Hee-jin Kim, Hye-Jin Kim, Jintaek Jeon, Sang-Jip Oh, K. Nam, K. Shim, J. Jung, K. Kim, Y. Choi, Sang-Ho Kim, A. Jang
{"title":"韩国传统农场和动物福利农场鸡腿肉品质和生物活性成分的比较","authors":"Hee-jin Kim, Hye-Jin Kim, Jintaek Jeon, Sang-Jip Oh, K. Nam, K. Shim, J. Jung, K. Kim, Y. Choi, Sang-Ho Kim, A. Jang","doi":"10.5536/kjps.2018.45.4.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to evaluate the difference in the quality of chicken thigh meat from conventional and animal welfare farms during refrigeration storage over 9 days. Chicken thigh meat from conventional (CTC, n = 30) and animal welfare farms (CTW, n = 30) was tested. The pH value was significantly lower in CTW (6.28) than in CTC (6.37) on day 1; however, no significant differences were found on subsequent days. The yellowness of CTW was higher than that of CTC on day 1, but CTW showed lower yellowness than did CTC on day 7 and 9. The cooking loss, water holding capacity, lightness, redness, and coliform levels of CTC did not show any significant difference when compared with CTW during storage. The shear force of CTW was significantly higher than that of CTC on day 1, 3, 7, and 9. Total microorganism and coliform in CTC and CTW increased with increasing storage days. On day 7 and 9, the total microorganism level of CTW was lower than that of CTC. The thiobarbituric acid value of CTW was lower than that of CTC on day 9. The volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) of CTW was lower than that of CTC during storage. Anserine content and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl(DPPH) scavenging activity of CTW was significantly higher than CTC on day 1. These results suggest that CTW stayed fresher for longer than did CTC because of low total microorganism level on day 7 and 9, and VBN during refrigerated storage. (","PeriodicalId":17845,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Quality and Bioactive Compounds in Chicken Thigh Meat from Conventional and Animal Welfare Farm in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Hee-jin Kim, Hye-Jin Kim, Jintaek Jeon, Sang-Jip Oh, K. Nam, K. Shim, J. Jung, K. Kim, Y. Choi, Sang-Ho Kim, A. Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.5536/kjps.2018.45.4.261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was conducted to evaluate the difference in the quality of chicken thigh meat from conventional and animal welfare farms during refrigeration storage over 9 days. Chicken thigh meat from conventional (CTC, n = 30) and animal welfare farms (CTW, n = 30) was tested. The pH value was significantly lower in CTW (6.28) than in CTC (6.37) on day 1; however, no significant differences were found on subsequent days. The yellowness of CTW was higher than that of CTC on day 1, but CTW showed lower yellowness than did CTC on day 7 and 9. The cooking loss, water holding capacity, lightness, redness, and coliform levels of CTC did not show any significant difference when compared with CTW during storage. The shear force of CTW was significantly higher than that of CTC on day 1, 3, 7, and 9. Total microorganism and coliform in CTC and CTW increased with increasing storage days. On day 7 and 9, the total microorganism level of CTW was lower than that of CTC. The thiobarbituric acid value of CTW was lower than that of CTC on day 9. The volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) of CTW was lower than that of CTC during storage. Anserine content and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl(DPPH) scavenging activity of CTW was significantly higher than CTC on day 1. These results suggest that CTW stayed fresher for longer than did CTC because of low total microorganism level on day 7 and 9, and VBN during refrigerated storage. (\",\"PeriodicalId\":17845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Poultry Science\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Poultry Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2018.45.4.261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2018.45.4.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
本研究旨在评估来自传统农场和动物福利农场的鸡腿肉在冷藏9天以上的质量差异。选取传统农场(CTC, n = 30)和动物福利农场(CTW, n = 30)的鸡腿肉进行试验。第1天CTW组的pH值(6.28)显著低于CTC组(6.37);然而,在随后的几天里,没有发现明显的差异。第1天CTW黄度高于CTC,第7、9天CTW黄度低于CTC。贮藏期间,CTC的蒸煮损失、保水能力、亮度、红度和大肠菌群水平与CTW相比无显著差异。CTW在第1、3、7、9天的剪切力显著高于CTC。随着贮存天数的增加,CTC和CTW中总微生物和大肠菌群数量均有所增加。第7天和第9天,CTW的微生物总水平低于CTC。第9天CTW的硫代巴比妥酸值低于CTC。在贮藏过程中,CTW的挥发性碱性氮(VBN)低于CTC。第1天,CTW的鹅胺含量和清除1,1-二苯基-2-苦味酰肼(DPPH)的能力显著高于CTC。综上所述,由于CTW在第7天和第9天的总微生物水平较低,而VBN在冷藏过程中比CTC保鲜时间更长。(
Comparison of Quality and Bioactive Compounds in Chicken Thigh Meat from Conventional and Animal Welfare Farm in Korea
This study was conducted to evaluate the difference in the quality of chicken thigh meat from conventional and animal welfare farms during refrigeration storage over 9 days. Chicken thigh meat from conventional (CTC, n = 30) and animal welfare farms (CTW, n = 30) was tested. The pH value was significantly lower in CTW (6.28) than in CTC (6.37) on day 1; however, no significant differences were found on subsequent days. The yellowness of CTW was higher than that of CTC on day 1, but CTW showed lower yellowness than did CTC on day 7 and 9. The cooking loss, water holding capacity, lightness, redness, and coliform levels of CTC did not show any significant difference when compared with CTW during storage. The shear force of CTW was significantly higher than that of CTC on day 1, 3, 7, and 9. Total microorganism and coliform in CTC and CTW increased with increasing storage days. On day 7 and 9, the total microorganism level of CTW was lower than that of CTC. The thiobarbituric acid value of CTW was lower than that of CTC on day 9. The volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) of CTW was lower than that of CTC during storage. Anserine content and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl(DPPH) scavenging activity of CTW was significantly higher than CTC on day 1. These results suggest that CTW stayed fresher for longer than did CTC because of low total microorganism level on day 7 and 9, and VBN during refrigerated storage. (