深层高温气藏高效CO2多级酸化增产

D. Gromakovskii, M. Palanivel, Alfredo López, V. Mikaelyan
{"title":"深层高温气藏高效CO2多级酸化增产","authors":"D. Gromakovskii, M. Palanivel, Alfredo López, V. Mikaelyan","doi":"10.2118/195097-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Acidizing/acid fracturing is an established method of production stimulation in carbonate reservoirs. Over time, reservoirs become depleted, gas production declines, and flowback initiation can require additional time and costs. Energizing/foaming the stimulation fluid was determined to efficiently improve stimulation results and enhance post-treatment well cleanup. The gases most commonly used to energize the treatment fluids include nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2). This paper presents and discusses the results of an effectiveness study of foamed acidizing treatments performed using multistage completions; successful production outcomes were achieved in depleted reservoirs.\n The Design-Execution-Evaluation (DEE) cycle begins with a Multistage Fracturing (MSF) well evaluation to determine whether the well is a candidate for foamed treatment. This evaluation includes studies of the reservoir data (reservoir pressure, lithology, and permeability), completion data [including fracture ports and openhole (OH) packers placement versus hole size, reservoir net pay, and lithology], and offset wells stimulation results. Foamed MSF treatments are designed to help enhance post-stimulation performance regarding cost, operational efficiency, and completion limitations. Post-job evaluation includes highlighting the treatment as well as production analysis using a numerical simulator. The post-job evaluation also serves as an input to the design of upcoming treatments.\n Foamed multistage acidizing using CO2 foam proved to be successful in terms of post-treatment kickoff, cleanup, and production compared to conventionally treated wells. This success can be attributed to the following effects: Faster post-fracture cleanup as a result of the decreased liquid volume pumped into the reservoirHigher productivity resulting from acid placement benefits enabled by introducing CO2 foam (diversion, retardation)Well delivery time reduction because the post-treatment N2 lift was eliminated as a result of CO2 energy stored in the wellbore and the reservoir\n This paper presents the study of CO2 MSF treatments compared to conventionally treated MSF wells. The study results can be used to further optimize treatment designs and improve field execution of upcoming MSF operations as well as help reduce overall well delivery time.","PeriodicalId":10908,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient CO2 Multistage Acid Stimulation in Deep Hot-Gas Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"D. Gromakovskii, M. Palanivel, Alfredo López, V. Mikaelyan\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195097-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Acidizing/acid fracturing is an established method of production stimulation in carbonate reservoirs. Over time, reservoirs become depleted, gas production declines, and flowback initiation can require additional time and costs. Energizing/foaming the stimulation fluid was determined to efficiently improve stimulation results and enhance post-treatment well cleanup. The gases most commonly used to energize the treatment fluids include nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2). This paper presents and discusses the results of an effectiveness study of foamed acidizing treatments performed using multistage completions; successful production outcomes were achieved in depleted reservoirs.\\n The Design-Execution-Evaluation (DEE) cycle begins with a Multistage Fracturing (MSF) well evaluation to determine whether the well is a candidate for foamed treatment. This evaluation includes studies of the reservoir data (reservoir pressure, lithology, and permeability), completion data [including fracture ports and openhole (OH) packers placement versus hole size, reservoir net pay, and lithology], and offset wells stimulation results. Foamed MSF treatments are designed to help enhance post-stimulation performance regarding cost, operational efficiency, and completion limitations. Post-job evaluation includes highlighting the treatment as well as production analysis using a numerical simulator. The post-job evaluation also serves as an input to the design of upcoming treatments.