学术话语中多元化的语义轨迹观察

J. Terrier
{"title":"学术话语中多元化的语义轨迹观察","authors":"J. Terrier","doi":"10.3167/choc.2018.130106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.\nIt presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution\non the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline\n(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it\nreferences the rich German debate and the important French intellectual\ndevelopments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the\nadversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates\non political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,\nof a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,\neven by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary\nunity.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse\",\"authors\":\"J. Terrier\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/choc.2018.130106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.\\nIt presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution\\non the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline\\n(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it\\nreferences the rich German debate and the important French intellectual\\ndevelopments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the\\nadversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates\\non political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,\\nof a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,\\neven by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary\\nunity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to the History of Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讲述了多元主义作为一个学术话语术语的历史。它介绍了关于这个问题的现有研究,并在不局限于一个学科(哲学或政治学)或一个语言领域的包容性方法的基础上做出了贡献。特别是,它引用了丰富的德国辩论和重要的法国智力发展。此外,它不仅考虑了多元主义的支持者,也考虑了反对者。在关于政治多元化的辩论中,有两个反复出现的因素。一个是存在,甚至在多元主义的批评者中,在某种程度上承认多元性。另一个是倡导必要的团结,即使是那些强烈强调冲突和异议的作者也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse
Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse. It presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution on the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline (philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it references the rich German debate and the important French intellectual developments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the adversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates on political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism, of a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy, even by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary unity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Contributions to the History of Concepts is no longer published by Brill from 2010.
期刊最新文献
Desencanto in the Spanish Transition (1977–1982) From Empires of Nations to the Nation-State of Minorities Generation Marx The Mainstreaming of Global Inequality, 1980–2020 Early Modern Terminology for Dialect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1