几种地中海药用植物中生物活性成分的提取工艺设计

Q3 Chemical Engineering Chemical engineering transactions Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI:10.3303/CET2186222
Konstantina M. Laina, P. Eleni, Konstantina G. Tsitseli, M. Krokida
{"title":"几种地中海药用植物中生物活性成分的提取工艺设计","authors":"Konstantina M. Laina, P. Eleni, Konstantina G. Tsitseli, M. Krokida","doi":"10.3303/CET2186222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was the optimization of the extraction process of several medicinal plants of the Mediterranean flora, and their extracts’ further evaluation regarding their potential biological activity. This work aimed to design and optimize the extraction method for recovering the targeted compounds from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) and chamomile (Matricaria recutita) towards the extraction yield and quality of the extracts.Raw materials were collected, dried, and ground in desired particle sizes (200, 500, 1000 µm). Ethanol was used as solvent; and extraction was performed using conventional extraction methods (Soxhlet), as well as novel extraction techniques (Ultrasound Assisted Extraction (UAE), Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE) and their combination (UAE-MAE)). The optimized parameters were Ultrasound and Microwave intensity, and extraction time. All extracts were evaluated towards their total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity. TPC was determined by Folin–Ciocalteu method, while the antioxidant activity was estimated with the DPPH assay.Optimum particle size was 500 µm for rosemary, and 1000 µm for both St. John’s wort and chamomile. In general, the increase of extraction time leads to increase of efficiency. However, the extraction time is not an independent variable, since the ultrasound and microwave intensities affect the yield. In specific, the increment of intensity in both techniques, as well as their combination, increases the efficiency of the extraction and reduces the time. Moreover, it was observed that after a certain intensity value the yield remains constant or slightly decreases, due to degradation phenomena. Thus, the optimum ultrasound intensity for rosemary and chamomile was 450 W, while for St. John’s wort was 700 W. Regarding microwave extraction parameters, for all tested plants the value of 200 W was selected as optimum, except for St. John’s wort (200 W). The optimum set of values were also selected for UAE-MAE. Results also indicate that the extracts were rich in phenolic compounds, possessing also a remarkable antioxidant activity in all the organic solvent systems tested.","PeriodicalId":9695,"journal":{"name":"Chemical engineering transactions","volume":"2 1","pages":"1327-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Design for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Several Mediterranean Medicinal Plants\",\"authors\":\"Konstantina M. Laina, P. Eleni, Konstantina G. Tsitseli, M. Krokida\",\"doi\":\"10.3303/CET2186222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study was the optimization of the extraction process of several medicinal plants of the Mediterranean flora, and their extracts’ further evaluation regarding their potential biological activity. This work aimed to design and optimize the extraction method for recovering the targeted compounds from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) and chamomile (Matricaria recutita) towards the extraction yield and quality of the extracts.Raw materials were collected, dried, and ground in desired particle sizes (200, 500, 1000 µm). Ethanol was used as solvent; and extraction was performed using conventional extraction methods (Soxhlet), as well as novel extraction techniques (Ultrasound Assisted Extraction (UAE), Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE) and their combination (UAE-MAE)). The optimized parameters were Ultrasound and Microwave intensity, and extraction time. All extracts were evaluated towards their total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity. TPC was determined by Folin–Ciocalteu method, while the antioxidant activity was estimated with the DPPH assay.Optimum particle size was 500 µm for rosemary, and 1000 µm for both St. John’s wort and chamomile. In general, the increase of extraction time leads to increase of efficiency. However, the extraction time is not an independent variable, since the ultrasound and microwave intensities affect the yield. In specific, the increment of intensity in both techniques, as well as their combination, increases the efficiency of the extraction and reduces the time. Moreover, it was observed that after a certain intensity value the yield remains constant or slightly decreases, due to degradation phenomena. Thus, the optimum ultrasound intensity for rosemary and chamomile was 450 W, while for St. John’s wort was 700 W. Regarding microwave extraction parameters, for all tested plants the value of 200 W was selected as optimum, except for St. John’s wort (200 W). The optimum set of values were also selected for UAE-MAE. Results also indicate that the extracts were rich in phenolic compounds, possessing also a remarkable antioxidant activity in all the organic solvent systems tested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical engineering transactions\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"1327-1332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical engineering transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemical Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical engineering transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2186222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是对几种地中海地区药用植物的提取工艺进行优化,并对其提取物的潜在生物活性进行进一步评价。