时间对lps致急性肺损伤大鼠高渗盐水(NaCl 7.5%)液体复苏的影响

R. Petroni, P. Biselli, T. M. Lima, I. Velasco, F. Soriano
{"title":"时间对lps致急性肺损伤大鼠高渗盐水(NaCl 7.5%)液体复苏的影响","authors":"R. Petroni, P. Biselli, T. M. Lima, I. Velasco, F. Soriano","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000000461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common complication associated with septic shock that directly influences the prognosis of sepsis patients. Currently, one of the main supportive treatment modalities for septic shock is fluid resuscitation. The use of hypertonic saline (HS: 7.5% NaCl) for fluid resuscitation has been described as a promising therapy in experimental models of sepsis-induced ALI, but it has failed to produce similar results in clinical practice. Thus, we compared experimental timing versus clinical timing effectiveness (i.e., early vs. late fluid resuscitation) after the inflammatory scenario was established in a rat model of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI. We found that late fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline (NaCl 7.5%) did not reduce the mortality rates of animals compared with the mortality late associated with early treatment. Late fluid resuscitation with both hypertonic and normal saline increased pulmonary inflammation, decreased pulmonary function, and induced pulmonary injury by elevating metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase-9 activity and collagen deposition in the animals, unlike early treatment. The animals with lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI that received late resuscitation with any kind of fluids demonstrated aggravated pulmonary injury and respiratory function. Moreover, we showed that the therapeutic window for a beneficial effect of fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline is very narrow.","PeriodicalId":21787,"journal":{"name":"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches","volume":"1 1","pages":"609–615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Time on Fluid Resuscitation with Hypertonic Saline (NaCl 7.5%) in Rats with LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury\",\"authors\":\"R. Petroni, P. Biselli, T. M. Lima, I. Velasco, F. Soriano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000000461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common complication associated with septic shock that directly influences the prognosis of sepsis patients. Currently, one of the main supportive treatment modalities for septic shock is fluid resuscitation. The use of hypertonic saline (HS: 7.5% NaCl) for fluid resuscitation has been described as a promising therapy in experimental models of sepsis-induced ALI, but it has failed to produce similar results in clinical practice. Thus, we compared experimental timing versus clinical timing effectiveness (i.e., early vs. late fluid resuscitation) after the inflammatory scenario was established in a rat model of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI. We found that late fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline (NaCl 7.5%) did not reduce the mortality rates of animals compared with the mortality late associated with early treatment. Late fluid resuscitation with both hypertonic and normal saline increased pulmonary inflammation, decreased pulmonary function, and induced pulmonary injury by elevating metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase-9 activity and collagen deposition in the animals, unlike early treatment. The animals with lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI that received late resuscitation with any kind of fluids demonstrated aggravated pulmonary injury and respiratory function. Moreover, we showed that the therapeutic window for a beneficial effect of fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline is very narrow.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"609–615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

急性肺损伤(Acute lung injury, ALI)是脓毒性休克的常见并发症,直接影响脓毒症患者的预后。目前,脓毒性休克的主要支持治疗方式之一是液体复苏。高渗盐水(HS: 7.5% NaCl)的液体复苏在脓毒症诱导的ALI实验模型中被认为是一种很有前景的治疗方法,但在临床实践中未能产生类似的结果。因此,在细菌脂多糖诱导的ALI大鼠模型中建立炎症情景后,我们比较了实验时机和临床时机的有效性(即早期和晚期液体复苏)。我们发现,与早期治疗相关的晚期死亡率相比,晚期高渗盐水(NaCl 7.5%)液体复苏并没有降低动物死亡率。与早期治疗不同,采用高渗盐水和生理盐水进行晚期液体复苏会增加肺部炎症,降低肺功能,并通过提高动物的金属蛋白酶-2和金属蛋白酶-9活性和胶原沉积而诱导肺损伤。脂多糖诱导的ALI动物在接受任何液体的后期复苏时均表现出加重的肺损伤和呼吸功能。此外,我们表明,高渗盐水液体复苏的有益效果的治疗窗口非常狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Time on Fluid Resuscitation with Hypertonic Saline (NaCl 7.5%) in Rats with LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury
ABSTRACT Acute lung injury (ALI) is a common complication associated with septic shock that directly influences the prognosis of sepsis patients. Currently, one of the main supportive treatment modalities for septic shock is fluid resuscitation. The use of hypertonic saline (HS: 7.5% NaCl) for fluid resuscitation has been described as a promising therapy in experimental models of sepsis-induced ALI, but it has failed to produce similar results in clinical practice. Thus, we compared experimental timing versus clinical timing effectiveness (i.e., early vs. late fluid resuscitation) after the inflammatory scenario was established in a rat model of bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI. We found that late fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline (NaCl 7.5%) did not reduce the mortality rates of animals compared with the mortality late associated with early treatment. Late fluid resuscitation with both hypertonic and normal saline increased pulmonary inflammation, decreased pulmonary function, and induced pulmonary injury by elevating metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase-9 activity and collagen deposition in the animals, unlike early treatment. The animals with lipopolysaccharide-induced ALI that received late resuscitation with any kind of fluids demonstrated aggravated pulmonary injury and respiratory function. Moreover, we showed that the therapeutic window for a beneficial effect of fluid resuscitation with hypertonic saline is very narrow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metabolomic Analyses of Brain Tissue in Sepsis Induced by Cecal Ligation Reveal Specific Redox Alterations—Protective Effects of the Oxygen Radical Scavenger Edaravone Soluble Heparan Sulfate in Serum of Septic Shock Patients Induces Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Murine Cardiomyocytes Effects of the 34C>T Variant of the AMPD1 Gene on Immune Function, Multi-Organ Dysfunction, and Mortality in Sepsis Patients Evaluation of Perfusion Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Requirement in Patients with Severe Sepsis Predictors of the Onset of Hemodynamic Decompensation During Progressive Central Hypovolemia: Comparison of the Peripheral Perfusion Index, Pulse Pressure Variability, and Compensatory Reserve Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1