{"title":"学术话语中多元化的语义轨迹观察","authors":"J. Terrier","doi":"10.3167/choc.2018.130106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.\nIt presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution\non the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline\n(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it\nreferences the rich German debate and the important French intellectual\ndevelopments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the\nadversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates\non political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,\nof a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,\neven by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary\nunity.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse\",\"authors\":\"J. Terrier\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/choc.2018.130106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.\\nIt presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution\\non the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline\\n(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it\\nreferences the rich German debate and the important French intellectual\\ndevelopments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the\\nadversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates\\non political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,\\nof a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,\\neven by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary\\nunity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse
Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.
It presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution
on the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline
(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it
references the rich German debate and the important French intellectual
developments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the
adversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates
on political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,
of a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,
even by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary
unity.