基于威布尔参数估计的风能潜力评估Aquila优化算法

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Wind and Structures Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.3390/wind2040033
A. A. Abou El‐Ela, R. El-Sehiemy, A. Shaheen, Ayman S. Shalaby
{"title":"基于威布尔参数估计的风能潜力评估Aquila优化算法","authors":"A. A. Abou El‐Ela, R. El-Sehiemy, A. Shaheen, Ayman S. Shalaby","doi":"10.3390/wind2040033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistical distribution approaches have been developed to describe wind data due to the intermittent and unpredictable nature of wind speed. The Weibull distribution with two parameters is thought to be the most accurate distribution for modeling wind data. This study seeks wind energy assessment via searching for the optimal estimation of the Weibull parameters. For this target, analytical and heuristic methods are investigated. The analytical methods involve the maximum likelihood, moment, energy pattern factor, and empirical methods, while the heuristic optimization algorithms include particle warm optimization and the Aquila optimizer (AO). Both analytical and heuristic methods are assessed together to fit the probability density function of wind data. In addition, nine models are submitted to find the most appropriate model to represent wind energy production. The error between actual and estimated wind energy density is computed to the model for each study site which has less error of energy. The fit test is performed with real data for the Zafarana and Shark El-Ouinate sites in Egypt for a year. Additionally, different indicators of fitness properties are assessed, such as the root mean square error, determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error, and wind production deviation. The simulation results declare that the proposed AO optimization algorithm offers greater accuracy than several optimization algorithms in the literature for estimating the Weibull parameters. Furthermore, statistical analysis of the compared methods demonstrates the high stability of the AO algorithm. Thus, the proposed AO has greater accuracy and more stability in the obtained outcomes for Weibull parameters and wind energy calculations.","PeriodicalId":51210,"journal":{"name":"Wind and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aquila Optimization Algorithm for Wind Energy Potential Assessment Relying on Weibull Parameters Estimation\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Abou El‐Ela, R. El-Sehiemy, A. Shaheen, Ayman S. Shalaby\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/wind2040033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statistical distribution approaches have been developed to describe wind data due to the intermittent and unpredictable nature of wind speed. The Weibull distribution with two parameters is thought to be the most accurate distribution for modeling wind data. This study seeks wind energy assessment via searching for the optimal estimation of the Weibull parameters. For this target, analytical and heuristic methods are investigated. The analytical methods involve the maximum likelihood, moment, energy pattern factor, and empirical methods, while the heuristic optimization algorithms include particle warm optimization and the Aquila optimizer (AO). Both analytical and heuristic methods are assessed together to fit the probability density function of wind data. In addition, nine models are submitted to find the most appropriate model to represent wind energy production. The error between actual and estimated wind energy density is computed to the model for each study site which has less error of energy. The fit test is performed with real data for the Zafarana and Shark El-Ouinate sites in Egypt for a year. Additionally, different indicators of fitness properties are assessed, such as the root mean square error, determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error, and wind production deviation. The simulation results declare that the proposed AO optimization algorithm offers greater accuracy than several optimization algorithms in the literature for estimating the Weibull parameters. Furthermore, statistical analysis of the compared methods demonstrates the high stability of the AO algorithm. Thus, the proposed AO has greater accuracy and more stability in the obtained outcomes for Weibull parameters and wind energy calculations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2040033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2040033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

由于风速的间歇性和不可预测性,已经发展出统计分布方法来描述风数据。具有两个参数的威布尔分布被认为是对风数据建模最准确的分布。本研究通过寻找威布尔参数的最优估计来寻求风能评价。针对这一目标,研究了解析法和启发式方法。分析方法包括最大似然法、矩法、能量模式因子法和经验法,启发式优化算法包括粒子热优化和Aquila优化器(AO)。分析方法和启发式方法一起进行评估,以拟合风数据的概率密度函数。此外,还提交了9个模型,以寻找最适合代表风能生产的模型。对能量误差较小的每个研究点的模型,计算实际风能密度与估计风能密度的误差。适合性测试是用埃及Zafarana和Shark El-Ouinate地点一年的真实数据进行的。此外,还评估了适应度特性的不同指标,如均方根误差、决定系数(R2)、平均绝对误差和产风偏差。仿真结果表明,所提出的AO优化算法在估计威布尔参数方面比文献中的几种优化算法具有更高的精度。此外,统计分析表明,AO算法具有较高的稳定性。因此,所提出的AO在威布尔参数和风能计算中获得的结果具有更高的准确性和稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aquila Optimization Algorithm for Wind Energy Potential Assessment Relying on Weibull Parameters Estimation
Statistical distribution approaches have been developed to describe wind data due to the intermittent and unpredictable nature of wind speed. The Weibull distribution with two parameters is thought to be the most accurate distribution for modeling wind data. This study seeks wind energy assessment via searching for the optimal estimation of the Weibull parameters. For this target, analytical and heuristic methods are investigated. The analytical methods involve the maximum likelihood, moment, energy pattern factor, and empirical methods, while the heuristic optimization algorithms include particle warm optimization and the Aquila optimizer (AO). Both analytical and heuristic methods are assessed together to fit the probability density function of wind data. In addition, nine models are submitted to find the most appropriate model to represent wind energy production. The error between actual and estimated wind energy density is computed to the model for each study site which has less error of energy. The fit test is performed with real data for the Zafarana and Shark El-Ouinate sites in Egypt for a year. Additionally, different indicators of fitness properties are assessed, such as the root mean square error, determination coefficient (R2), mean absolute error, and wind production deviation. The simulation results declare that the proposed AO optimization algorithm offers greater accuracy than several optimization algorithms in the literature for estimating the Weibull parameters. Furthermore, statistical analysis of the compared methods demonstrates the high stability of the AO algorithm. Thus, the proposed AO has greater accuracy and more stability in the obtained outcomes for Weibull parameters and wind energy calculations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The WIND AND STRUCTURES, An International Journal, aims at: - Major publication channel for research in the general area of wind and structural engineering, - Wider distribution at more affordable subscription rates; - Faster reviewing and publication for manuscripts submitted. The main theme of the Journal is the wind effects on structures. Areas covered by the journal include: Wind loads and structural response, Bluff-body aerodynamics, Computational method, Wind tunnel modeling, Local wind environment, Codes and regulations, Wind effects on large scale structures.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Perspectives of Wind Energy Technology Responses of a Modular Floating Wind TLP of MarsVAWT Supporting a 10 MW Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Wind Power Forecasting in a Semi-Arid Region Based on Machine Learning Error Correction Scaling Challenges for Conical Plain Bearings as Wind Turbine Main Bearings Numerical Modeling and Application of Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Arrays in Large Wind Farms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1