学而教,教而学:教师教育辩论中提升性别意识的自我研究

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studying Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1080/17425964.2022.2149482
Celina Salvador-García
{"title":"学而教,教而学:教师教育辩论中提升性别意识的自我研究","authors":"Celina Salvador-García","doi":"10.1080/17425964.2022.2149482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Education should encourage active citizenship through a critical and transformative lens to promote a more just, equal, and inclusive society. This article presents a self-study that examines my teaching practice as a novice teacher educator. It describes my first experience using debates to discuss gender inequalities through critical pedagogy. With this study I aimed to answer: (1) What can I learn from my first attempt to use debates that focus on gender issues in teacher education to improve my teaching practices based on critical pedagogy? and (2) How can participation in debates frame pre-service teachers personal and professional views on gender issues? Data collection methods included the teacher diary, students’ surveys, exit slips and a group interview. Data analysis encompassed both more traditional techniques (i.e., data analysis spiral method) and more complex and relational methods (i.e., thinking with theory). Findings are presented through a visual network showing the connections among three categories: tensions to improve, positive lens, and awareness of gender issues. This article, therefore, makes public the knowledge built and created through my experience so that it can inform my (and potentially others’) future practice. Findings show that debates offer a variety of benefits for teacher education in terms of both pedagogical insights and raising awareness about critical issues. However, debates are not magic formulas, and they may not serve nor impact all pre-service teachers in the same way.","PeriodicalId":45793,"journal":{"name":"Studying Teacher Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"63 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning to Teach, Teaching to Learn: A self-study to Promote Gender Awareness through Debates in Teacher Education\",\"authors\":\"Celina Salvador-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17425964.2022.2149482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Education should encourage active citizenship through a critical and transformative lens to promote a more just, equal, and inclusive society. This article presents a self-study that examines my teaching practice as a novice teacher educator. It describes my first experience using debates to discuss gender inequalities through critical pedagogy. With this study I aimed to answer: (1) What can I learn from my first attempt to use debates that focus on gender issues in teacher education to improve my teaching practices based on critical pedagogy? and (2) How can participation in debates frame pre-service teachers personal and professional views on gender issues? Data collection methods included the teacher diary, students’ surveys, exit slips and a group interview. Data analysis encompassed both more traditional techniques (i.e., data analysis spiral method) and more complex and relational methods (i.e., thinking with theory). Findings are presented through a visual network showing the connections among three categories: tensions to improve, positive lens, and awareness of gender issues. This article, therefore, makes public the knowledge built and created through my experience so that it can inform my (and potentially others’) future practice. Findings show that debates offer a variety of benefits for teacher education in terms of both pedagogical insights and raising awareness about critical issues. However, debates are not magic formulas, and they may not serve nor impact all pre-service teachers in the same way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"63 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studying Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2149482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studying Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2022.2149482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教育应该通过批判和变革的视角鼓励积极的公民意识,以促进一个更加公正、平等和包容的社会。本文介绍了我作为一名初级教师教育工作者的教学实践。它描述了我第一次通过批判教学法讨论性别不平等的辩论经验。通过这项研究,我的目的是回答:(1)我可以从我的第一次尝试中学到什么,通过讨论教师教育中的性别问题来改进我基于批判教学法的教学实践?(2)参与辩论如何构建职前教师对性别问题的个人和专业观点?数据收集方法包括教师日记、学生问卷调查、离职单和小组访谈。数据分析既包括较传统的技术(即数据分析螺旋法),也包括较复杂的关联方法(即理论思维)。研究结果通过一个视觉网络呈现,显示了三类之间的联系:改善的紧张关系、积极的镜头和对性别问题的认识。因此,本文公开了通过我的经验建立和创造的知识,以便它可以为我(以及潜在的其他人)未来的实践提供信息。研究结果表明,辩论在教学见解和提高对关键问题的认识方面为教师教育提供了各种好处。然而,辩论不是神奇的公式,它们可能不会以同样的方式服务或影响所有职前教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning to Teach, Teaching to Learn: A self-study to Promote Gender Awareness through Debates in Teacher Education
ABSTRACT Education should encourage active citizenship through a critical and transformative lens to promote a more just, equal, and inclusive society. This article presents a self-study that examines my teaching practice as a novice teacher educator. It describes my first experience using debates to discuss gender inequalities through critical pedagogy. With this study I aimed to answer: (1) What can I learn from my first attempt to use debates that focus on gender issues in teacher education to improve my teaching practices based on critical pedagogy? and (2) How can participation in debates frame pre-service teachers personal and professional views on gender issues? Data collection methods included the teacher diary, students’ surveys, exit slips and a group interview. Data analysis encompassed both more traditional techniques (i.e., data analysis spiral method) and more complex and relational methods (i.e., thinking with theory). Findings are presented through a visual network showing the connections among three categories: tensions to improve, positive lens, and awareness of gender issues. This article, therefore, makes public the knowledge built and created through my experience so that it can inform my (and potentially others’) future practice. Findings show that debates offer a variety of benefits for teacher education in terms of both pedagogical insights and raising awareness about critical issues. However, debates are not magic formulas, and they may not serve nor impact all pre-service teachers in the same way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studying Teacher Education
Studying Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
43.80%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Studying Teacher Education invites submissions from authors who have a strong interest in improving the quality of teaching generally and of teacher education in particular. The central purpose of the journal is to disseminate high-quality research and dialogue in self-study of teacher education practices. Thus the journal is primarily a forum for teacher educators who work in contexts and programs of teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing Methods, Data Collection, and Trustworthiness in Self-Study Research: A Content Analysis of the First 19 Volumes of Studying Teacher Education Self-Study As Reflective Practice and Active Engagement Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) As a Critical Friend: The Affordances and Limitations Self-Study Navigating Boundaries of Race, Culture, Language and Context Experiencing Tensions When Integrating Language Diversity into Mathematics Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1