摘要:基于hpv的宫颈癌筛查的风险评估

R. Herrero
{"title":"摘要:基于hpv的宫颈癌筛查的风险评估","authors":"R. Herrero","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cervical cancer screening is rapidly evolving to incorporate highly accurate molecular methods that are able to categorize women9s risk of cervical cancer and allow recommendations for follow-up or treatment. HPV nucleic acid testing provides highly sensitive and reproducible detection of HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer. Thus, virtually all women who have a cervical cancer precursor or who will develop one in the following years are HPV positive. On the other hand, the vast majority of HPV positive women have transient infections that will disappear in a few months. In this context, further evaluation of HPV positive women using triage methods allows further risk stratification that avoids unnecessary evaluations and overtreatment. Women positive for the triage test are referred for immediate colposcopic evaluation and follow-up (or, in some contexts, immediate treatment) as needed, while those who test negative usually receive another screening test in a year (or more). Triage with cytology or co-testing with HPV and cytology selects a group at clearly higher risk and generally above the recommended threshold for immediate colposcopy referral based on current consensus guidelines. For HPV positive women, genotyping for HPV 16 and 18 allows further risk stratification, but the additional benefit of other HPV genotypes is unclear. Ideally, triage methods are performed on the same specimen where the HPV test was carried out, to avoid additional visits. Risk stratification is different in different populations and age groups as HPV prevalence and type distribution, as well as screening histories are highly variable around the world. The programmatic decisions need to take into account the feasibility and logistics of different approaches and their respective burden on health services. Further research, particularly in low and middle income countries and in vaccinated cohorts is required. Citation Format: Rolando Herrero. Risk-assessment in HPV-based cervical cancer screening. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr IA12.","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract IA12: Risk-assessment in HPV-based cervical cancer screening\",\"authors\":\"R. Herrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cervical cancer screening is rapidly evolving to incorporate highly accurate molecular methods that are able to categorize women9s risk of cervical cancer and allow recommendations for follow-up or treatment. HPV nucleic acid testing provides highly sensitive and reproducible detection of HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer. Thus, virtually all women who have a cervical cancer precursor or who will develop one in the following years are HPV positive. On the other hand, the vast majority of HPV positive women have transient infections that will disappear in a few months. In this context, further evaluation of HPV positive women using triage methods allows further risk stratification that avoids unnecessary evaluations and overtreatment. Women positive for the triage test are referred for immediate colposcopic evaluation and follow-up (or, in some contexts, immediate treatment) as needed, while those who test negative usually receive another screening test in a year (or more). Triage with cytology or co-testing with HPV and cytology selects a group at clearly higher risk and generally above the recommended threshold for immediate colposcopy referral based on current consensus guidelines. For HPV positive women, genotyping for HPV 16 and 18 allows further risk stratification, but the additional benefit of other HPV genotypes is unclear. Ideally, triage methods are performed on the same specimen where the HPV test was carried out, to avoid additional visits. Risk stratification is different in different populations and age groups as HPV prevalence and type distribution, as well as screening histories are highly variable around the world. The programmatic decisions need to take into account the feasibility and logistics of different approaches and their respective burden on health services. Further research, particularly in low and middle income countries and in vaccinated cohorts is required. Citation Format: Rolando Herrero. Risk-assessment in HPV-based cervical cancer screening. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr IA12.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.CARISK16-IA12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宫颈癌筛查正在迅速发展,纳入高度精确的分子方法,能够对妇女患宫颈癌的风险进行分类,并提出后续治疗建议。HPV核酸检测提供了高度敏感和可重复的HPV感染检测,HPV感染是宫颈癌的必要原因。因此,几乎所有患有宫颈癌前兆或将在随后几年发展为宫颈癌的妇女都是HPV阳性。另一方面,绝大多数HPV阳性的女性都是短暂的感染,几个月后就会消失。在这种情况下,使用分诊方法对HPV阳性妇女进行进一步评估,可以进一步进行风险分层,避免不必要的评估和过度治疗。在分诊测试中呈阳性的妇女会根据需要立即接受阴道镜检查和随访(或在某些情况下立即治疗),而那些检测结果阴性的妇女通常在一年(或更长时间)后接受另一次筛查测试。细胞学分诊或HPV和细胞学联合检测选择明显高风险的人群,根据目前的共识指南,通常高于立即阴道镜转诊的推荐阈值。对于HPV阳性妇女,HPV 16和18的基因分型允许进一步的风险分层,但其他HPV基因型的额外益处尚不清楚。理想情况下,在进行HPV检测的同一标本上进行分诊方法,以避免额外的访问。不同人群和年龄组的风险分层是不同的,因为HPV患病率和类型分布以及筛查史在世界各地都有很大差异。方案决定需要考虑到不同方法的可行性和后勤保障以及它们各自对保健服务造成的负担。需要进一步的研究,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家以及接种疫苗的人群中。引文格式:罗兰多·埃雷罗。基于人乳头状瘤病毒的子宫颈癌筛查的风险评估。[摘要]。摘自:AACR特别会议论文集:改进癌症风险预测以预防和早期发现;2016年11月16日至19日;费城(PA): AACR;Cancer epidemiology Biomarkers pre2017;26(5增刊):摘要11 - 12。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract IA12: Risk-assessment in HPV-based cervical cancer screening
Cervical cancer screening is rapidly evolving to incorporate highly accurate molecular methods that are able to categorize women9s risk of cervical cancer and allow recommendations for follow-up or treatment. HPV nucleic acid testing provides highly sensitive and reproducible detection of HPV infection, a necessary cause of cervical cancer. Thus, virtually all women who have a cervical cancer precursor or who will develop one in the following years are HPV positive. On the other hand, the vast majority of HPV positive women have transient infections that will disappear in a few months. In this context, further evaluation of HPV positive women using triage methods allows further risk stratification that avoids unnecessary evaluations and overtreatment. Women positive for the triage test are referred for immediate colposcopic evaluation and follow-up (or, in some contexts, immediate treatment) as needed, while those who test negative usually receive another screening test in a year (or more). Triage with cytology or co-testing with HPV and cytology selects a group at clearly higher risk and generally above the recommended threshold for immediate colposcopy referral based on current consensus guidelines. For HPV positive women, genotyping for HPV 16 and 18 allows further risk stratification, but the additional benefit of other HPV genotypes is unclear. Ideally, triage methods are performed on the same specimen where the HPV test was carried out, to avoid additional visits. Risk stratification is different in different populations and age groups as HPV prevalence and type distribution, as well as screening histories are highly variable around the world. The programmatic decisions need to take into account the feasibility and logistics of different approaches and their respective burden on health services. Further research, particularly in low and middle income countries and in vaccinated cohorts is required. Citation Format: Rolando Herrero. Risk-assessment in HPV-based cervical cancer screening. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr IA12.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract PO-083: A qualitative examination of race, racism, residential segregation and cancer survivorship among Black and Hispanic women Abstract PO-095: Comparative analysis of breast tumor microbiome in Black non-Hispanic (BNH) and White non-Hispanic (WNH) women Abstract A119: Ethnic and sex differences in exposure to traffic-related air pollutants and lung cancer incidence: The Multiethnic Cohort Abstract A051: Race and gender differences in awareness of colorectal cancer screening tests among recently diagnosed colon cancer Abstract B004: Capacity development among patient navigators to enhance colorectal cancer control in American Indian-serving healthcare facilities in the U.S. Southwest and Southern Plains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1