\\n Foamed multistage acidizing using CO2 foam proved to be successful in terms of post-treatment kickoff, cleanup, and production compared to conventionally treated wells. This success can be attributed to the following effects: Faster post-fracture cleanup as a result of the decreased liquid volume pumped into the reservoirHigher productivity resulting from acid placement benefits enabled by introducing CO2 foam (diversion, retardation)Well delivery time reduction because the post-treatment N2 lift was eliminated as a result of CO2 energy stored in the wellbore and the reservoir\\n This paper presents the study of CO2 MSF treatments compared to conventionally treated MSF wells. The study results can be used to further optimize treatment designs and improve field execution of upcoming MSF operations as well as help reduce overall well delivery time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195097-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195097-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

酸化/酸化压裂是碳酸盐岩储层增产的常用方法。随着时间的推移,储层逐渐枯竭,天然气产量下降,反排启动可能需要额外的时间和成本。对增产液进行充能/发泡,可以有效改善增产效果,并提高处理后的井眼清洁度。最常用于给处理液充能的气体包括氮气(N2)和二氧化碳(CO2)。本文介绍并讨论了采用多级完井进行泡沫酸化处理的有效性研究结果;在衰竭油藏中取得了成功的生产成果。设计-执行-评估(DEE)周期从多级压裂(MSF)井评估开始,以确定该井是否适合进行泡沫处理。该评估包括对储层数据(储层压力、岩性和渗透率)、完井数据(包括裂缝口和裸眼(OH)封隔器位置与井眼尺寸、储层净产层和岩性)以及邻井增产结果的研究。在成本、作业效率和完井限制方面,泡沫MSF处理有助于提高增产后的性能。工作后评估包括使用数值模拟器突出处理和生产分析。工作后评估也可以作为即将到来的治疗设计的输入。事实证明,与常规处理井相比,使用CO2泡沫进行多级酸化在处理后的启动、清理和生产方面都取得了成功。这一成功可归因于以下影响:由于注入储层的液体体积减少,压裂后清理速度更快;由于二氧化碳能量储存在井筒和储层中,因此消除了处理后的N2举升,从而缩短了井的交付时间,从而提高了产能。研究结果可用于进一步优化处理设计,改善即将进行的MSF作业的现场执行情况,并有助于缩短整个井的交付时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient CO2 Multistage Acid Stimulation in Deep Hot-Gas Reservoirs
Acidizing/acid fracturing is an established method of production stimulation in carbonate reservoirs. Over time, reservoirs become depleted, gas production declines, and flowback initiation can require additional time and costs. Energizing/foaming the stimulation fluid was determined to efficiently improve stimulation results and enhance post-treatment well cleanup. The gases most commonly used to energize the treatment fluids include nitrogen (N2) and carbon dioxide (CO2). This paper presents and discusses the results of an effectiveness study of foamed acidizing treatments performed using multistage completions; successful production outcomes were achieved in depleted reservoirs. The Design-Execution-Evaluation (DEE) cycle begins with a Multistage Fracturing (MSF) well evaluation to determine whether the well is a candidate for foamed treatment. This evaluation includes studies of the reservoir data (reservoir pressure, lithology, and permeability), completion data [including fracture ports and openhole (OH) packers placement versus hole size, reservoir net pay, and lithology], and offset wells stimulation results. Foamed MSF treatments are designed to help enhance post-stimulation performance regarding cost, operational efficiency, and completion limitations. Post-job evaluation includes highlighting the treatment as well as production analysis using a numerical simulator. The post-job evaluation also serves as an input to the design of upcoming treatments. Foamed multistage acidizing using CO2 foam proved to be successful in terms of post-treatment kickoff, cleanup, and production compared to conventionally treated wells. This success can be attributed to the following effects: Faster post-fracture cleanup as a result of the decreased liquid volume pumped into the reservoirHigher productivity resulting from acid placement benefits enabled by introducing CO2 foam (diversion, retardation)Well delivery time reduction because the post-treatment N2 lift was eliminated as a result of CO2 energy stored in the wellbore and the reservoir This paper presents the study of CO2 MSF treatments compared to conventionally treated MSF wells. The study results can be used to further optimize treatment designs and improve field execution of upcoming MSF operations as well as help reduce overall well delivery time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost and Time Effective Stimulation Technique in Horizontal Cemented Liner Application in Carbonate Reservoir With HPCT Hydrajetting Tools Single Trip Multizone Perforation and Gravel Pack STPP: Success Story and Lessons Learned in Malaysian Application Machine Learning and the Analysis of High-Power Electromagnetic Interaction with Subsurface Matter Acoustic Properties of Carbonate: An Experimental and Modelling Study Application of Renewable Energy in the Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1