烟气中溴化物测定方法的改进

Hyun-Soo Park, Yong-Won Han, Gil-young Oh, Eun-Ha Oh, Min-Young Kim, Hak-Rim Kim, H. Lim, Yong-Moon Jung, Yoon-Gyeong Cha, Duk-An Lee, Gwi-Nim Park, Ui-Joo Lee
{"title":"烟气中溴化物测定方法的改进","authors":"Hyun-Soo Park, Yong-Won Han, Gil-young Oh, Eun-Ha Oh, Min-Young Kim, Hak-Rim Kim, H. Lim, Yong-Moon Jung, Yoon-Gyeong Cha, Duk-An Lee, Gwi-Nim Park, Ui-Joo Lee","doi":"10.36278/jeaht.26.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method detection limit (MDL) using UV-VIS spectrometry (UV/VIS) is the primary method to detect bromine compounds in the flue gas. However, the level of bromine compounds in the flue gas is 0.6 ppm, reaching 20% of the emission limit of 3.0 ppm, which limits the analysis of low-concentration samples. As per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and official test standards for water pollution, bromine compound analysis was performed using ion chromatography (IC). Hydrogen chloride was analyzed using IC, referencing official test standards for air pollution. Therefore, 0.1 M NaOH and distilled water (D.W.) were applied to the absorption solution of the IC analysis sample. Validation was conducted for IC (D.W.), IC (0.1 M NaOH), and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) to improve the analysis method for bromine compounds in the flue gas. The linearity (R2) of the calibration curve for IC (D.W.) satisfied the R2 (0.98 or more) value calculated in the UV/VIS of the official test standards for air pollution. However, the R2 of UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH) was not satisfied. In IC (D.W.) analysis results, the average values of MDL, MLQ (minimum level of quantification), accuracy and precision were 0.127 ppm, 0.403 ppm, 3.7%, and 102.9%, respectively. MDL and MLQ showed the lowest concentration compared to the other two methods, and had high accuracy and precision. Regarding the recovery rate by the absorbing liquid, IC (D.W.) was the highest at 93.55%, followed by UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH). This study analyzed bromine compounds in flue gas with higher accuracy and precision using the IC (D.W.) method compared to IC (0.1 M NaOH) and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH).","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Method for Measuring Bromine Compounds in Flue Gas\",\"authors\":\"Hyun-Soo Park, Yong-Won Han, Gil-young Oh, Eun-Ha Oh, Min-Young Kim, Hak-Rim Kim, H. Lim, Yong-Moon Jung, Yoon-Gyeong Cha, Duk-An Lee, Gwi-Nim Park, Ui-Joo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.36278/jeaht.26.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The method detection limit (MDL) using UV-VIS spectrometry (UV/VIS) is the primary method to detect bromine compounds in the flue gas. However, the level of bromine compounds in the flue gas is 0.6 ppm, reaching 20% of the emission limit of 3.0 ppm, which limits the analysis of low-concentration samples. As per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and official test standards for water pollution, bromine compound analysis was performed using ion chromatography (IC). Hydrogen chloride was analyzed using IC, referencing official test standards for air pollution. Therefore, 0.1 M NaOH and distilled water (D.W.) were applied to the absorption solution of the IC analysis sample. Validation was conducted for IC (D.W.), IC (0.1 M NaOH), and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) to improve the analysis method for bromine compounds in the flue gas. The linearity (R2) of the calibration curve for IC (D.W.) satisfied the R2 (0.98 or more) value calculated in the UV/VIS of the official test standards for air pollution. However, the R2 of UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH) was not satisfied. In IC (D.W.) analysis results, the average values of MDL, MLQ (minimum level of quantification), accuracy and precision were 0.127 ppm, 0.403 ppm, 3.7%, and 102.9%, respectively. MDL and MLQ showed the lowest concentration compared to the other two methods, and had high accuracy and precision. Regarding the recovery rate by the absorbing liquid, IC (D.W.) was the highest at 93.55%, followed by UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH). This study analyzed bromine compounds in flue gas with higher accuracy and precision using the IC (D.W.) method compared to IC (0.1 M NaOH) and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH).\",\"PeriodicalId\":15758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.26.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.26.1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

紫外-可见光谱法(UV/VIS)的检测限(MDL)是检测烟气中溴化合物的主要方法。然而,烟气中溴化合物的含量为0.6 ppm,达到排放限值3.0 ppm的20%,这限制了对低浓度样品的分析。根据美国环境保护署和官方水污染测试标准,溴化合物分析采用离子色谱法(IC)进行。参照官方空气污染检测标准,采用集成电路对氯化氢进行了分析。因此,在IC分析样品的吸收溶液中加入0.1 M NaOH和蒸馏水(D.W.)。对IC (D.W.)、IC (0.1 M NaOH)和UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH)进行了验证,以改进烟气中溴化合物的分析方法。IC (D.W.)校准曲线的线性(R2)满足官方空气污染检测标准中UV/VIS计算的R2(0.98或更高)值。然而,UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH)和IC (0.1 M NaOH)的R2不令人满意。在IC (D.W.)分析结果中,MDL、MLQ(最低定量水平)、准确度和精密度的平均值分别为0.127 ppm、0.403 ppm、3.7%和102.9%。与其他两种方法相比,MDL和MLQ的浓度最低,准确度和精密度较高。吸收液的回收率以IC (D.W.)最高,为93.55%,其次为UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH)和IC (0.1 M NaOH)。与IC法(0.1 M NaOH)和UV/VIS法(0.1 M NaOH)相比,本研究使用IC (D.W.)法分析烟气中的溴化合物具有更高的准确度和精密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving the Method for Measuring Bromine Compounds in Flue Gas
The method detection limit (MDL) using UV-VIS spectrometry (UV/VIS) is the primary method to detect bromine compounds in the flue gas. However, the level of bromine compounds in the flue gas is 0.6 ppm, reaching 20% of the emission limit of 3.0 ppm, which limits the analysis of low-concentration samples. As per the United States Environmental Protection Agency and official test standards for water pollution, bromine compound analysis was performed using ion chromatography (IC). Hydrogen chloride was analyzed using IC, referencing official test standards for air pollution. Therefore, 0.1 M NaOH and distilled water (D.W.) were applied to the absorption solution of the IC analysis sample. Validation was conducted for IC (D.W.), IC (0.1 M NaOH), and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) to improve the analysis method for bromine compounds in the flue gas. The linearity (R2) of the calibration curve for IC (D.W.) satisfied the R2 (0.98 or more) value calculated in the UV/VIS of the official test standards for air pollution. However, the R2 of UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH) was not satisfied. In IC (D.W.) analysis results, the average values of MDL, MLQ (minimum level of quantification), accuracy and precision were 0.127 ppm, 0.403 ppm, 3.7%, and 102.9%, respectively. MDL and MLQ showed the lowest concentration compared to the other two methods, and had high accuracy and precision. Regarding the recovery rate by the absorbing liquid, IC (D.W.) was the highest at 93.55%, followed by UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH) and IC (0.1 M NaOH). This study analyzed bromine compounds in flue gas with higher accuracy and precision using the IC (D.W.) method compared to IC (0.1 M NaOH) and UV/VIS (0.1 M NaOH).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds Distribution in Downtown Ansan Near Industrial Complexes Global Performance, Trends, and Challenges for Assessment and Management of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Critical Review Examination of the Utility of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Fish Species in Han Rivr, Korea Distribution and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the South Han River Analysis and Change in Concentration of Micropollutants in Stream Affected by WWTP Effluents using Portable Composite Sampler and LC-HRMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1