基于混合整数规划的泰国湾集群开发策略平台位置优化算法

P. Ekkawong, Parichat Loboonlert, K. Seusutthiya, K. Wongpattananukul, Nuntanut Laoniyomthai, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Tepporn Satsue, Thanawat Charucharana, Kasidis Lhosupasirirat
{"title":"基于混合整数规划的泰国湾集群开发策略平台位置优化算法","authors":"P. Ekkawong, Parichat Loboonlert, K. Seusutthiya, K. Wongpattananukul, Nuntanut Laoniyomthai, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Tepporn Satsue, Thanawat Charucharana, Kasidis Lhosupasirirat","doi":"10.2118/205765-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The unique characteristic of gas fields in the Gulf of Thailand is the compartmentalized reservoir that requires a huge number of producing wells. The task of locating platform locations for whole field perspectives that also meet all operational criteria while minimizing the number of needed platforms is challenging. This decisional task has a critical impact on project viability, especially for marginal fields. This paper proposes an innovative solution to strengthen success in this business decision by integrating subsurface domain knowledge and optimization algorithms.\n This study presents an optimization algorithm for determining the optimal locations of wellhead platforms with limited numbers to maximize hydrocarbon resources. Firstly, the algorithm performs verification matching between wellhead locations and subsurface targets throughout the field under drilling criteria. Next, the optimal platform locations are optimized using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) with the primary objective of maximizing hydrocarbon resources. The algorithm literally runs with an increment in number of platforms until there is no incremental hydrocarbon resources gain and additionally summarizes the results as the number of platforms vs. coverage resources.\n The algorithm has proven its viability by recommending more optimal platform locations in an actual field in the Gulf of Thailand. This algorithm-assisted workflow was able to reduce the number of required platforms. The main driver for this improved decision is that the MILP algorithm manage to improve well targeting and platform location selection under a large set of practical constraints. In contrast, manual workflow retains its limitations to consider them all.\n This optimization also reduces the working time required for the whole process of well targeting and platform selection. Formerly, a typical workflow takes months of equivalent man-days. Conversely, this algorithm succeeded in completing the operation within just a few hours. Further, the subsurface team saved time by eliminating some repetitive tasks, i.e., they could focus on reviewing results extracted from the optimizer. Moreover, this work demonstrated the capability to extend and scaleup to other fields with similar concepts, which ultimately could lead to more benefits.\n This innovative workflow translates the complicated subsurface procedure to a numerical optimization problem with a solid proven benefit from real field implementation. Apart from the positive business impact, this study shows that we can promote integration between modern data analytics and domain knowledge in oil and gas industry.","PeriodicalId":10970,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Algorithm-Assisted Platform Location Optmisation Using Mixed-Integer Programming for Cluster Development Strategy in the Gulf of Thailand\",\"authors\":\"P. Ekkawong, Parichat Loboonlert, K. Seusutthiya, K. Wongpattananukul, Nuntanut Laoniyomthai, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Tepporn Satsue, Thanawat Charucharana, Kasidis Lhosupasirirat\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205765-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The unique characteristic of gas fields in the Gulf of Thailand is the compartmentalized reservoir that requires a huge number of producing wells. The task of locating platform locations for whole field perspectives that also meet all operational criteria while minimizing the number of needed platforms is challenging. This decisional task has a critical impact on project viability, especially for marginal fields. This paper proposes an innovative solution to strengthen success in this business decision by integrating subsurface domain knowledge and optimization algorithms.