领先的全通学校——相同还是不同?

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Leadership & Management Pub Date : 2022-05-27 DOI:10.1080/13632434.2022.2097467
A. Harris, Michelle Jones
{"title":"领先的全通学校——相同还是不同?","authors":"A. Harris, Michelle Jones","doi":"10.1080/13632434.2022.2097467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries, the idea of an All-Through school is relatively unfamiliar, as schooling tends to follow the traditional division between primary/elementary schools and secondary/high schools. Yet in some education systems, the notion of All-Through schooling is gaining momentum for a wide range of reasons, including greater cost efficiencies and the absence of distinct transition phases which can be disruptive for students (Symonds 2015). Being able to achieve greater cost effectiveness through the sharing of resources in a variety of ways is a perceived strength of an All-Through school. Undoubtedly, there are economies of scale that can be achieved through combining phases and resources i.e. the provision of staff facilities, catering, repair and maintenance, health and safety, etc. Essentially, All-Through or All-Age schools, as they are called in some systems, combine at least primary and secondary stages of education, and can also incorporate nursery and sixth forms within a single, overarching institution. This is one school comprising all or multiple phases of education overseen by one governing body. An AllThrough school often occupies a single site or will have joined its previously separate school campuses into one. Working in an All-Through institution provides the unique opportunity to make significant changes to the continuity, progression, and relevance of the curriculum. An All-Through school can also provide opportunities to enhance all aspects of community development, both within and beyond the boundaries of the school. All-Through schooling is a model reflected most clearly in the international-schools sector where combining phases is the established way of working. The literature on international schools concerns itself largely with describing and analysing the structures, processes and practices reflected within international schools. This research base, however, lacks a critical mass of robust empirical studies which makes navigating the literature difficult. While some writers touch upon the leadership of international schools (Cravens 2018), the existing evidence base on this topic is neither extensive nor conclusive. Outside the international-schools sector, this joined-up model of schooling has been adopted by many countries, to different degrees. In Iceland, all schools operate on an All-Through basis and in Spain more All Through schools are currently being established. An All-Through model of schooling is also reflected in England with All-Through Academies (Hodgson 2011) and increasingly, there are growing numbers of All-Age schools in Wales which has prompted two major, contemporary research projects. Most typically, in All-Through schools-","PeriodicalId":47255,"journal":{"name":"School Leadership & Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"231 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leading All-Through schools – the same or different?\",\"authors\":\"A. Harris, Michelle Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13632434.2022.2097467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many countries, the idea of an All-Through school is relatively unfamiliar, as schooling tends to follow the traditional division between primary/elementary schools and secondary/high schools. Yet in some education systems, the notion of All-Through schooling is gaining momentum for a wide range of reasons, including greater cost efficiencies and the absence of distinct transition phases which can be disruptive for students (Symonds 2015). Being able to achieve greater cost effectiveness through the sharing of resources in a variety of ways is a perceived strength of an All-Through school. Undoubtedly, there are economies of scale that can be achieved through combining phases and resources i.e. the provision of staff facilities, catering, repair and maintenance, health and safety, etc. Essentially, All-Through or All-Age schools, as they are called in some systems, combine at least primary and secondary stages of education, and can also incorporate nursery and sixth forms within a single, overarching institution. This is one school comprising all or multiple phases of education overseen by one governing body. An AllThrough school often occupies a single site or will have joined its previously separate school campuses into one. Working in an All-Through institution provides the unique opportunity to make significant changes to the continuity, progression, and relevance of the curriculum. An All-Through school can also provide opportunities to enhance all aspects of community development, both within and beyond the boundaries of the school. All-Through schooling is a model reflected most clearly in the international-schools sector where combining phases is the established way of working. The literature on international schools concerns itself largely with describing and analysing the structures, processes and practices reflected within international schools. This research base, however, lacks a critical mass of robust empirical studies which makes navigating the literature difficult. While some writers touch upon the leadership of international schools (Cravens 2018), the existing evidence base on this topic is neither extensive nor conclusive. Outside the international-schools sector, this joined-up model of schooling has been adopted by many countries, to different degrees. In Iceland, all schools operate on an All-Through basis and in Spain more All Through schools are currently being established. An All-Through model of schooling is also reflected in England with All-Through Academies (Hodgson 2011) and increasingly, there are growing numbers of All-Age schools in Wales which has prompted two major, contemporary research projects. Most typically, in All-Through schools-\",\"PeriodicalId\":47255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"231 - 234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Leadership & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2097467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Leadership & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2022.2097467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在许多国家,“全面教育”的概念相对陌生,因为学校教育往往遵循小学/小学和中学/高中的传统划分。然而,在一些教育系统中,由于各种原因,包括更高的成本效率和缺乏可能对学生造成破坏的明显过渡阶段,“全面教育”的概念正在获得动力(Symonds 2015)。通过各种方式的资源共享,能够实现更高的成本效益,这是一所All-Through学校公认的优势。毫无疑问,通过结合阶段和资源,即提供工作人员设施、餐饮、维修和保养、健康和安全等,可以实现规模经济。从本质上讲,在某些系统中,All-Through或All-Age学校至少结合了小学和中学阶段的教育,也可以将幼儿园和六年级纳入一个单一的总体机构。这是一所学校,由一个管理机构监督所有或多个教育阶段。all - through学校通常占用一个站点,或者将以前分开的校园合并为一个站点。在一个全面的机构工作提供了独特的机会,使重大变化的连续性,进步,和课程的相关性。全通学校还可以提供机会,在学校内外加强社区发展的各个方面。在国际学校部门,结合阶段是一种既定的工作方式,这种模式在国际学校部门得到了最清晰的反映。关于国际学校的文献主要是描述和分析国际学校的结构、过程和实践。然而,这个研究基础缺乏大量可靠的实证研究,这使得在文献中导航变得困难。虽然一些作者谈到了国际学校的领导作用(Cravens 2018),但关于这一主题的现有证据既不广泛也不确凿。在国际学校领域之外,这种联合办学模式已被许多国家在不同程度上采用。在冰岛,所有的学校都在全通的基础上运作,在西班牙,目前正在建立更多的全通学校。全通模式的学校教育也反映在英格兰的全通学院(Hodgson 2011),威尔士的全年龄学校越来越多,这促使了两个主要的当代研究项目。最典型的是,在全修学校
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leading All-Through schools – the same or different?
