COVID-19 大流行对患者生育护理的影响。

IF 1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Public Works Management & Policy Pub Date : 2022-05-06 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735221098255
Karen N DSouza, Minerva Orellana, Alessandra J Ainsworth, Gabrielle Cummings, Kirsten A Riggan, Chandra C Shenoy, Megan A Allyse
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对患者生育护理的影响。","authors":"Karen N DSouza, Minerva Orellana, Alessandra J Ainsworth, Gabrielle Cummings, Kirsten A Riggan, Chandra C Shenoy, Megan A Allyse","doi":"10.1177/23743735221098255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare system have been widespread, with many institutions in the United States pausing elective procedures to redirect resources to critical care. Fertility care and assisted reproductive procedures were classified as elective procedures and similarly paused. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and/or their partners (<i>n</i> = 25 female patients; <i>n</i> = 3 male partners) receiving care at a fertility clinic in the Midwest to understand patient appraisal of COVID-19 risk on the resumption of care following a month-long closure of an infertility clinic, and patient agreement with the clinic closure. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed from a grounded theory approach. Study participants reported an increased sense of urgency due to the delay in fertility procedures. This urgency often superseded concerns of potential COVID-19 infection, motivating patients to continue fertility treatment during a pandemic. In hindsight, some participants did not agree with the clinic's closure and treatment cessation, feeling that these steps negatively interrupted time-sensitive reproductive goals. Patient responses highlight the need for additional resources to support decision-making during times of crisis. Triaging patients based on time-sensitivity of treatment instead of a total shutdown respects patient autonomy for continuing treatment amidst uncertain COVID-19-impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":45483,"journal":{"name":"Public Works Management & Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"23743735221098255"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Fertility Care.\",\"authors\":\"Karen N DSouza, Minerva Orellana, Alessandra J Ainsworth, Gabrielle Cummings, Kirsten A Riggan, Chandra C Shenoy, Megan A Allyse\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735221098255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare system have been widespread, with many institutions in the United States pausing elective procedures to redirect resources to critical care. Fertility care and assisted reproductive procedures were classified as elective procedures and similarly paused. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and/or their partners (<i>n</i> = 25 female patients; <i>n</i> = 3 male partners) receiving care at a fertility clinic in the Midwest to understand patient appraisal of COVID-19 risk on the resumption of care following a month-long closure of an infertility clinic, and patient agreement with the clinic closure. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed from a grounded theory approach. Study participants reported an increased sense of urgency due to the delay in fertility procedures. This urgency often superseded concerns of potential COVID-19 infection, motivating patients to continue fertility treatment during a pandemic. In hindsight, some participants did not agree with the clinic's closure and treatment cessation, feeling that these steps negatively interrupted time-sensitive reproductive goals. Patient responses highlight the need for additional resources to support decision-making during times of crisis. Triaging patients based on time-sensitivity of treatment instead of a total shutdown respects patient autonomy for continuing treatment amidst uncertain COVID-19-impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Works Management & Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"23743735221098255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9083039/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Works Management & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221098255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Works Management & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221098255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行对医疗系统的影响十分广泛,美国许多医疗机构暂停了选择性手术,将资源转用于重症监护。生育护理和辅助生殖程序被归类为选择性程序,也同样被暂停。我们对在美国中西部一家不孕不育诊所接受治疗的患者和/或其伴侣(n = 25 名女性患者;n = 3 名男性伴侣)进行了定性访谈,以了解患者对不孕不育诊所关闭一个月后恢复治疗时 COVID-19 风险的评估,以及患者对诊所关闭的看法。研究人员采用基础理论方法对访谈记录进行了主题分析。研究参与者表示,由于生育程序的延迟,他们的紧迫感增加了。这种紧迫感往往超越了对潜在 COVID-19 感染的担忧,促使患者在大流行期间继续接受生育治疗。事后看来,一些参与者并不同意关闭诊所和停止治疗,认为这些措施对时间紧迫的生育目标造成了负面影响。患者的反应突出表明,在危机时期需要更多的资源来支持决策。根据治疗的时间敏感性对患者进行分流,而不是完全关闭诊所,这是对患者在 COVID-19 影响不确定的情况下继续治疗的自主权的尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Fertility Care.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare system have been widespread, with many institutions in the United States pausing elective procedures to redirect resources to critical care. Fertility care and assisted reproductive procedures were classified as elective procedures and similarly paused. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and/or their partners (n = 25 female patients; n = 3 male partners) receiving care at a fertility clinic in the Midwest to understand patient appraisal of COVID-19 risk on the resumption of care following a month-long closure of an infertility clinic, and patient agreement with the clinic closure. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed from a grounded theory approach. Study participants reported an increased sense of urgency due to the delay in fertility procedures. This urgency often superseded concerns of potential COVID-19 infection, motivating patients to continue fertility treatment during a pandemic. In hindsight, some participants did not agree with the clinic's closure and treatment cessation, feeling that these steps negatively interrupted time-sensitive reproductive goals. Patient responses highlight the need for additional resources to support decision-making during times of crisis. Triaging patients based on time-sensitivity of treatment instead of a total shutdown respects patient autonomy for continuing treatment amidst uncertain COVID-19-impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Works Management & Policy
Public Works Management & Policy PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY: RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TRANSPORTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT is a peer-reviewed journal for academics and practitioners in public works and the public and private infrastructure industries. This journal addresses the planning, financing, development, and operations of civil infrastructure systems at all levels of society— from federal policy to the demand for, and delivery of, state and local public works services. PWMP solicits manuscripts that convey research results, evaluate management innovations, suggest methods of analysis and evaluation, and examine policy issues.
期刊最新文献
Politics, Policy, and Pain: Paying for Infrastructure in Pressing Times Risky Decisions Over Troubled Waters: Public Works Directors’ Sea Level Rise Risk Attitudes Changing Tides and Changing Winds: A Time to Change Gears Persisting Cost Overruns in Public Infrastructure Projects: Lessons From the Belgian Case The Impact of Leadership Behaviour on Management Effectiveness in Public Construction Project Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1