超连接社会中的媒体话语:媒体罢工期间媒体框架与Twitter话语的比较

S. Cho, Donghee Don Shin
{"title":"超连接社会中的媒体话语:媒体罢工期间媒体框架与Twitter话语的比较","authors":"S. Cho, Donghee Don Shin","doi":"10.1108/INFO-02-2013-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study aims to examine the impact of news frames associated with traditional media and with Twitter discourse on social issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using semantic network analysis, it identifies the role of new alternative channels as well as discussing ways of understanding and consuming news content in the changing media environment. Additionally, it focuses on the dominant Twitter communicators who rank high in betweenness centrality. Findings – The results confirmed that traditional news media tend to superficially describe main events and media strikes without comment. They tended to consciously or unconsciously favor media corporations by engendering anxiety and conflict or by restraining reports on the rationales of the strike. Twitter discourse, on the contrary, positively represents the striker's arguments and frequently reveals support of the strike. Research limitations/implications – The data set of this study was specialized, not generalized. However, the findings exte...","PeriodicalId":88488,"journal":{"name":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","volume":"17 1","pages":"67-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media discourse in a hyper connected society: a comparison between media frame and Twitter discourse during media strike\",\"authors\":\"S. Cho, Donghee Don Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/INFO-02-2013-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This study aims to examine the impact of news frames associated with traditional media and with Twitter discourse on social issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using semantic network analysis, it identifies the role of new alternative channels as well as discussing ways of understanding and consuming news content in the changing media environment. Additionally, it focuses on the dominant Twitter communicators who rank high in betweenness centrality. Findings – The results confirmed that traditional news media tend to superficially describe main events and media strikes without comment. They tended to consciously or unconsciously favor media corporations by engendering anxiety and conflict or by restraining reports on the rationales of the strike. Twitter discourse, on the contrary, positively represents the striker's arguments and frequently reveals support of the strike. Research limitations/implications – The data set of this study was specialized, not generalized. However, the findings exte...\",\"PeriodicalId\":88488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"67-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-02-2013-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-02-2013-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的-本研究旨在研究与传统媒体和Twitter话语相关的新闻框架对社会问题的影响。设计/方法论/方法-使用语义网络分析,它确定了新的替代渠道的作用,并讨论了在不断变化的媒体环境中理解和消费新闻内容的方法。此外,它关注的是Twitter上占主导地位的沟通者,他们在中间性中心性方面排名很高。调查结果-结果证实,传统新闻媒体倾向于肤浅地描述主要事件和媒体罢工而不作评论。他们有意无意地通过制造不安和矛盾,或限制对罢工理由的报道,向媒体公司倾斜。相反,Twitter话语积极地代表了罢工者的观点,并经常显示出对罢工的支持。研究局限性/启示-本研究的数据集是专门化的,不是一般化的。然而,研究结果表明……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Media discourse in a hyper connected society: a comparison between media frame and Twitter discourse during media strike
Purpose – This study aims to examine the impact of news frames associated with traditional media and with Twitter discourse on social issues. Design/methodology/approach – Using semantic network analysis, it identifies the role of new alternative channels as well as discussing ways of understanding and consuming news content in the changing media environment. Additionally, it focuses on the dominant Twitter communicators who rank high in betweenness centrality. Findings – The results confirmed that traditional news media tend to superficially describe main events and media strikes without comment. They tended to consciously or unconsciously favor media corporations by engendering anxiety and conflict or by restraining reports on the rationales of the strike. Twitter discourse, on the contrary, positively represents the striker's arguments and frequently reveals support of the strike. Research limitations/implications – The data set of this study was specialized, not generalized. However, the findings exte...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Another breach in the wall: copyright territoriality in Europe and its progressive erosion on the grounds of competition law Content creation and distribution in the digital single market User generated content – users, community of users and firms: toward new sources of co-innovation? Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media Copyright (and) Culture: the governance of audiovisual archives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1