潮汐能发电:结合兰开斯特0-D发电和成本模型的案例研究

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1680/jener.22.00077
David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis
{"title":"潮汐能发电:结合兰开斯特0-D发电和成本模型的案例研究","authors":"David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis","doi":"10.1680/jener.22.00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":48776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models\",\"authors\":\"David Vandercruyssen, S. Baker, D. Howard, G. Aggidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jener.22.00077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jener.22.00077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jener.22.00077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财政可行性和政治意愿最终决定潮汐能发电计划是否得到开发。这项研究的目的是证明一个强大的系统,可以对潮差方案的资本成本进行初步估计,从而可以在系统和选项之间进行比较。平准化能源成本(LCOE)用于比较潮汐差拦河坝(莫克姆湾)和沿海潮汐泻湖(北威尔士);这些方案是在其他常见能源的背景下制定的。结果表明,莫克姆湾拦河坝产生的电力略高于北威尔士沿海泻湖,而且蓄水时间较短,成本较低。然而,这两种方案的经济论据是相似的;正如LCOE所示,两者都是可行的。尽管在财政上可行,但资金来源可能仍然是一个问题。讨论了财务回报和两种潜在的公共资助机制。使用两个简单模型的方法为更详细的分析提供了强有力的理由,在当前的环境、经济和社会气候下,必须做出严肃的决定。·使用5个主要组件对潮差案例研究的资本成本进行初步估计·发电机额定功率、涡轮机和水闸数量的优化·平差能源成本(LCOE)。·收入和资金机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tidal range power generation: case studies combining the Lancaster 0-D generation and cost models
Financial viability and political will ultimately determine if tidal range power schemes are developed. This research aims to demonstrate a robust system to make initial estimates of capital costs for tidal range schemes that can be compared between systems and options. A levelised cost of energy (LCOE) is used to compare a tidal range barrage (Morecambe Bay) and a coastal tidal lagoon (North Wales); the schemes are set in context with other common energy sources. The results show the Morecambe Bay barrage generates marginally more electricity than the North Wales coastal lagoon and has a shorter impoundment at lower cost. However, the economic arguments for both schemes are similar; both are viable as the LCOE shows. Despite being shown to be financially viable, the sources of funding may remain a problem. Financial returns and two potential public funding mechanisms are discussed. The approach using two simple models makes a strong case for more detailed analysis and, in the current environmental, economic, and social climate serious decisions must be taken. Highlights · Initial estimation of capital cost for tidal range case studies using 5-main components · Optimisation of generator rating, number of turbines and sluices · Levelised cost of energy (LCOE). · Revenue and funding mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Energy addresses the challenges of energy engineering in the 21st century. The journal publishes groundbreaking papers on energy provision by leading figures in industry and academia and provides a unique forum for discussion on everything from underground coal gasification to the practical implications of biofuels. The journal is a key resource for engineers and researchers working to meet the challenges of energy engineering. Topics addressed include: development of sustainable energy policy, energy efficiency in buildings, infrastructure and transport systems, renewable energy sources, operation and decommissioning of projects, and energy conservation.
期刊最新文献
Municipal wastewater for energy generation: a favourable approach for developing nations Long-term heat storage opportunities of renewable energy for district heating networks ML based framework for optimal distributed generation management including EV loading Tidal range electricity generation into the 22nd century Wind energy potential assessment: a case study in Central India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1