SMPN 4增益学生的概率

Arini Mayan Fa’ani, Ulfa Masamah, Marhayati Marhayati
{"title":"SMPN 4增益学生的概率","authors":"Arini Mayan Fa’ani, Ulfa Masamah, Marhayati Marhayati","doi":"10.56013/axi.v7i1.1187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to classify student responses in dealing with probabilistic problems according totheir level, analyze, and identify indicators at each level. This study used a descriptivequalitativeapproach with data collection techniques in the form of tests and interviews which were tested on 66 seventh grade students as research subjects. The results showed that 28 students were at the subjective level, 30 students were at the transitional level, and 8 students were at the informal quantitative level, and no students were at the numerical level. In addition, there are additional indicators at the subjective and transitional levels. Meanwhile, at the informal quantitative level, there are no additional indicators.Keywords: probabilistic thinking","PeriodicalId":55794,"journal":{"name":"MaPan Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Level Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa SMPN 4 Kepanjen\",\"authors\":\"Arini Mayan Fa’ani, Ulfa Masamah, Marhayati Marhayati\",\"doi\":\"10.56013/axi.v7i1.1187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to classify student responses in dealing with probabilistic problems according totheir level, analyze, and identify indicators at each level. This study used a descriptivequalitativeapproach with data collection techniques in the form of tests and interviews which were tested on 66 seventh grade students as research subjects. The results showed that 28 students were at the subjective level, 30 students were at the transitional level, and 8 students were at the informal quantitative level, and no students were at the numerical level. In addition, there are additional indicators at the subjective and transitional levels. Meanwhile, at the informal quantitative level, there are no additional indicators.Keywords: probabilistic thinking\",\"PeriodicalId\":55794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MaPan Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MaPan Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56013/axi.v7i1.1187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MaPan Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56013/axi.v7i1.1187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在将学生在处理概率问题时的反应按其水平进行分类,分析并确定每个水平的指标。本研究采用描述性定性方法,以测试和访谈的形式收集数据,以66名七年级学生为研究对象。结果表明:主观水平28人,过渡水平30人,非正式定量水平8人,数值水平0人。此外,在主观和过渡两级还有其他指标。与此同时,在非正式的数量层面,没有额外的指标。关键词:概率思维
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Level Berpikir Probabilistik Siswa SMPN 4 Kepanjen
This study aims to classify student responses in dealing with probabilistic problems according totheir level, analyze, and identify indicators at each level. This study used a descriptivequalitativeapproach with data collection techniques in the form of tests and interviews which were tested on 66 seventh grade students as research subjects. The results showed that 28 students were at the subjective level, 30 students were at the transitional level, and 8 students were at the informal quantitative level, and no students were at the numerical level. In addition, there are additional indicators at the subjective and transitional levels. Meanwhile, at the informal quantitative level, there are no additional indicators.Keywords: probabilistic thinking
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECT OF THE POWER OF TWO METHOD.ON MATHEMATICAL REASONING ABILITY OF CLASS VIII MTs DARUL ABROR KEDUNGJATI PURBALINGGA THE CRITICAL THINKING ABILITY OF STUDENT WITH LOW PRIOR KNOWLEDGE WHO LEARN USING PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DEVELOPMENT OF INTEGRATED DISCRETE MATHEMATICS TEACHINGBOOK WITH OPS TRANSFORMATION STUDENTS’ IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF LIMIT TRIGONOMETRIC FUNCTIONS THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION JIGSAW LEARNING STUDENT LEARNING INTEREST IN THE USE OF AUGMENTED REALITY MEDIA ON TRIANGLES AND QUADRILATERALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1