从过去的经验中学习:以往传染病和COVID-19中心理困扰的风险和保护因素的系统综述

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-28 DOI:10.31580/JRP.V3I1.1805
Amna Chaudhry, B. Kazmi, Shaharzade Sharjeel, Zobiah Akhtar, S. Shahid
{"title":"从过去的经验中学习:以往传染病和COVID-19中心理困扰的风险和保护因素的系统综述","authors":"Amna Chaudhry, B. Kazmi, Shaharzade Sharjeel, Zobiah Akhtar, S. Shahid","doi":"10.31580/JRP.V3I1.1805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 and the resulting social and economic lockdown has reportedly given rise to mental health issues globally. Existing literature suggests some groups experience higher psychological distress during pandemics than others. This systematic literature review highlights risk and protective factors that make these groups more vulnerable to psychological distress during an epidemic. We focus on trauma symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression studied in clinical science literature between 2010 and 2020, focusing on the SARS, MERS, Ebola, H1N1 and Zika virus epidemics, and draw parallels with COVID-19. Since out of the 29 selected studies, most included in this review focus on symptoms rather than risk factors, this paper determines these factors by identifying comparative statistics noted in findings. Gender, age, location, economic factors, information access, media exposure, being infected or knowing an infected person, and stigma around infection are risk factors isolated for negative psychological outcomes. Protective factors identified are religion, social support, and strong leadership. A missing focus on minority and underserved populations across cultures was noted. We recommend that media exposure be regulated and trauma screening at primary healthcare level be used to identify at-risk individuals. Additionally, interventions should incorporate preventative measures against mental health problems for high-risk populations, including educational programs de-stigmatizing infection. \n ","PeriodicalId":51771,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from the Past: A Systematic Review on Risk and Protective Factors for Psychological Distress in Past Infectious Epidemics and COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Amna Chaudhry, B. Kazmi, Shaharzade Sharjeel, Zobiah Akhtar, S. Shahid\",\"doi\":\"10.31580/JRP.V3I1.1805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"COVID-19 and the resulting social and economic lockdown has reportedly given rise to mental health issues globally. Existing literature suggests some groups experience higher psychological distress during pandemics than others. This systematic literature review highlights risk and protective factors that make these groups more vulnerable to psychological distress during an epidemic. We focus on trauma symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression studied in clinical science literature between 2010 and 2020, focusing on the SARS, MERS, Ebola, H1N1 and Zika virus epidemics, and draw parallels with COVID-19. Since out of the 29 selected studies, most included in this review focus on symptoms rather than risk factors, this paper determines these factors by identifying comparative statistics noted in findings. Gender, age, location, economic factors, information access, media exposure, being infected or knowing an infected person, and stigma around infection are risk factors isolated for negative psychological outcomes. Protective factors identified are religion, social support, and strong leadership. A missing focus on minority and underserved populations across cultures was noted. We recommend that media exposure be regulated and trauma screening at primary healthcare level be used to identify at-risk individuals. Additionally, interventions should incorporate preventative measures against mental health problems for high-risk populations, including educational programs de-stigmatizing infection. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":51771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31580/JRP.V3I1.1805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31580/JRP.V3I1.1805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

据报道,新冠肺炎及其引发的社会和经济封锁在全球范围内引发了心理健康问题。现有文献表明,在大流行期间,一些群体比其他群体经历更大的心理困扰。这一系统的文献综述强调了使这些群体在流行病期间更容易受到心理困扰的风险和保护因素。我们关注2010年至2020年间临床科学文献中研究的创伤症状、创伤后应激障碍、焦虑和抑郁,重点关注SARS、MERS、埃博拉、H1N1和寨卡病毒流行,并将其与COVID-19进行比较。由于在选定的29项研究中,大多数纳入本综述的研究侧重于症状而不是危险因素,因此本文通过确定研究结果中提到的比较统计数据来确定这些因素。性别、年龄、地点、经济因素、信息获取、媒体接触、被感染或认识被感染的人,以及围绕感染的污名化,都是导致负面心理后果的孤立风险因素。确定的保护因素是宗教、社会支持和强有力的领导。有人指出,对不同文化的少数民族和服务不足人口缺乏关注。我们建议控制媒体暴露,并在初级卫生保健水平上使用创伤筛查来识别高危人群。此外,干预措施应包括针对高危人群的心理健康问题的预防措施,包括消除对感染的污名化的教育方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning from the Past: A Systematic Review on Risk and Protective Factors for Psychological Distress in Past Infectious Epidemics and COVID-19
COVID-19 and the resulting social and economic lockdown has reportedly given rise to mental health issues globally. Existing literature suggests some groups experience higher psychological distress during pandemics than others. This systematic literature review highlights risk and protective factors that make these groups more vulnerable to psychological distress during an epidemic. We focus on trauma symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression studied in clinical science literature between 2010 and 2020, focusing on the SARS, MERS, Ebola, H1N1 and Zika virus epidemics, and draw parallels with COVID-19. Since out of the 29 selected studies, most included in this review focus on symptoms rather than risk factors, this paper determines these factors by identifying comparative statistics noted in findings. Gender, age, location, economic factors, information access, media exposure, being infected or knowing an infected person, and stigma around infection are risk factors isolated for negative psychological outcomes. Protective factors identified are religion, social support, and strong leadership. A missing focus on minority and underserved populations across cultures was noted. We recommend that media exposure be regulated and trauma screening at primary healthcare level be used to identify at-risk individuals. Additionally, interventions should incorporate preventative measures against mental health problems for high-risk populations, including educational programs de-stigmatizing infection.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The Role of Biological Differences in Sexual Self-Concept and Mental Health in Homosexual and Heterosexual Women Effect of Job Crafting on Faculty’s Job Satisfaction and Performance; The Moderating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. The Impact of Academic Self-efficacy, E-learning Adoption and Academic Motivation on Self-rated Academic Performance of University Students Are You Bored With Your Skincare Brand? The Need for Variety and Brand Switching Intention on Skincare Products A Measure of Romantic Love: The Psychometric Properties of the Love Bank Inventory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1