In many countries, the idea of an All-Through school is relatively unfamiliar, as schooling tends to follow the traditional division between primary/elementary schools and secondary/high schools. Yet in some education systems, the notion of All-Through schooling is gaining momentum for a wide range of reasons, including greater cost efficiencies and the absence of distinct transition phases which can be disruptive for students (Symonds 2015). Being able to achieve greater cost effectiveness through the sharing of resources in a variety of ways is a perceived strength of an All-Through school. Undoubtedly, there are economies of scale that can be achieved through combining phases and resources i.e. the provision of staff facilities, catering, repair and maintenance, health and safety, etc. Essentially, All-Through or All-Age schools, as they are called in some systems, combine at least primary and secondary stages of education, and can also incorporate nursery and sixth forms within a single, overarching institution. This is one school comprising all or multiple phases of education overseen by one governing body. An AllThrough school often occupies a single site or will have joined its previously separate school campuses into one. Working in an All-Through institution provides the unique opportunity to make significant changes to the continuity, progression, and relevance of the curriculum. An All-Through school can also provide opportunities to enhance all aspects of community development, both within and beyond the boundaries of the school. All-Through schooling is a model reflected most clearly in the international-schools sector where combining phases is the established way of working. The literature on international schools concerns itself largely with describing and analysing the structures, processes and practices reflected within international schools. This research base, however, lacks a critical mass of robust empirical studies which makes navigating the literature difficult. While some writers touch upon the leadership of international schools (Cravens 2018), the existing evidence base on this topic is neither extensive nor conclusive. Outside the international-schools sector, this joined-up model of schooling has been adopted by many countries, to different degrees. In Iceland, all schools operate on an All-Through basis and in Spain more All Through schools are currently being established. An All-Through model of schooling is also reflected in England with All-Through Academies (Hodgson 2011) and increasingly, there are growing numbers of All-Age schools in Wales which has prompted two major, contemporary research projects. Most typically, in All-Through schools-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Leadership & Management
School Leadership & Management EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
9.60%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: School Leadership & Management welcomes articles on all aspects of educational leadership and management. As a highly cited and internationally known SCOPUS journal, School Leadership and Management is fundamentally concerned with issues of leadership and management in classrooms, schools, and school systems. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes articles that contribute to the field in the following ways: Scholarly articles that draw upon empirical evidence to provide new insights into leadership and management practices; Scholarly articles that explore alternative, critical, and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management; Scholarly articles that provide state of the art reviews within an national or international context; Scholarly articles reporting new empirical findings that make an original contribution to the field; Scholarly articles that make a theoretical contribution which extends and deepens our understanding of the key issues associated with leadership, management, and the direct relationship with organisational change and improvement; Scholarly articles that focus primarily upon leadership and management issues but are aimed at academic, policymaking and practitioner audiences; Contributions from policymakers and practitioners, where there is a clear leadership and management focus. School Leadership & Management particularly welcomes: •articles that explore alternative, critical and re-conceptualised views of school leadership and management •articles that are written for academics but are aimed at both a practitioner and academic audience •contributions from practitioners, provided that the relationship between theory and practice is made explicit.
期刊最新文献
Note Exploring principals’ process of gathering, reflecting upon and implementing feedback from their teachers: a grounded theory From crisis leadership to digital and inclusive leadership in the aftermath of the pandemic ‘Intersectional collaboration’: a new form of leadership from the WomenEd movement Navigating uncharted waters: leadership insights from successfully reopened schools amid the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1