荷兰语称呼选择2:荷兰语称呼选择的语用原则

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/03096564.2015.1136122
R. Vismans
{"title":"荷兰语称呼选择2:荷兰语称呼选择的语用原则","authors":"R. Vismans","doi":"10.1080/03096564.2015.1136122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper reports on research into the use of Dutch forms of address (i.e. the second-person pronouns u and je/jij) among two generations in the Netherlands. Its main aim is to determine the factors behind different choices of address pronoun. It takes the model of address choice proposed by Clyne et al. in Language and Human Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), and more specifically their concept of general pragmatic principles, as its theoretical inspiration. The research is based on a questionnaire in which respondents were asked which pronoun they used to address a variety of interlocutors. The questionnaire also asked respondents to reflect on their choice, especially if it was ambivalent (i.e. if they would address the same type of interlocutor sometimes with u and sometimes with je/jij). It is the qualitative analysis of these reflections that is the focus of this paper. Although there is some variation between the age groups’ evaluation of the importance of some principles, the article establishes (relative) age and familiarity as the leading principles in Dutch address choice. There is also a high level of meta-sociolinguistic awareness of the mechanisms behind address choice. The conclusion suggests a number of modest enhancements to Clyne et al.’s model of address choice.","PeriodicalId":41997,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"279 - 302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Address Choice in Dutch 2: Pragmatic Principles of Address Choice in Dutch\",\"authors\":\"R. Vismans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03096564.2015.1136122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper reports on research into the use of Dutch forms of address (i.e. the second-person pronouns u and je/jij) among two generations in the Netherlands. Its main aim is to determine the factors behind different choices of address pronoun. It takes the model of address choice proposed by Clyne et al. in Language and Human Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), and more specifically their concept of general pragmatic principles, as its theoretical inspiration. The research is based on a questionnaire in which respondents were asked which pronoun they used to address a variety of interlocutors. The questionnaire also asked respondents to reflect on their choice, especially if it was ambivalent (i.e. if they would address the same type of interlocutor sometimes with u and sometimes with je/jij). It is the qualitative analysis of these reflections that is the focus of this paper. Although there is some variation between the age groups’ evaluation of the importance of some principles, the article establishes (relative) age and familiarity as the leading principles in Dutch address choice. There is also a high level of meta-sociolinguistic awareness of the mechanisms behind address choice. The conclusion suggests a number of modest enhancements to Clyne et al.’s model of address choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2015.1136122\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2015.1136122","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文对荷兰两代人称呼方式(即第二人称代词u和je/jij)的使用情况进行了研究。其主要目的是确定不同称呼代词选择背后的因素。它以克莱恩等人在《语言与人际关系》(剑桥大学出版社,2009)中提出的称呼选择模型,更具体地说,是他们的一般语用原则概念作为理论灵感。这项研究基于一份调查问卷,在问卷中,受访者被问及他们在称呼各种对话者时使用的代词。问卷还要求受访者反思他们的选择,特别是如果选择是矛盾的(即,如果他们有时用u,有时用je/jij来称呼同一类型的对话者)。本文的重点是对这些反思进行定性分析。尽管不同年龄组对某些原则重要性的评价存在一定差异,但本文确定(相对)年龄和熟悉度是荷兰语称呼选择的主要原则。对称呼选择背后的机制也有高度的元社会语言学意识。该结论建议对克莱因等人的称呼选择模型进行一些适度的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Address Choice in Dutch 2: Pragmatic Principles of Address Choice in Dutch
ABSTRACT This paper reports on research into the use of Dutch forms of address (i.e. the second-person pronouns u and je/jij) among two generations in the Netherlands. Its main aim is to determine the factors behind different choices of address pronoun. It takes the model of address choice proposed by Clyne et al. in Language and Human Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), and more specifically their concept of general pragmatic principles, as its theoretical inspiration. The research is based on a questionnaire in which respondents were asked which pronoun they used to address a variety of interlocutors. The questionnaire also asked respondents to reflect on their choice, especially if it was ambivalent (i.e. if they would address the same type of interlocutor sometimes with u and sometimes with je/jij). It is the qualitative analysis of these reflections that is the focus of this paper. Although there is some variation between the age groups’ evaluation of the importance of some principles, the article establishes (relative) age and familiarity as the leading principles in Dutch address choice. There is also a high level of meta-sociolinguistic awareness of the mechanisms behind address choice. The conclusion suggests a number of modest enhancements to Clyne et al.’s model of address choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Peripheral Networks: Canon-Formation in the Nineteenth-Century Reception of Regionalist Writers Jean Crosnier and The Image of Amsterdam in L’Année Burlesque (1682) “The problem with all those teachers is that they are completely numb”: Representations of Teachers and Education in Recent Dutch Novels Two Peaks in a Barren Landscape: Turkish-Dutch Writers in the Netherlands Grand Larcenies: Translations and Imitations of Ten Dutch Poets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1