本研究旨在设计和优化从迷迭香、贯叶连翘和洋甘菊中提取目标化合物的方法,以提高其提取率和质量。收集、干燥和研磨所需的粒径(200、500、1000µm)的原料。以乙醇为溶剂;采用传统提取方法(Soxhlet)和新型提取技术(超声辅助提取(UAE)、微波辅助提取(MAE)及其联合提取(UAE-MAE)进行提取。最佳提取参数为超声、微波强度、提取时间。对各提取物的总酚含量(TPC)、总黄酮含量(TFC)和抗氧化活性进行评价。用Folin-Ciocalteu法测定TPC,用DPPH法测定抗氧化活性。迷迭香最佳粒径为500µm,圣约翰草和洋甘菊最佳粒径均为1000µm。一般来说,萃取时间的增加导致萃取效率的提高。然而,提取时间不是一个独立的变量,因为超声和微波强度影响收率。具体来说,两种技术强度的增加,以及它们的组合,提高了提取效率,减少了时间。此外,在达到一定强度值后,由于降解现象,产量保持不变或略有下降。因此,迷迭香和洋甘菊的最佳超声强度为450 W,而圣约翰草的最佳超声强度为700 W。在微波提取参数方面,除圣约翰草(St. John 's wort)为200 W外,所有被试植物均选择200 W为最佳提取参数。UAE-MAE也选择了最佳提取参数集。结果还表明,该提取物富含酚类化合物,在所有有机溶剂体系中均具有显著的抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Process Design for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Several Mediterranean Medicinal Plants
The objective of this study was the optimization of the extraction process of several medicinal plants of the Mediterranean flora, and their extracts’ further evaluation regarding their potential biological activity. This work aimed to design and optimize the extraction method for recovering the targeted compounds from rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) and chamomile (Matricaria recutita) towards the extraction yield and quality of the extracts.Raw materials were collected, dried, and ground in desired particle sizes (200, 500, 1000 µm). Ethanol was used as solvent; and extraction was performed using conventional extraction methods (Soxhlet), as well as novel extraction techniques (Ultrasound Assisted Extraction (UAE), Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE) and their combination (UAE-MAE)). The optimized parameters were Ultrasound and Microwave intensity, and extraction time. All extracts were evaluated towards their total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity. TPC was determined by Folin–Ciocalteu method, while the antioxidant activity was estimated with the DPPH assay.Optimum particle size was 500 µm for rosemary, and 1000 µm for both St. John’s wort and chamomile. In general, the increase of extraction time leads to increase of efficiency. However, the extraction time is not an independent variable, since the ultrasound and microwave intensities affect the yield. In specific, the increment of intensity in both techniques, as well as their combination, increases the efficiency of the extraction and reduces the time. Moreover, it was observed that after a certain intensity value the yield remains constant or slightly decreases, due to degradation phenomena. Thus, the optimum ultrasound intensity for rosemary and chamomile was 450 W, while for St. John’s wort was 700 W. Regarding microwave extraction parameters, for all tested plants the value of 200 W was selected as optimum, except for St. John’s wort (200 W). The optimum set of values were also selected for UAE-MAE. Results also indicate that the extracts were rich in phenolic compounds, possessing also a remarkable antioxidant activity in all the organic solvent systems tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical engineering transactions
Chemical engineering transactions Chemical Engineering-Chemical Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Chemical Engineering Transactions (CET) aims to be a leading international journal for publication of original research and review articles in chemical, process, and environmental engineering. CET begin in 2002 as a vehicle for publication of high-quality papers in chemical engineering, connected with leading international conferences. In 2014, CET opened a new era as an internationally-recognised journal. Articles containing original research results, covering any aspect from molecular phenomena through to industrial case studies and design, with a strong influence of chemical engineering methodologies and ethos are particularly welcome. We encourage state-of-the-art contributions relating to the future of industrial processing, sustainable design, as well as transdisciplinary research that goes beyond the conventional bounds of chemical engineering. Short reviews on hot topics, emerging technologies, and other areas of high interest should highlight unsolved challenges and provide clear directions for future research. The journal publishes periodically with approximately 6 volumes per year. Core topic areas: -Batch processing- Biotechnology- Circular economy and integration- Environmental engineering- Fluid flow and fluid mechanics- Green materials and processing- Heat and mass transfer- Innovation engineering- Life cycle analysis and optimisation- Modelling and simulation- Operations and supply chain management- Particle technology- Process dynamics, flexibility, and control- Process integration and design- Process intensification and optimisation- Process safety- Product development- Reaction engineering- Renewable energy- Separation processes- Smart industry, city, and agriculture- Sustainability- Systems engineering- Thermodynamic- Waste minimisation, processing and management- Water and wastewater engineering
期刊最新文献
Incorporation of a Filter Media by Cellulose Fibers in Biosafety from Sugarcane Bagasse by Alkaline Hydrolysis Air Deterioration Gases in the Social Confinement Period by COVID-19 in Bogotá, Quito, Lima, Santiago de Chile and Buenos Aires Modelling of Methanol Synthesis The Potential of Liquefied Oxygen Storage for Flexible Oxygen-Pressure Swing Adsorption Unit Optimal Operational Profiles in an Electrodialysis Unit for Ion Recovery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1