创造性地扩展知识——创造学习

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of the Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105
P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen
{"title":"创造性地扩展知识——创造学习","authors":"P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue addresses an important arena of learning that has been neglected by the Journal of the Learning Sciences; that is, “learning in and through arts” in the context of K–12 education. Although some forms of art education (e.g., visual arts, music, design, and technology) are a part of the curriculum in many countries, the educational potential of the arts for learning the creative skills and competences that are crucial for preparing young people for an innovation-driven knowledge society has not been sufficiently explored. The multifaceted articles included in the special issue demonstrate how learning in and through arts significantly expands the scope of knowledge-creating learning (Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021) in secondary education. Such learning refers to the personal and collaborative processes of creating, sharing, and advancing shared objects, whether in reference to ideas, designs, projects, productions (e.g., performances), or practices being improved. I use here the term “knowledge” in the broadest possible sense to include what is explicit in written text or spoken discourse, implicitly and pre-reflectively informs experts’ creative habits and practices, underlies their motoric and operational competencies, and shapes their creative agency and identities (Hakkarainen, 2009). The arts are not a single discipline, but consist of many intersecting creative fields. Teaching and learning in arts in this special issue represent the visual (drawing, painting, and architecture) and performing arts (ballet and dance). Based on my review of the four articles included in the special issue, I have identified some common themes and recognized crucial differences in the art forms. My commentary is structured as follows: I first address the epistemic objects of arts learning; second, I reflect on the authentic disciplinary practices of art making; third, I consider the domain-specific and domain-general aspects of the learning arts; fourth, I consider the nonlinear pedagogy of learning arts; fifth, I discuss material embodiment; and finally, I observe the interaction between individual and collective processes","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"116 1","pages":"138 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative expansion of knowledge-creating learning\",\"authors\":\"P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue addresses an important arena of learning that has been neglected by the Journal of the Learning Sciences; that is, “learning in and through arts” in the context of K–12 education. Although some forms of art education (e.g., visual arts, music, design, and technology) are a part of the curriculum in many countries, the educational potential of the arts for learning the creative skills and competences that are crucial for preparing young people for an innovation-driven knowledge society has not been sufficiently explored. The multifaceted articles included in the special issue demonstrate how learning in and through arts significantly expands the scope of knowledge-creating learning (Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021) in secondary education. Such learning refers to the personal and collaborative processes of creating, sharing, and advancing shared objects, whether in reference to ideas, designs, projects, productions (e.g., performances), or practices being improved. I use here the term “knowledge” in the broadest possible sense to include what is explicit in written text or spoken discourse, implicitly and pre-reflectively informs experts’ creative habits and practices, underlies their motoric and operational competencies, and shapes their creative agency and identities (Hakkarainen, 2009). The arts are not a single discipline, but consist of many intersecting creative fields. Teaching and learning in arts in this special issue represent the visual (drawing, painting, and architecture) and performing arts (ballet and dance). Based on my review of the four articles included in the special issue, I have identified some common themes and recognized crucial differences in the art forms. My commentary is structured as follows: I first address the epistemic objects of arts learning; second, I reflect on the authentic disciplinary practices of art making; third, I consider the domain-specific and domain-general aspects of the learning arts; fourth, I consider the nonlinear pedagogy of learning arts; fifth, I discuss material embodiment; and finally, I observe the interaction between individual and collective processes\",\"PeriodicalId\":48043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本期特刊探讨了《学习科学杂志》所忽视的一个重要的学习领域;也就是说,在K-12教育的背景下,“通过艺术学习”。虽然某些形式的艺术教育(例如,视觉艺术、音乐、设计和技术)是许多国家课程的一部分,但艺术在学习创造性技能和能力方面的教育潜力尚未得到充分探索,这些技能和能力对于为年轻人准备一个创新驱动的知识社会至关重要。特刊中包含的多方面文章展示了在艺术中学习和通过艺术学习如何显着扩展了中学教育中知识创造学习的范围(Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021)。这种学习指的是创造、分享和推进共享对象的个人和协作过程,无论是关于想法、设计、项目、制作(如表演)还是正在改进的实践。我在这里以最广泛的意义使用“知识”一词,包括书面文本或口头话语中明确的内容,隐含地和预先反思地告知专家的创造性习惯和实践,构成他们的动力和操作能力的基础,并塑造他们的创造性代理和身份(Hakkarainen, 2009)。艺术不是一个单一的学科,而是由许多交叉的创造性领域组成的。本期特刊的艺术教学涵盖了视觉艺术(绘画、绘画和建筑)和表演艺术(芭蕾和舞蹈)。根据我对特刊中的四篇文章的回顾,我发现了一些共同的主题,并认识到艺术形式的关键差异。我的评论结构如下:我首先讨论艺术学习的认知对象;第二,反思艺术创作的本真学科实践;第三,我考虑了学习艺术的特定领域和一般领域方面;第四,学习艺术的非线性教学法;第五,论述了物质体现;最后,我观察个人和集体过程之间的相互作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creative expansion of knowledge-creating learning
This special issue addresses an important arena of learning that has been neglected by the Journal of the Learning Sciences; that is, “learning in and through arts” in the context of K–12 education. Although some forms of art education (e.g., visual arts, music, design, and technology) are a part of the curriculum in many countries, the educational potential of the arts for learning the creative skills and competences that are crucial for preparing young people for an innovation-driven knowledge society has not been sufficiently explored. The multifaceted articles included in the special issue demonstrate how learning in and through arts significantly expands the scope of knowledge-creating learning (Paavola & Hakkarainen, 2021) in secondary education. Such learning refers to the personal and collaborative processes of creating, sharing, and advancing shared objects, whether in reference to ideas, designs, projects, productions (e.g., performances), or practices being improved. I use here the term “knowledge” in the broadest possible sense to include what is explicit in written text or spoken discourse, implicitly and pre-reflectively informs experts’ creative habits and practices, underlies their motoric and operational competencies, and shapes their creative agency and identities (Hakkarainen, 2009). The arts are not a single discipline, but consist of many intersecting creative fields. Teaching and learning in arts in this special issue represent the visual (drawing, painting, and architecture) and performing arts (ballet and dance). Based on my review of the four articles included in the special issue, I have identified some common themes and recognized crucial differences in the art forms. My commentary is structured as follows: I first address the epistemic objects of arts learning; second, I reflect on the authentic disciplinary practices of art making; third, I consider the domain-specific and domain-general aspects of the learning arts; fourth, I consider the nonlinear pedagogy of learning arts; fifth, I discuss material embodiment; and finally, I observe the interaction between individual and collective processes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Reframing design in education: Proposing a framework to support pre-service teachers in adopting designerly stances The role of individual preparation before collaboration: An exploratory study on students’ computer-supported collaborative argumentation in a primary classroom Toward epistemic justice in socio-scientific decision-making: How youth make sense of lively COVID-19 and vaccines data Learning and constructions of us and them in teachers’ collaborative groups Interdisciplinary learning in the humanities: Knowledge building and identity work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1