{"title":"液压胀形试验对AA5754-T4和AA6061-T6应力-应变曲线的实验分析评价","authors":"Hugo Campos , Abel D. Santos , Rui Amaral","doi":"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (<em>p</em>), radius of curvature (<em>ρ</em>) and pole thickness (<em>t</em>). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (<em>p, ρ, t</em>) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10198,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages e244-e248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and analytical evaluation of the stress-strain curves of AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6 by hydraulic bulge test\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Campos , Abel D. Santos , Rui Amaral\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (<em>p</em>), radius of curvature (<em>ρ</em>) and pole thickness (<em>t</em>). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (<em>p, ρ, t</em>) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e244-e248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental and analytical evaluation of the stress-strain curves of AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6 by hydraulic bulge test
The hydraulic bulge test can be used as a means to achieve large uniform plastic strains under biaxial stress conditions, applied to hardening curve determination of sheet metal materials. The larger information on hardening behaviour is the reason why a mechanical characterization system has been developed to determine stress-strain curve by reading bulge test variables: bulge pressure (p), radius of curvature (ρ) and pole thickness (t). The determination of stress-strain curve may be based on continuous data acquisition from bulge test results (p, ρ, t) or from the use of analytical equations relating these variables with dome height. In this paper it is presented a study comparing different methodologies to obtain stress-strain curve by means of analytical methodologies relating “dome height with pole thickness” evolution. It is shown that these existent methodologies to determine pole thickness don’t apply when compared with experimental values and they show an evident dispersion among them. Therefore a better analytical methodology is proposed and tested. The study and corresponding material characterization is applied to two aluminium alloys, AA5754-T4 and AA6061-T6, currently used in automotive industry.