认知训练研究的全球趋势:基于CiteSpace的制图与文献计量分析

M. Karim, J. Venkatachalam
{"title":"认知训练研究的全球趋势:基于CiteSpace的制图与文献计量分析","authors":"M. Karim, J. Venkatachalam","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/zvq6w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread utility of cognitive training has enhanced its value throughout the lifespan of human being by the way of maintaining cognitive performance, reducing neuropsychiatric illnesses, restoring its abilities and preventing cognitive decline. The objective of this study was to investigate the global trend of the literature related to cognitive training research. Publication records related to cognitive training were obtained from web of science (WoS) core collection during the period between 1996 and 2020. CiteSpace 5.7.2.0 version software was used mapping and bibliometric analysis. The extracted records were analyzed by using bibliometric approaches such as dual-overlay analysis, author co-citation analysis (ACA), document co-citation analysis (DCA) and keyword analysis. Overall, 4,528 records were retrieved during the period between 1996 and 2020. It was found that the publication records were increased steadily on recent five years (2016-2020). The US academic institutions and journals were still played a dominant role on cognitive training field. However, University College London (UCL) is the highest publication records (108) and centrality value (0.10). Through the document co-citation analysis(DCA), it was found that applying cognitive training on various diseases viz., alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and Parkinson disease as the predominant trending, followed by training effects, interventions among school-age children, as well as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) stand out on the studies of cognitive training research. The most recent burst keywords such as ‘age difference,’ ‘brain plasticity,’ ‘cognitive intervention,’ ‘validation,’ and ‘virtual reality’ were considered to be the indicators of emerging trends.","PeriodicalId":37371,"journal":{"name":"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Trends on Studies with Cognitive Training: Mapping and Bibliometric Analysis Using CiteSpace\",\"authors\":\"M. Karim, J. Venkatachalam\",\"doi\":\"10.31234/osf.io/zvq6w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The widespread utility of cognitive training has enhanced its value throughout the lifespan of human being by the way of maintaining cognitive performance, reducing neuropsychiatric illnesses, restoring its abilities and preventing cognitive decline. The objective of this study was to investigate the global trend of the literature related to cognitive training research. Publication records related to cognitive training were obtained from web of science (WoS) core collection during the period between 1996 and 2020. CiteSpace 5.7.2.0 version software was used mapping and bibliometric analysis. The extracted records were analyzed by using bibliometric approaches such as dual-overlay analysis, author co-citation analysis (ACA), document co-citation analysis (DCA) and keyword analysis. Overall, 4,528 records were retrieved during the period between 1996 and 2020. It was found that the publication records were increased steadily on recent five years (2016-2020). The US academic institutions and journals were still played a dominant role on cognitive training field. However, University College London (UCL) is the highest publication records (108) and centrality value (0.10). Through the document co-citation analysis(DCA), it was found that applying cognitive training on various diseases viz., alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and Parkinson disease as the predominant trending, followed by training effects, interventions among school-age children, as well as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) stand out on the studies of cognitive training research. The most recent burst keywords such as ‘age difference,’ ‘brain plasticity,’ ‘cognitive intervention,’ ‘validation,’ and ‘virtual reality’ were considered to be the indicators of emerging trends.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zvq6w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zvq6w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

认知训练的广泛应用,通过维持认知能力、减少神经精神疾病、恢复能力和防止认知能力下降,增强了认知训练在人的一生中的价值。本研究旨在探讨认知训练相关文献的全球发展趋势。从web of science (WoS)核心馆藏中获取1996 - 2020年期间与认知训练相关的出版物记录。采用CiteSpace 5.7.2.0版本软件进行制图和文献计量学分析。采用双叠加分析、作者共被引分析(ACA)、文献共被引分析(DCA)和关键词分析等文献计量学方法对提取的文献进行分析。在1996年至2020年期间,总共检索了4,528条记录。研究发现,近5年(2016-2020年)论文发表量稳步增长。美国的学术机构和期刊在认知训练领域仍然占据主导地位。然而,伦敦大学学院(UCL)是最高的发表记录(108)和中心性值(0.10)。通过文献共引分析(DCA)发现认知训练在认知训练研究中以阿尔茨海默病、痴呆、帕金森病等多种疾病的应用为主导趋势,其次是训练效果、学龄儿童干预、经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)等。最近,“年龄差异”、“大脑可塑性”、“认知干预”、“验证”、“虚拟现实”等关键词被认为是新趋势的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global Trends on Studies with Cognitive Training: Mapping and Bibliometric Analysis Using CiteSpace
The widespread utility of cognitive training has enhanced its value throughout the lifespan of human being by the way of maintaining cognitive performance, reducing neuropsychiatric illnesses, restoring its abilities and preventing cognitive decline. The objective of this study was to investigate the global trend of the literature related to cognitive training research. Publication records related to cognitive training were obtained from web of science (WoS) core collection during the period between 1996 and 2020. CiteSpace 5.7.2.0 version software was used mapping and bibliometric analysis. The extracted records were analyzed by using bibliometric approaches such as dual-overlay analysis, author co-citation analysis (ACA), document co-citation analysis (DCA) and keyword analysis. Overall, 4,528 records were retrieved during the period between 1996 and 2020. It was found that the publication records were increased steadily on recent five years (2016-2020). The US academic institutions and journals were still played a dominant role on cognitive training field. However, University College London (UCL) is the highest publication records (108) and centrality value (0.10). Through the document co-citation analysis(DCA), it was found that applying cognitive training on various diseases viz., alzheimer’s disease, dementia, and Parkinson disease as the predominant trending, followed by training effects, interventions among school-age children, as well as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) stand out on the studies of cognitive training research. The most recent burst keywords such as ‘age difference,’ ‘brain plasticity,’ ‘cognitive intervention,’ ‘validation,’ and ‘virtual reality’ were considered to be the indicators of emerging trends.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal
Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal publishes contributions from all areas of cognitive science, focusing on disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to information processing and behavior analysis. We encourage contributions from the following domains: psychology, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, linguistics, ethology, anthropology and philosophy of mind. The journal covers empirical studies and theoretical reviews that expand our understanding of cognitive, neural, and behavioral mechanisms. Both fundamental and applied studies are welcomed. On occasions, special issues will be covering particular themes, under the editorship of invited experts.
期刊最新文献
Do you believe that aliens feel pain? An empirical investigation of mental state attributions Civic engagement during times of crisis: Personal motivations of Romanian adults at the onset of the war in Ukraine The leader’s other-oriented perfectionism, followers’ job stress and workplace well-being in the context of multiple team membership: The moderator role of pressure to be performant Components of the university learning environment, academic burnout, and shame among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach The relationship between cognitive functions and disinhibition: Observations of cognitively impaired patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1