Aline Ponzoni, G. G. Souza, L. R. Sampaio, I. Argimon
{"title":"用于评价道德判断的道德困境工具:系统综述","authors":"Aline Ponzoni, G. G. Souza, L. R. Sampaio, I. Argimon","doi":"10.9788/cp2022.1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"orality is an essential element of the human being, who, on many occasions, needs to face complex and stressful decisions. Techniques with moral dilemmas are considered a standard methodology in moral judgment studies. One of the traditional dilemmas is the “Trolley Problem”; using it as a model, sets of moral dilemmas were developed and adapted to diff erent research objectives, but there is no consensus regarding its psychometric properties. Similarly, assessment instruments with moral dilemmas have been developed: the Moral Judgment Interview and the Moral Competence Test are some of the best known. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment instruments with moral dilemmas, used to assess moral judgment, in surveys conducted between 2010 and 2020, period with a signifi cant increase in publications on this topic. For this, a systematic review of literature was carried out using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo databases, following the PRISMA protocol. 354 studies were found, of which 8 were selected, containing the following instruments: Moral Competence Test (MCT), Moral Judgment Test (MJT), Moral Sense Test (MST), Moral Thinking and Communication (MTC) and Moral Judgments of Sport Managers Instrument (MJSMI). It is also important to consider that 90 of the excluded studies contained varied sets of dilemmas. In conclusion, in this analysis, few studies using assessment instruments were found and the predominant use was of sets adapted to the objectives of each research.","PeriodicalId":33882,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instrumentos de Dilemas Morais Utilizados para Avaliar Julgamento Moral: Revisão Sistemática\",\"authors\":\"Aline Ponzoni, G. G. Souza, L. R. Sampaio, I. Argimon\",\"doi\":\"10.9788/cp2022.1-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"orality is an essential element of the human being, who, on many occasions, needs to face complex and stressful decisions. Techniques with moral dilemmas are considered a standard methodology in moral judgment studies. One of the traditional dilemmas is the “Trolley Problem”; using it as a model, sets of moral dilemmas were developed and adapted to diff erent research objectives, but there is no consensus regarding its psychometric properties. Similarly, assessment instruments with moral dilemmas have been developed: the Moral Judgment Interview and the Moral Competence Test are some of the best known. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment instruments with moral dilemmas, used to assess moral judgment, in surveys conducted between 2010 and 2020, period with a signifi cant increase in publications on this topic. For this, a systematic review of literature was carried out using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo databases, following the PRISMA protocol. 354 studies were found, of which 8 were selected, containing the following instruments: Moral Competence Test (MCT), Moral Judgment Test (MJT), Moral Sense Test (MST), Moral Thinking and Communication (MTC) and Moral Judgments of Sport Managers Instrument (MJSMI). It is also important to consider that 90 of the excluded studies contained varied sets of dilemmas. In conclusion, in this analysis, few studies using assessment instruments were found and the predominant use was of sets adapted to the objectives of each research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9788/cp2022.1-01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/cp2022.1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
口才是人类的基本要素,在很多情况下,我们需要面对复杂而有压力的决定。道德困境技术被认为是道德判断研究中的一种标准方法。传统困境之一是“电车问题”;以其为模型,开发了一系列道德困境,并根据不同的研究目标进行了调整,但对其心理测量特性尚无共识。同样,道德困境的评估工具也被开发出来:道德判断面试和道德能力测试是其中最著名的。本研究的目的是调查2010年至2020年期间进行的调查中用于评估道德判断的带有道德困境的评估工具,这一时期有关该主题的出版物显著增加。为此,根据PRISMA协议,使用PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus和PsycInfo数据库对文献进行了系统综述。共发现354项研究,其中选择8项,包含以下工具:道德能力测试(MCT)、道德判断测试(MJT)、道德感测试(MST)、道德思维与沟通(MTC)和体育管理者道德判断测试(MJSMI)。同样重要的是要考虑到,被排除的研究中有90项包含各种各样的困境。总之,在这一分析中,很少发现使用评估工具的研究,主要使用的是适应每项研究目标的集合。
Instrumentos de Dilemas Morais Utilizados para Avaliar Julgamento Moral: Revisão Sistemática
orality is an essential element of the human being, who, on many occasions, needs to face complex and stressful decisions. Techniques with moral dilemmas are considered a standard methodology in moral judgment studies. One of the traditional dilemmas is the “Trolley Problem”; using it as a model, sets of moral dilemmas were developed and adapted to diff erent research objectives, but there is no consensus regarding its psychometric properties. Similarly, assessment instruments with moral dilemmas have been developed: the Moral Judgment Interview and the Moral Competence Test are some of the best known. The aim of this study was to investigate the assessment instruments with moral dilemmas, used to assess moral judgment, in surveys conducted between 2010 and 2020, period with a signifi cant increase in publications on this topic. For this, a systematic review of literature was carried out using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo databases, following the PRISMA protocol. 354 studies were found, of which 8 were selected, containing the following instruments: Moral Competence Test (MCT), Moral Judgment Test (MJT), Moral Sense Test (MST), Moral Thinking and Communication (MTC) and Moral Judgments of Sport Managers Instrument (MJSMI). It is also important to consider that 90 of the excluded studies contained varied sets of dilemmas. In conclusion, in this analysis, few studies using assessment instruments were found and the predominant use was of sets adapted to the objectives of each research.