32Gb/s有线接收机,具有低频均衡器、CTLE和28nm CMOS双抽头DFE

S. Parikh, T. Kao, Y. Hidaka, J. Jiang, Asako Toda, S. McLeod, W. Walker, Y. Koyanagi, Toshiyuki Shibuya, J. Yamada
{"title":"32Gb/s有线接收机,具有低频均衡器、CTLE和28nm CMOS双抽头DFE","authors":"S. Parikh, T. Kao, Y. Hidaka, J. Jiang, Asako Toda, S. McLeod, W. Walker, Y. Koyanagi, Toshiyuki Shibuya, J. Yamada","doi":"10.1109/ISSCC.2013.6487622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standards such as OIF CEI-25G, CEI-28G and 32G-FC require transceivers operating at high data rates over imperfect channels. Equalizers are used to cancel the inter-symbol interference (ISI) caused by frequency-dependent channel losses such as skin effect and dielectric loss. The primary objective of an equalizer is to compensate for high-frequency loss, which often exceeds 30dB at fs/2. However, due to the skin effect in a PCB stripline, which starts at 10MHz or lower, we also need to compensate for a small amount of loss at low frequency (e.g., 500MHz). Figure 2.1.1 shows simulated responses of a backplane channel (42.6dB loss at fs/2 for 32Gb/s) with conventional high-frequency equalizers only (4-tap feed-forward equalizer (FFE), 1st-order continuous-time linear equalizer (CTLE) with a dominant pole at fs/4, and 1-tap DFE) and with additional low-frequency equalization. Conventional equalizers cannot compensate for the small amount of low-frequency loss because the slope of the low-frequency loss is too gentle (<;3dB/dec). The FFE and CTLE do not have a pole in the low frequency region and hence have only a steep slope of 20dB/dec above their zero. The DFE cancels only short-term ISI. Effects of such low-frequency loss have often been overlooked or neglected, because 1) the loss is small (2 to 3dB), 2) when plotted using the linear frequency axis which is commonly used to show frequency dependence of skin effect and dielectric loss, the low-frequency loss is degenerated at DC and hardly visible (Fig. 2.1.1a), and 3) the long ISI tail of the channel pulse response seems well cancelled at first glance by conventional equalizers only (Fig. 2.1.1b). However, the uncompensated low-frequency loss causes non-negligible long-term residual ISI, because the integral of the residual ISI magnitude keeps going up for several hundred UI. As shown by the eye diagrams in the inset of Fig. 2.1.1(b), the residual long-term ISI results in 0.42UI data-dependent Jitter (DDJ) that is difficult to reduce further by enhancing FFE/CTLE/DFE, but can be reduced to 0.21UI by adding a low-frequency equalizer (LFEQ). Savoj et al. also recently reported long-tail cancellation [2].","PeriodicalId":6378,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers","volume":"38 1","pages":"28-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"73","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A 32Gb/s wireline receiver with a low-frequency equalizer, CTLE and 2-tap DFE in 28nm CMOS\",\"authors\":\"S. Parikh, T. Kao, Y. Hidaka, J. Jiang, Asako Toda, S. McLeod, W. Walker, Y. Koyanagi, Toshiyuki Shibuya, J. Yamada\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSCC.2013.6487622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standards such as OIF CEI-25G, CEI-28G and 32G-FC require transceivers operating at high data rates over imperfect channels. Equalizers are used to cancel the inter-symbol interference (ISI) caused by frequency-dependent channel losses such as skin effect and dielectric loss. The primary objective of an equalizer is to compensate for high-frequency loss, which often exceeds 30dB at fs/2. However, due to the skin effect in a PCB stripline, which starts at 10MHz or lower, we also need to compensate for a small amount of loss at low frequency (e.g., 500MHz). Figure 2.1.1 shows simulated responses of a backplane channel (42.6dB loss at fs/2 for 32Gb/s) with conventional high-frequency equalizers only (4-tap feed-forward equalizer (FFE), 1st-order continuous-time linear equalizer (CTLE) with a dominant pole at fs/4, and 1-tap DFE) and with additional low-frequency equalization. Conventional equalizers cannot compensate for the small amount of low-frequency loss because the slope of the low-frequency loss is too gentle (<;3dB/dec). The FFE and CTLE do not have a pole in the low frequency region and hence have only a steep slope of 20dB/dec above their zero. The DFE cancels only short-term ISI. Effects of such low-frequency loss have often been overlooked or neglected, because 1) the loss is small (2 to 3dB), 2) when plotted using the linear frequency axis which is commonly used to show frequency dependence of skin effect and dielectric loss, the low-frequency loss is degenerated at DC and hardly visible (Fig. 2.1.1a), and 3) the long ISI tail of the channel pulse response seems well cancelled at first glance by conventional equalizers only (Fig. 2.1.1b). However, the uncompensated low-frequency loss causes non-negligible long-term residual ISI, because the integral of the residual ISI magnitude keeps going up for several hundred UI. As shown by the eye diagrams in the inset of Fig. 2.1.1(b), the residual long-term ISI results in 0.42UI data-dependent Jitter (DDJ) that is difficult to reduce further by enhancing FFE/CTLE/DFE, but can be reduced to 0.21UI by adding a low-frequency equalizer (LFEQ). Savoj et al. also recently reported long-tail cancellation [2].\",\"PeriodicalId\":6378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"28-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"73\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2013.6487622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSCC.2013.6487622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

