal role-based way but through the creation of lateral opportunities for collaborative engagement, professional enquiry and active experimentation that are directly linked to improving learning and teaching. When authentic teacher leadership occurs within a school, the evidence from many countries shows that it not only has a positive impact on school culture but also has the potential to create the capacity for meaningful organisational change and improvement (Harris, Jones, and Huffman 2018).
期刊介绍:
School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.