基于人工神经网络的印尼洪水易感性评估

Stela Priscillia , Calogero Schillaci , Aldo Lipani
{"title":"基于人工神经网络的印尼洪水易感性评估","authors":"Stela Priscillia ,&nbsp;Calogero Schillaci ,&nbsp;Aldo Lipani","doi":"10.1016/j.aiig.2022.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Flood incidents can massively damage and disrupt a city economic or governing core. However, flood risk can be mitigated through event planning and city-wide preparation to reduce damage. For, governments, firms, and civilians to make such preparations, flood susceptibility predictions are required. To predict flood susceptibility nine environmental related factors have been identified. They are elevation, slope, curvature, topographical wetness index (TWI), Euclidean distance from a river, land-cover, stream power index (SPI), soil type and precipitation. This work will use these environmental related factors alongside Sentinel-1 satellite imagery in a model intercomparison study to back-predict flood susceptibility in Jakarta for the January 2020 historic flood event across 260 key locations. For each location, this study uses current environmental conditions to predict flood status in the following month. Considering the imbalance between instances of flooded and non-flooded conditions, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) has been implemented to balance both classes in the training set. This work compares predictions from artificial neural networks (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbors algorithms (k-NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) against a random baseline. The effects of the SMOTE are also assessed by training each model on balanced and imbalanced datasets. The ANN is found to be superior to the other machine learning models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100124,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 215-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544122000090/pdfft?md5=be9afd52112c0a20ec31a3de99a5d5da&pid=1-s2.0-S2666544122000090-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Stela Priscillia ,&nbsp;Calogero Schillaci ,&nbsp;Aldo Lipani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiig.2022.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Flood incidents can massively damage and disrupt a city economic or governing core. However, flood risk can be mitigated through event planning and city-wide preparation to reduce damage. For, governments, firms, and civilians to make such preparations, flood susceptibility predictions are required. To predict flood susceptibility nine environmental related factors have been identified. They are elevation, slope, curvature, topographical wetness index (TWI), Euclidean distance from a river, land-cover, stream power index (SPI), soil type and precipitation. This work will use these environmental related factors alongside Sentinel-1 satellite imagery in a model intercomparison study to back-predict flood susceptibility in Jakarta for the January 2020 historic flood event across 260 key locations. For each location, this study uses current environmental conditions to predict flood status in the following month. Considering the imbalance between instances of flooded and non-flooded conditions, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) has been implemented to balance both classes in the training set. This work compares predictions from artificial neural networks (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbors algorithms (k-NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) against a random baseline. The effects of the SMOTE are also assessed by training each model on balanced and imbalanced datasets. The ANN is found to be superior to the other machine learning models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 215-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544122000090/pdfft?md5=be9afd52112c0a20ec31a3de99a5d5da&pid=1-s2.0-S2666544122000090-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544122000090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666544122000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

洪水事件会严重破坏和扰乱城市的经济或治理核心。然而,洪水风险可以通过活动规划和全市范围的准备来减轻,以减少损失。政府、企业和平民要做好这样的准备,就需要进行洪水易感性预测。为了预测洪水易感性,确定了9个环境相关因子。它们是高程、坡度、曲率、地形湿度指数(TWI)、与河流的欧几里得距离、土地覆盖、河流功率指数(SPI)、土壤类型和降水。这项工作将在模型比对研究中使用这些与环境相关的因素以及Sentinel-1卫星图像,对雅加达260个关键地点2020年1月历史性洪水事件的洪水易感性进行反向预测。对于每个地点,本研究使用当前的环境条件来预测下个月的洪水状况。考虑到洪水和非洪水条件实例之间的不平衡,在训练集中实现了合成少数派过采样技术(SMOTE)来平衡这两类。这项工作比较了人工神经网络(ANN)、k-近邻算法(k-NN)和支持向量机(SVM)对随机基线的预测。通过在平衡和不平衡数据集上训练每个模型,还评估了SMOTE的效果。研究发现,人工神经网络优于其他机器学习模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flood susceptibility assessment using artificial neural networks in Indonesia

Flood incidents can massively damage and disrupt a city economic or governing core. However, flood risk can be mitigated through event planning and city-wide preparation to reduce damage. For, governments, firms, and civilians to make such preparations, flood susceptibility predictions are required. To predict flood susceptibility nine environmental related factors have been identified. They are elevation, slope, curvature, topographical wetness index (TWI), Euclidean distance from a river, land-cover, stream power index (SPI), soil type and precipitation. This work will use these environmental related factors alongside Sentinel-1 satellite imagery in a model intercomparison study to back-predict flood susceptibility in Jakarta for the January 2020 historic flood event across 260 key locations. For each location, this study uses current environmental conditions to predict flood status in the following month. Considering the imbalance between instances of flooded and non-flooded conditions, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) has been implemented to balance both classes in the training set. This work compares predictions from artificial neural networks (ANN), k-Nearest Neighbors algorithms (k-NN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) against a random baseline. The effects of the SMOTE are also assessed by training each model on balanced and imbalanced datasets. The ANN is found to be superior to the other machine learning models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Convolutional sparse coding network for sparse seismic time-frequency representation Research on the prediction method for fluvial-phase sandbody connectivity based on big data analysis--a case study of Bohai a oilfield Pore size classification and prediction based on distribution of reservoir fluid volumes utilizing well logs and deep learning algorithm in a complex lithology Benchmarking data handling strategies for landslide susceptibility modeling using random forest workflows A 3D convolutional neural network model with multiple outputs for simultaneously estimating the reactive transport parameters of sandstone from its CT images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1