摘要

诸如OIF CEI-25G、CEI-28G和32G-FC等标准要求收发器在不完善的信道上以高数据速率运行。均衡器用于消除由频率相关的信道损耗(如集肤效应和介电损耗)引起的码间干扰。均衡器的主要目的是补偿高频损耗,在fs/2时,高频损耗通常超过30dB。然而,由于PCB带状线中的趋肤效应,从10MHz或更低的频率开始,我们还需要补偿低频(例如500MHz)的少量损耗。图2.1.1显示了仅使用传统高频均衡器(4分导前馈均衡器(FFE)、主导极为fs/4的一阶连续线性均衡器(CTLE)和1分导DFE)和附加低频均衡的背板通道(32Gb/s时fs/2损耗42.6dB)的模拟响应。传统的均衡器不能补偿少量的低频损耗,因为低频损耗的斜率太平缓(<;3dB/dec)。FFE和CTLE在低频区域没有极点,因此在它们的零点上方只有20dB/dec的陡峭斜率。DFE只取消短期ISI。这种低频损耗的影响经常被忽视或忽略,因为1)损耗很小(2至3dB), 2)当使用线性频率轴(通常用于显示集皮效应和介质损耗的频率依赖性)绘制时,低频损耗在直流处退化并且几乎不可见(图2.1.1),以及3)通道脉冲响应的长ISI尾乍一看似乎很好地被传统均衡器抵消(图2.1.1)。然而,未补偿的低频损耗会导致不可忽略的长期残余ISI,因为残余ISI幅度的积分持续上升数百UI。如图2.1.1(b)中插入的眼图所示,残留的长期ISI导致0.42UI的数据相关抖动(DDJ),很难通过增强FFE/CTLE/DFE来进一步降低,但可以通过添加低频均衡器(LFEQ)将其降低到0.21UI。Savoj等人最近也报道了长尾消除[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A 32Gb/s wireline receiver with a low-frequency equalizer, CTLE and 2-tap DFE in 28nm CMOS
Standards such as OIF CEI-25G, CEI-28G and 32G-FC require transceivers operating at high data rates over imperfect channels. Equalizers are used to cancel the inter-symbol interference (ISI) caused by frequency-dependent channel losses such as skin effect and dielectric loss. The primary objective of an equalizer is to compensate for high-frequency loss, which often exceeds 30dB at fs/2. However, due to the skin effect in a PCB stripline, which starts at 10MHz or lower, we also need to compensate for a small amount of loss at low frequency (e.g., 500MHz). Figure 2.1.1 shows simulated responses of a backplane channel (42.6dB loss at fs/2 for 32Gb/s) with conventional high-frequency equalizers only (4-tap feed-forward equalizer (FFE), 1st-order continuous-time linear equalizer (CTLE) with a dominant pole at fs/4, and 1-tap DFE) and with additional low-frequency equalization. Conventional equalizers cannot compensate for the small amount of low-frequency loss because the slope of the low-frequency loss is too gentle (<;3dB/dec). The FFE and CTLE do not have a pole in the low frequency region and hence have only a steep slope of 20dB/dec above their zero. The DFE cancels only short-term ISI. Effects of such low-frequency loss have often been overlooked or neglected, because 1) the loss is small (2 to 3dB), 2) when plotted using the linear frequency axis which is commonly used to show frequency dependence of skin effect and dielectric loss, the low-frequency loss is degenerated at DC and hardly visible (Fig. 2.1.1a), and 3) the long ISI tail of the channel pulse response seems well cancelled at first glance by conventional equalizers only (Fig. 2.1.1b). However, the uncompensated low-frequency loss causes non-negligible long-term residual ISI, because the integral of the residual ISI magnitude keeps going up for several hundred UI. As shown by the eye diagrams in the inset of Fig. 2.1.1(b), the residual long-term ISI results in 0.42UI data-dependent Jitter (DDJ) that is difficult to reduce further by enhancing FFE/CTLE/DFE, but can be reduced to 0.21UI by adding a low-frequency equalizer (LFEQ). Savoj et al. also recently reported long-tail cancellation [2].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A CMOS dual-switching power-supply modulator with 8% efficiency improvement for 20MHz LTE Envelope Tracking RF power amplifiers A 3.4pJ FeRAM-enabled D flip-flop in 0.13µm CMOS for nonvolatile processing in digital systems Razor-lite: A side-channel error-detection register for timing-margin recovery in 45nm SOI CMOS Self-super-cutoff power gating with state retention on a 0.3V 0.29fJ/cycle/gate 32b RISC core in 0.13µm CMOS A fully intraocular 0.0169mm2/pixel 512-channel self-calibrating epiretinal prosthesis in 65nm CMOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1