罗氏扩增和多重PCR在人分枝杆菌感染诊断中的应用

D. Liu, S. Lloyd Jones, R. Baird, J. Pedersen
{"title":"罗氏扩增和多重PCR在人分枝杆菌感染诊断中的应用","authors":"D. Liu,&nbsp;S. Lloyd Jones,&nbsp;R. Baird,&nbsp;J. Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/S1386-2618(97)00008-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to determine various mycobacterial species rapidly and precisely is important for the control and prevention of mycobacterial infections in the human population. In the present study, we evaluated the Roche Amplicor <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> test and the Amplicor <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em> test, as well as a multiplex PCR, for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections using 86 clinical (sputum and bronchial washing) and culture specimens from 50 human patients. The Roche Amplicor <em>M. tuberculosis</em> test and the Amplicor <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em> test appeared to be highly sensitive and specific for direct detection of <em>M. tuberculosis</em> and <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em>, respectively, from clinical specimens. The use of culture derivatives was not necessary. Nonetheless, the Roche Amplicor tests had limited value in identifying other mycobacterial species as these mycobacteria invariably displayed negative reactions in the assays. The multiplex PCR, on the other hand, was capable of differentiating <em>M. tuberculosis, M. avium</em> and <em>M. intracellulare</em> from other mycobacterial species using culture specimens at relatively low cost. However, the multiplex PCR generated inconsistent results when clinical samples were used. Only 42 (48.8%) of the 86 sputum and bronchial washing specimens showed clear, specific electrophoretic bands in the multiplex PCR. Future optimisation of a hybridisation-based detection system is essential for enhanced identification of mycobacteria directly from clinical specimens by the multiplex PCR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100988,"journal":{"name":"Opportunistic Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1386-2618(97)00008-1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Roche Amplicor and multiplex PCR for diagnosis of human mycobacterial infections\",\"authors\":\"D. Liu,&nbsp;S. Lloyd Jones,&nbsp;R. Baird,&nbsp;J. Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1386-2618(97)00008-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The ability to determine various mycobacterial species rapidly and precisely is important for the control and prevention of mycobacterial infections in the human population. In the present study, we evaluated the Roche Amplicor <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> test and the Amplicor <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em> test, as well as a multiplex PCR, for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections using 86 clinical (sputum and bronchial washing) and culture specimens from 50 human patients. The Roche Amplicor <em>M. tuberculosis</em> test and the Amplicor <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em> test appeared to be highly sensitive and specific for direct detection of <em>M. tuberculosis</em> and <em>M. avium/M. intracellulare</em>, respectively, from clinical specimens. The use of culture derivatives was not necessary. Nonetheless, the Roche Amplicor tests had limited value in identifying other mycobacterial species as these mycobacteria invariably displayed negative reactions in the assays. The multiplex PCR, on the other hand, was capable of differentiating <em>M. tuberculosis, M. avium</em> and <em>M. intracellulare</em> from other mycobacterial species using culture specimens at relatively low cost. However, the multiplex PCR generated inconsistent results when clinical samples were used. Only 42 (48.8%) of the 86 sputum and bronchial washing specimens showed clear, specific electrophoretic bands in the multiplex PCR. Future optimisation of a hybridisation-based detection system is essential for enhanced identification of mycobacteria directly from clinical specimens by the multiplex PCR.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opportunistic Pathogens\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1386-2618(97)00008-1\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opportunistic Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386261897000081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opportunistic Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386261897000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

快速准确地确定各种分枝杆菌种类的能力对于控制和预防人群中的分枝杆菌感染非常重要。在本研究中,我们评估了Roche Amplicor结核分枝杆菌试验和Amplicor M. avium/M。利用来自50名人类患者的86份临床(痰液和支气管洗涤)和培养标本进行细胞内试验和多重PCR诊断分枝杆菌感染。罗氏扩增结核分枝杆菌试验和扩增结核分枝杆菌/M。细胞内试验对直接检测结核分枝杆菌和鸟分枝杆菌具有高度的敏感性和特异性。细胞内,分别来自临床标本。没有必要使用文化衍生品。尽管如此,罗氏扩增试验在鉴定其他分枝杆菌种类方面的价值有限,因为这些分枝杆菌在检测中总是显示阴性反应。另一方面,多重PCR能够以相对较低的成本利用培养标本将结核分枝杆菌、鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌与其他分枝杆菌种类区分开来。然而,当使用临床样本时,多重PCR产生的结果不一致。86例痰和支气管洗涤标本中,仅有42例(48.8%)在多重PCR中显示清晰、特异的电泳条带。未来基于杂交的检测系统的优化对于通过多重PCR直接从临床标本中增强分枝杆菌的鉴定至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of Roche Amplicor and multiplex PCR for diagnosis of human mycobacterial infections

The ability to determine various mycobacterial species rapidly and precisely is important for the control and prevention of mycobacterial infections in the human population. In the present study, we evaluated the Roche Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis test and the Amplicor M. avium/M. intracellulare test, as well as a multiplex PCR, for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections using 86 clinical (sputum and bronchial washing) and culture specimens from 50 human patients. The Roche Amplicor M. tuberculosis test and the Amplicor M. avium/M. intracellulare test appeared to be highly sensitive and specific for direct detection of M. tuberculosis and M. avium/M. intracellulare, respectively, from clinical specimens. The use of culture derivatives was not necessary. Nonetheless, the Roche Amplicor tests had limited value in identifying other mycobacterial species as these mycobacteria invariably displayed negative reactions in the assays. The multiplex PCR, on the other hand, was capable of differentiating M. tuberculosis, M. avium and M. intracellulare from other mycobacterial species using culture specimens at relatively low cost. However, the multiplex PCR generated inconsistent results when clinical samples were used. Only 42 (48.8%) of the 86 sputum and bronchial washing specimens showed clear, specific electrophoretic bands in the multiplex PCR. Future optimisation of a hybridisation-based detection system is essential for enhanced identification of mycobacteria directly from clinical specimens by the multiplex PCR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Rapid differentiation of Microsporum dermatophytes based on arbitrarily primed PCR amplification Serum levels of antibodies against Candida albicans in healthy women during pregnancy A simple ELISA capable of distinguishing between IgG antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae Application of polymerase chain reaction to the detection of cytomegalovirus in bronchoalveolar lavage from lung transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1