执行控制满足语义的中间地带:语义控制的神经基质在地形上夹在多需求和默认模式系统之间

R. Chiou, E. Jefferies, J. Duncan, Gina F. Humphreys, M. L. Lambon Ralph
{"title":"执行控制满足语义的中间地带:语义控制的神经基质在地形上夹在多需求和默认模式系统之间","authors":"R. Chiou, E. Jefferies, J. Duncan, Gina F. Humphreys, M. L. Lambon Ralph","doi":"10.1101/2021.11.26.470178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic control is the capability to operate on meaningful representations, selectively focusing on certain aspects of meaning while purposefully ignoring other aspects based on one’s behavioural aim. This ability is especially vital for comprehending figurative/ambiguous language. It remains unclear, at the topographical level, why/how regions involved in semantic control seem reliably juxtaposed alongside other functionally specialised regions in the association cortex. We investigated this issue by characterising how semantic control regions topographically relate to the default-mode network (associated with memory and abstract cognition) and multiple-demand network (associated with executive control). Topographically, we confirmed that semantic control areas were sandwiched by the default-mode and multi-demand networks, forming an orderly arrangement observed both at the individual- and group-level. Functionally, semantic control regions exhibited ‘hybrid’ responses, fusing a preference for cognitively demanding processing (multiple-demand) and a preference for meaningful representations (default-mode) into a domain-specific preference for difficult operations on meaningful representations. When projected onto the principal gradient of human connectome, the neural activity of semantic control showed a robustly dissociable trajectory from visuospatial control, implying different roles in the functional transition from sensation to cognition. We discuss why the hybrid functional profile of semantic control regions might result from their intermediate topographical positions.","PeriodicalId":9825,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","volume":"1995 1","pages":"4512 - 4526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A middle ground where executive control meets semantics: the neural substrates of semantic control are topographically sandwiched between the multiple-demand and default-mode systems\",\"authors\":\"R. Chiou, E. Jefferies, J. Duncan, Gina F. Humphreys, M. L. Lambon Ralph\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2021.11.26.470178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantic control is the capability to operate on meaningful representations, selectively focusing on certain aspects of meaning while purposefully ignoring other aspects based on one’s behavioural aim. This ability is especially vital for comprehending figurative/ambiguous language. It remains unclear, at the topographical level, why/how regions involved in semantic control seem reliably juxtaposed alongside other functionally specialised regions in the association cortex. We investigated this issue by characterising how semantic control regions topographically relate to the default-mode network (associated with memory and abstract cognition) and multiple-demand network (associated with executive control). Topographically, we confirmed that semantic control areas were sandwiched by the default-mode and multi-demand networks, forming an orderly arrangement observed both at the individual- and group-level. Functionally, semantic control regions exhibited ‘hybrid’ responses, fusing a preference for cognitively demanding processing (multiple-demand) and a preference for meaningful representations (default-mode) into a domain-specific preference for difficult operations on meaningful representations. When projected onto the principal gradient of human connectome, the neural activity of semantic control showed a robustly dissociable trajectory from visuospatial control, implying different roles in the functional transition from sensation to cognition. We discuss why the hybrid functional profile of semantic control regions might result from their intermediate topographical positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"volume\":\"1995 1\",\"pages\":\"4512 - 4526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.26.470178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.26.470178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

语义控制是对有意义的表征进行操作的能力,有选择地关注意义的某些方面,而基于一个人的行为目标有目的地忽略其他方面。这种能力对于理解比喻性或模棱两可的语言尤为重要。目前尚不清楚,在地形水平上,为什么/如何参与语义控制的区域似乎可靠地与联想皮层中其他功能专门化的区域并列。我们通过描述语义控制区域在地形上如何与默认模式网络(与记忆和抽象认知相关)和多需求网络(与执行控制相关)相关来研究这个问题。在地形上,我们证实了语义控制区域被默认模式和多需求网络夹在中间,形成了一个在个人和群体层面都能观察到的有序安排。在功能上,语义控制区域表现出“混合”反应,将对认知要求处理的偏好(多需求)和对有意义表征的偏好(默认模式)融合为对有意义表征的困难操作的特定领域偏好。当投射到人类连接组的主梯度上时,语义控制的神经活动与视觉空间控制的神经活动表现出明显的可分离轨迹,这意味着从感觉到认知的功能转变中存在不同的作用。我们讨论了为什么语义控制区域的混合功能轮廓可能是由它们的中间地形位置造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A middle ground where executive control meets semantics: the neural substrates of semantic control are topographically sandwiched between the multiple-demand and default-mode systems
Semantic control is the capability to operate on meaningful representations, selectively focusing on certain aspects of meaning while purposefully ignoring other aspects based on one’s behavioural aim. This ability is especially vital for comprehending figurative/ambiguous language. It remains unclear, at the topographical level, why/how regions involved in semantic control seem reliably juxtaposed alongside other functionally specialised regions in the association cortex. We investigated this issue by characterising how semantic control regions topographically relate to the default-mode network (associated with memory and abstract cognition) and multiple-demand network (associated with executive control). Topographically, we confirmed that semantic control areas were sandwiched by the default-mode and multi-demand networks, forming an orderly arrangement observed both at the individual- and group-level. Functionally, semantic control regions exhibited ‘hybrid’ responses, fusing a preference for cognitively demanding processing (multiple-demand) and a preference for meaningful representations (default-mode) into a domain-specific preference for difficult operations on meaningful representations. When projected onto the principal gradient of human connectome, the neural activity of semantic control showed a robustly dissociable trajectory from visuospatial control, implying different roles in the functional transition from sensation to cognition. We discuss why the hybrid functional profile of semantic control regions might result from their intermediate topographical positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Consistently increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity during the exposure to acute stressors Conditioning and pseudoconditioning differently change intrinsic excitability of inhibitory interneurons in the neocortex Phonological properties of logographic words modulate brain activation in bilinguals: a comparative study of Chinese characters and Japanese Kanji Inferior parietal cortex represents relational structures for explicit transitive inference In vivo ephaptic coupling allows memory network formation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1