塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治如何延缓亨利·菲尔丁的怀疑

IF 0.2 3区 文学 Q2 Arts and Humanities STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 Pub Date : 2021-07-22 DOI:10.1353/sel.2020.0027
Zoe Beenstock
{"title":"塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治如何延缓亨利·菲尔丁的怀疑","authors":"Zoe Beenstock","doi":"10.1353/sel.2020.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues that Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s famous statement on the willing suspension of disbelief was borrowed from Henry Fielding’s novels Joseph Andrews and Tom Jones. Coleridge adapted Fielding’s view of fiction as a hypothetical space for interrogating the foundations of knowledge. He adopts a dilemma in Fielding’s fiction between the willing suspension of disbelief as a form of knowledge, and the notion, derived from Samuel Richardson, that aesthetic experience suspends the will. The result is a contradictory concept of the will as both present and absent in aesthetic experience, implicit in Fielding’s fictions and accentuated in Coleridge’s literary theory.","PeriodicalId":45835,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Samuel Taylor Coleridge Suspended Henry Fielding’s Disbelief\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Beenstock\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sel.2020.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article argues that Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s famous statement on the willing suspension of disbelief was borrowed from Henry Fielding’s novels Joseph Andrews and Tom Jones. Coleridge adapted Fielding’s view of fiction as a hypothetical space for interrogating the foundations of knowledge. He adopts a dilemma in Fielding’s fiction between the willing suspension of disbelief as a form of knowledge, and the notion, derived from Samuel Richardson, that aesthetic experience suspends the will. The result is a contradictory concept of the will as both present and absent in aesthetic experience, implicit in Fielding’s fictions and accentuated in Coleridge’s literary theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2020.0027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2020.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文认为,柯勒律治关于“自愿中止怀疑”的名言借鉴自亨利·菲尔丁的小说《约瑟夫·安德鲁斯》和《汤姆·琼斯》。柯勒律治改编了菲尔丁的小说观,将其作为对知识基础进行质疑的假设空间。他在菲尔丁的小说中采用了一种两难的方式,一方面是自愿地将怀疑作为一种知识形式,另一方面是塞缪尔·理查森(Samuel Richardson)提出的美学经验将意志悬置的观点。其结果是一个矛盾的概念,即意志在审美经验中既存在又不存在,隐含在菲尔丁的小说中,又在柯勒律治的文学理论中得到强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Samuel Taylor Coleridge Suspended Henry Fielding’s Disbelief
Abstract:This article argues that Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s famous statement on the willing suspension of disbelief was borrowed from Henry Fielding’s novels Joseph Andrews and Tom Jones. Coleridge adapted Fielding’s view of fiction as a hypothetical space for interrogating the foundations of knowledge. He adopts a dilemma in Fielding’s fiction between the willing suspension of disbelief as a form of knowledge, and the notion, derived from Samuel Richardson, that aesthetic experience suspends the will. The result is a contradictory concept of the will as both present and absent in aesthetic experience, implicit in Fielding’s fictions and accentuated in Coleridge’s literary theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900
STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: SEL focuses on four fields of British literature in rotating, quarterly issues: English Renaissance, Tudor and Stuart Drama, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, and Nineteenth Century. The editors select learned, readable papers that contribute significantly to the understanding of British literature from 1500 to 1900. SEL is well known for thecommissioned omnibus review of recent studies in the field that is included in each issue. In a single volume, readers might find an argument for attributing a previously unknown work to Shakespeare or de-attributing a famous work from Milton, a study ofthe connections between class and genre in the Restoration Theater.
期刊最新文献
Possible Pregnancy and All’s Well’s Uncertain Ends Shakespeare’s Henry V and the Ciphers of History Christian and Stoic Patience in King Lear Recent Studies in Tudor and Stuart Drama “The Bay Trees … Are All Withered”: Ecological Trauerspiel in Richard II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1