恐惧诉求中的自我和反应效能信息:一项元分析

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION Fonseca-Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1093/joc/jqab048
E. Bigsby, D. Albarracín
{"title":"恐惧诉求中的自我和反应效能信息:一项元分析","authors":"E. Bigsby, D. Albarracín","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqab048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fear appeals are designed to inspire intended and actual actions to avert a danger. Although prior meta-analyses report that the average effect of fear appeals is moderately positive, the role of efficacy information is not completely understood. Prior work and fear appeal theories have argued that the presence of both response and self-efficacy information improves fear appeal success but the individual impacts of each have not been properly estimated. A meta-analysis (k = 158, N = 19,736) was conducted to examine the individual and combined effects of response and self-efficacy information contained in fear appeals on behavioral intentions and behaviors. Estimating the impact of fear appeals relative to low and no fear controls, the meta-analysis showed that fear appeals had a stronger influence on behavioral outcomes when they included positive response efficacy information but did not vary as a function of including self-efficacy information or negative response efficacy information.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self- and Response Efficacy Information in Fear Appeals: A Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Bigsby, D. Albarracín\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joc/jqab048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Fear appeals are designed to inspire intended and actual actions to avert a danger. Although prior meta-analyses report that the average effect of fear appeals is moderately positive, the role of efficacy information is not completely understood. Prior work and fear appeal theories have argued that the presence of both response and self-efficacy information improves fear appeal success but the individual impacts of each have not been properly estimated. A meta-analysis (k = 158, N = 19,736) was conducted to examine the individual and combined effects of response and self-efficacy information contained in fear appeals on behavioral intentions and behaviors. Estimating the impact of fear appeals relative to low and no fear controls, the meta-analysis showed that fear appeals had a stronger influence on behavioral outcomes when they included positive response efficacy information but did not vary as a function of including self-efficacy information or negative response efficacy information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fonseca-Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fonseca-Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

恐惧呼吁的目的是激发人们采取有意的和实际的行动来避免危险。虽然先前的荟萃分析报告说,恐惧诉求的平均效果是中等积极的,但功效信息的作用并没有完全被理解。先前的研究和恐惧诉求理论认为,反应和自我效能信息的存在都能提高恐惧诉求的成功率,但两者的个体影响尚未得到适当的估计。通过meta分析(k = 158, N = 19,736)检验了恐惧诉求中包含的反应和自我效能感信息对行为意图和行为的个体和综合影响。通过对恐惧诉求相对于低恐惧控制和无恐惧控制的影响进行估计,meta分析显示,当恐惧诉求包含积极反应效能信息时,对行为结果的影响更大,但当包含自我效能信息或消极反应效能信息时,对行为结果的影响不存在变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self- and Response Efficacy Information in Fear Appeals: A Meta-Analysis
Fear appeals are designed to inspire intended and actual actions to avert a danger. Although prior meta-analyses report that the average effect of fear appeals is moderately positive, the role of efficacy information is not completely understood. Prior work and fear appeal theories have argued that the presence of both response and self-efficacy information improves fear appeal success but the individual impacts of each have not been properly estimated. A meta-analysis (k = 158, N = 19,736) was conducted to examine the individual and combined effects of response and self-efficacy information contained in fear appeals on behavioral intentions and behaviors. Estimating the impact of fear appeals relative to low and no fear controls, the meta-analysis showed that fear appeals had a stronger influence on behavioral outcomes when they included positive response efficacy information but did not vary as a function of including self-efficacy information or negative response efficacy information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Two faces of message repetition: audience favorability as a determinant of the explanatory capacities of processing fluency and message fatigue Deictic Strategies in KamaNu and Karimi’s Kimeru Song and Dance Lyrics Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19 Media stereotypes, prejudice, and preference-based reinforcement: toward the dynamic of self-reinforcing effects by integrating audience selectivity Introduction to the special issue of social media: the good, the bad, and the ugly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1