Liang Xiao, Shanmei Ouyang, Yuwei Li, Hongjie Wang
{"title":"基于输出波形采集与分析的磁共振成像光谱仪故障检测方法","authors":"Liang Xiao, Shanmei Ouyang, Yuwei Li, Hongjie Wang","doi":"10.1002/cmr.b.21353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the development of a magnetic resonance imaging spectrometer, the equipment fault detection methods are mainly reliant on visual inspection of reconstructed images or <i>k</i>-space data, combined with observation of the output waveforms via an oscilloscope. However, when using the above methods, it may be quite difficult to determine minor design flaws that would produce image ghost or other problems. This article presents a fault detection method that is based on acquisition and analysis of the output waveforms from the spectrometer. While a sequence is running, the spectrometer outputs, including the digital gate and the gradients, are sampled using a data acquisition card. The acquired data is then processed using a high-performance graphic processing unit to allow the feature points, which are the endpoints of the waveform segments in this design, to be extracted. The processing operation is composed of data filtering, differencing, and clustering. Finally, the extracted feature points are compared with the predefined feature points of the sequence to determine any design errors. This method has been used to solve image ghost problems in our home-built spectrometer.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50623,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","volume":"47B 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21353","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fault detection method for magnetic resonance imaging spectrometer based on the acquisition and analysis of its output waveforms\",\"authors\":\"Liang Xiao, Shanmei Ouyang, Yuwei Li, Hongjie Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cmr.b.21353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the development of a magnetic resonance imaging spectrometer, the equipment fault detection methods are mainly reliant on visual inspection of reconstructed images or <i>k</i>-space data, combined with observation of the output waveforms via an oscilloscope. However, when using the above methods, it may be quite difficult to determine minor design flaws that would produce image ghost or other problems. This article presents a fault detection method that is based on acquisition and analysis of the output waveforms from the spectrometer. While a sequence is running, the spectrometer outputs, including the digital gate and the gradients, are sampled using a data acquisition card. The acquired data is then processed using a high-performance graphic processing unit to allow the feature points, which are the endpoints of the waveform segments in this design, to be extracted. The processing operation is composed of data filtering, differencing, and clustering. Finally, the extracted feature points are compared with the predefined feature points of the sequence to determine any design errors. This method has been used to solve image ghost problems in our home-built spectrometer.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering\",\"volume\":\"47B 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cmr.b.21353\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21353\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B-Magnetic Resonance Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cmr.b.21353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fault detection method for magnetic resonance imaging spectrometer based on the acquisition and analysis of its output waveforms
In the development of a magnetic resonance imaging spectrometer, the equipment fault detection methods are mainly reliant on visual inspection of reconstructed images or k-space data, combined with observation of the output waveforms via an oscilloscope. However, when using the above methods, it may be quite difficult to determine minor design flaws that would produce image ghost or other problems. This article presents a fault detection method that is based on acquisition and analysis of the output waveforms from the spectrometer. While a sequence is running, the spectrometer outputs, including the digital gate and the gradients, are sampled using a data acquisition card. The acquired data is then processed using a high-performance graphic processing unit to allow the feature points, which are the endpoints of the waveform segments in this design, to be extracted. The processing operation is composed of data filtering, differencing, and clustering. Finally, the extracted feature points are compared with the predefined feature points of the sequence to determine any design errors. This method has been used to solve image ghost problems in our home-built spectrometer.
期刊介绍:
Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B brings together engineers and physicists involved in the design and development of hardware and software employed in magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods.
Contributors come from both academia and industry, to report the latest advancements in the development of instrumentation and computer programming to underpin medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance techniques.