混合人类和机器学习算法预测欧洲股市

Germán G. Creamer, Yasuaki Sakamoto, J. Nickerson, Yong Ren
{"title":"混合人类和机器学习算法预测欧洲股市","authors":"Germán G. Creamer, Yasuaki Sakamoto, J. Nickerson, Yong Ren","doi":"10.1155/2023/5847887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the power of news sentiment to predict financial returns, particularly the returns of a set of European stocks. Building on past decision support work going back to the Delphi method, this paper describes a text analysis expert weighting algorithm that aggregates the responses of both humans and algorithms by dynamically selecting the best answer according to previous performance. The proposed system is tested through an experiment in which ensembles of experts, crowds, and machines analyzed Thomson Reuters news stories and predicted the returns of the relevant stocks mentioned right after the stories appeared. In most cases, the expert weighting algorithm was better than or as good as the best algorithm or human. The algorithm’s capacity to dynamically select the best answers from humans and machines results in an evolving collective intelligence: the final decision is an aggregation of the best automated individual answers, some of which come from machines and some from humans. Additionally, this paper shows that the groups of humans, algorithms, and expert weighting algorithms have associated with them, particularly, news topics that these groups are good at making predictions from.","PeriodicalId":72654,"journal":{"name":"Complex psychiatry","volume":"19 1","pages":"5847887:1-5847887:20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Human and Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast the European Stock Market\",\"authors\":\"Germán G. Creamer, Yasuaki Sakamoto, J. Nickerson, Yong Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/5847887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the power of news sentiment to predict financial returns, particularly the returns of a set of European stocks. Building on past decision support work going back to the Delphi method, this paper describes a text analysis expert weighting algorithm that aggregates the responses of both humans and algorithms by dynamically selecting the best answer according to previous performance. The proposed system is tested through an experiment in which ensembles of experts, crowds, and machines analyzed Thomson Reuters news stories and predicted the returns of the relevant stocks mentioned right after the stories appeared. In most cases, the expert weighting algorithm was better than or as good as the best algorithm or human. The algorithm’s capacity to dynamically select the best answers from humans and machines results in an evolving collective intelligence: the final decision is an aggregation of the best automated individual answers, some of which come from machines and some from humans. Additionally, this paper shows that the groups of humans, algorithms, and expert weighting algorithms have associated with them, particularly, news topics that these groups are good at making predictions from.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complex psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"5847887:1-5847887:20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complex psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5847887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5847887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了新闻情绪预测金融回报的能力,特别是一组欧洲股票的回报。基于过去的决策支持工作可以追溯到德尔菲方法,本文描述了一种文本分析专家加权算法,该算法通过根据以前的表现动态选择最佳答案来聚合人类和算法的响应。该系统通过一项实验进行了测试,在该实验中,专家、人群和机器组合分析了汤森路透的新闻报道,并在报道出现后立即预测了相关股票的回报。在大多数情况下,专家加权算法优于或不亚于最佳算法或人。该算法动态地从人类和机器中选择最佳答案的能力导致了一种不断进化的集体智能:最终的决策是最佳自动化个人答案的集合,其中一些来自机器,一些来自人类。此外,本文还显示了人类群体、算法和专家加权算法与它们相关联,特别是这些群体擅长做出预测的新闻主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybrid Human and Machine Learning Algorithms to Forecast the European Stock Market
This paper explores the power of news sentiment to predict financial returns, particularly the returns of a set of European stocks. Building on past decision support work going back to the Delphi method, this paper describes a text analysis expert weighting algorithm that aggregates the responses of both humans and algorithms by dynamically selecting the best answer according to previous performance. The proposed system is tested through an experiment in which ensembles of experts, crowds, and machines analyzed Thomson Reuters news stories and predicted the returns of the relevant stocks mentioned right after the stories appeared. In most cases, the expert weighting algorithm was better than or as good as the best algorithm or human. The algorithm’s capacity to dynamically select the best answers from humans and machines results in an evolving collective intelligence: the final decision is an aggregation of the best automated individual answers, some of which come from machines and some from humans. Additionally, this paper shows that the groups of humans, algorithms, and expert weighting algorithms have associated with them, particularly, news topics that these groups are good at making predictions from.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic Alterations in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Comprehensive Review of Molecular Markers. Olfactory Epithelium Infection by SARS-CoV-2: Possible Neuroinflammatory Consequences of COVID-19. Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Psychiatric Side Effects: A Review Internet-Based Trauma Recovery Intervention for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1