Białowieża森林世界遗产地的多时相高光谱树种分类

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forestry Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI:10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA048
A. Modzelewska, A. Kamińska, F. Fassnacht, K. Stereńczak
{"title":"Białowieża森林世界遗产地的多时相高光谱树种分类","authors":"A. Modzelewska, A. Kamińska, F. Fassnacht, K. Stereńczak","doi":"10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tree species composition maps derived from hyperspectral data have been found to be accurate but it is still \nunclear whether an optimal time window exists to acquire the images. Trees in temperate forests are subject \nto phenological changes that are species-specific and can have an impact on species recognition. Our study \nexamined the performance of a multitemporal hyperspectral dataset to classify tree species in the Polish part of \nthe Bialowie˙za Forest. We classified seven tree species including spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst), pine (Pinus \nsylvestris L.), alder (Alnus glutinosa Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.), birch (Betula pendula Roth), hornbeam \n(Carpinus betulus L.) and linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), using Support Vector Machines. We compared the results \nfor three data acquisitions—early and late summer (2–4 July and 24–27 August), and autumn (1–2 October) as \nwell as a classification based on an image stack containing all three acquisitions. Furthermore, the sizes (height \nand crown diameter) of misclassified and correctly classified trees of the same species were compared. The \nearly summer acquisition reached the highest accuracies with an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 83–94 per cent and \nKappa (κ) of 0.80–0.92. The classification based on the stacked multitemporal dataset resulted in slightly higher \naccuracies (84–94 per centOA and 0.81–0.92 κ). For some species, e.g. birch and oak, tree size differed notably for \ncorrectly and incorrectly classified trees.We conclude that implementing multitemporal hyperspectral data can \nimprove the classification result as compared with a single acquisition. However, the obtained accuracy of the \nmultitemporal image stack was in our case comparable to the best single-date classification and investing more \ntime in identifying regionally optimal acquisition windows may be worthwhile as long hyperspectral acquisitions \nare still sparse.","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multitemporal hyperspectral tree species classification in the Białowieża Forest World Heritage site\",\"authors\":\"A. Modzelewska, A. Kamińska, F. Fassnacht, K. Stereńczak\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tree species composition maps derived from hyperspectral data have been found to be accurate but it is still \\nunclear whether an optimal time window exists to acquire the images. Trees in temperate forests are subject \\nto phenological changes that are species-specific and can have an impact on species recognition. Our study \\nexamined the performance of a multitemporal hyperspectral dataset to classify tree species in the Polish part of \\nthe Bialowie˙za Forest. We classified seven tree species including spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst), pine (Pinus \\nsylvestris L.), alder (Alnus glutinosa Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.), birch (Betula pendula Roth), hornbeam \\n(Carpinus betulus L.) and linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), using Support Vector Machines. We compared the results \\nfor three data acquisitions—early and late summer (2–4 July and 24–27 August), and autumn (1–2 October) as \\nwell as a classification based on an image stack containing all three acquisitions. Furthermore, the sizes (height \\nand crown diameter) of misclassified and correctly classified trees of the same species were compared. The \\nearly summer acquisition reached the highest accuracies with an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 83–94 per cent and \\nKappa (κ) of 0.80–0.92. The classification based on the stacked multitemporal dataset resulted in slightly higher \\naccuracies (84–94 per centOA and 0.81–0.92 κ). For some species, e.g. birch and oak, tree size differed notably for \\ncorrectly and incorrectly classified trees.We conclude that implementing multitemporal hyperspectral data can \\nimprove the classification result as compared with a single acquisition. However, the obtained accuracy of the \\nmultitemporal image stack was in our case comparable to the best single-date classification and investing more \\ntime in identifying regionally optimal acquisition windows may be worthwhile as long hyperspectral acquisitions \\nare still sparse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/FORESTRY/CPAA048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

从高光谱数据得出的树种成分图是准确的,但目前尚不清楚是否存在最佳的时间窗口来获取图像。温带森林中的树木受到物种特有的物候变化的影响,并可能对物种识别产生影响。我们的研究检验了一个多时相高光谱数据集在比阿洛维˙扎森林波兰部分树种分类中的表现。对云杉(Picea abies, L.)等7种树种进行了分类。H.Karst)、松树(Pinus sylvestris L.)、桤木(Alnus glutinosa Gaertn.)、橡树(Quercus robur L.)、桦树(Betula pendula Roth)、角木(Carpinus betulus L.)和椴树(Tilia cordata Mill.)。我们比较了夏初和夏末(7月2日至4日和8月24日至27日)以及秋季(10月1日至2日)三次数据采集的结果,以及基于包含所有三次采集的图像堆栈的分类。此外,还比较了同一树种误分类和正确分类的树木的大小(高度和冠径)。初夏采集精度最高,总体精度(OA)为83 ~ 94%,Kappa (κ)为0.80 ~ 0.92。基于叠置多时相数据集的分类精度略高(84 - 94% toa和0.81-0.92 κ)。对于某些物种,例如桦树和橡树,正确和错误分类的树木的树木大小明显不同。我们得出结论,与单一采集相比,实现多时相高光谱数据可以改善分类结果。然而,在我们的案例中,获得的多时相图像堆栈的精度与最佳单日期分类相当,并且由于长高光谱采集仍然稀疏,因此投入更多时间来确定区域最佳采集窗口可能是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multitemporal hyperspectral tree species classification in the Białowieża Forest World Heritage site
Tree species composition maps derived from hyperspectral data have been found to be accurate but it is still unclear whether an optimal time window exists to acquire the images. Trees in temperate forests are subject to phenological changes that are species-specific and can have an impact on species recognition. Our study examined the performance of a multitemporal hyperspectral dataset to classify tree species in the Polish part of the Bialowie˙za Forest. We classified seven tree species including spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst), pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), alder (Alnus glutinosa Gaertn.), oak (Quercus robur L.), birch (Betula pendula Roth), hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) and linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), using Support Vector Machines. We compared the results for three data acquisitions—early and late summer (2–4 July and 24–27 August), and autumn (1–2 October) as well as a classification based on an image stack containing all three acquisitions. Furthermore, the sizes (height and crown diameter) of misclassified and correctly classified trees of the same species were compared. The early summer acquisition reached the highest accuracies with an Overall Accuracy (OA) of 83–94 per cent and Kappa (κ) of 0.80–0.92. The classification based on the stacked multitemporal dataset resulted in slightly higher accuracies (84–94 per centOA and 0.81–0.92 κ). For some species, e.g. birch and oak, tree size differed notably for correctly and incorrectly classified trees.We conclude that implementing multitemporal hyperspectral data can improve the classification result as compared with a single acquisition. However, the obtained accuracy of the multitemporal image stack was in our case comparable to the best single-date classification and investing more time in identifying regionally optimal acquisition windows may be worthwhile as long hyperspectral acquisitions are still sparse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forestry
Forestry 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge. Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.
期刊最新文献
Testing treecbh in Central European forests: an R package for crown base height detection using high-resolution aerial laser-scanned data Impact of coarse woody debris on habitat use of two sympatric rodent species in the temperate Białowieża Forest Current understanding and future prospects for ash dieback disease with a focus on Britain Comparison of population genetic structure of Pinus mugo Turra forest stands in the Giant Mountains by analysis of nSSR molecular marker data Managing harvesting residues: a systematic review of management treatments around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1