\\n This study presents an optimization algorithm for determining the optimal locations of wellhead platforms with limited numbers to maximize hydrocarbon resources. Firstly, the algorithm performs verification matching between wellhead locations and subsurface targets throughout the field under drilling criteria. Next, the optimal platform locations are optimized using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) with the primary objective of maximizing hydrocarbon resources. The algorithm literally runs with an increment in number of platforms until there is no incremental hydrocarbon resources gain and additionally summarizes the results as the number of platforms vs. coverage resources.\\n The algorithm has proven its viability by recommending more optimal platform locations in an actual field in the Gulf of Thailand. This algorithm-assisted workflow was able to reduce the number of required platforms. The main driver for this improved decision is that the MILP algorithm manage to improve well targeting and platform location selection under a large set of practical constraints. In contrast, manual workflow retains its limitations to consider them all.\\n This optimization also reduces the working time required for the whole process of well targeting and platform selection. Formerly, a typical workflow takes months of equivalent man-days. Conversely, this algorithm succeeded in completing the operation within just a few hours. Further, the subsurface team saved time by eliminating some repetitive tasks, i.e., they could focus on reviewing results extracted from the optimizer. Moreover, this work demonstrated the capability to extend and scaleup to other fields with similar concepts, which ultimately could lead to more benefits.\\n This innovative workflow translates the complicated subsurface procedure to a numerical optimization problem with a solid proven benefit from real field implementation. Apart from the positive business impact, this study shows that we can promote integration between modern data analytics and domain knowledge in oil and gas industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205765-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, October 12, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205765-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泰国湾气田的独特特点是储层划分,需要大量的生产井。在满足所有操作标准的同时,最小化所需平台的数量,为整个油田定位平台是一项具有挑战性的任务。这一决策任务对项目的可行性具有关键影响,特别是对边缘油田。本文提出了一种结合地下领域知识和优化算法的创新解决方案,以提高商业决策的成功率。本文提出了一种确定有限数量井口平台最优位置的优化算法,以实现油气资源的最大化。首先,该算法在钻井标准下对井口位置与整个油田的地下目标进行验证匹配。接下来,利用混合整数线性规划(MILP)优化平台位置,以最大化油气资源为主要目标。该算法实际上是随着平台数量的增加而运行,直到没有增加的油气资源,并将结果总结为平台数量与覆盖资源。通过在泰国湾的实际油田中推荐更优的平台位置,证明了该算法的可行性。这种算法辅助的工作流程能够减少所需平台的数量。这种改进决策的主要驱动因素是,在大量实际约束条件下,MILP算法设法改进了井的定位和平台位置选择。相比之下,手动工作流保留了它的局限性,不能考虑所有这些问题。这种优化还减少了整个井眼定位和平台选择过程所需的工作时间。以前,一个典型的工作流需要几个月的工时。相反,该算法仅在几个小时内就成功地完成了操作。此外,地下团队通过消除一些重复的任务节省了时间,也就是说,他们可以专注于检查从优化器中提取的结果。此外,这项工作证明了扩展和扩展到具有类似概念的其他领域的能力,最终可能会带来更多的好处。这种创新的工作流程将复杂的地下过程转化为数值优化问题,并在实际现场实施中得到了坚实的证明。除了积极的商业影响外,该研究还表明,我们可以促进现代数据分析与油气行业领域知识之间的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Algorithm-Assisted Platform Location Optmisation Using Mixed-Integer Programming for Cluster Development Strategy in the Gulf of Thailand
The unique characteristic of gas fields in the Gulf of Thailand is the compartmentalized reservoir that requires a huge number of producing wells. The task of locating platform locations for whole field perspectives that also meet all operational criteria while minimizing the number of needed platforms is challenging. This decisional task has a critical impact on project viability, especially for marginal fields. This paper proposes an innovative solution to strengthen success in this business decision by integrating subsurface domain knowledge and optimization algorithms. This study presents an optimization algorithm for determining the optimal locations of wellhead platforms with limited numbers to maximize hydrocarbon resources. Firstly, the algorithm performs verification matching between wellhead locations and subsurface targets throughout the field under drilling criteria. Next, the optimal platform locations are optimized using mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) with the primary objective of maximizing hydrocarbon resources. The algorithm literally runs with an increment in number of platforms until there is no incremental hydrocarbon resources gain and additionally summarizes the results as the number of platforms vs. coverage resources. The algorithm has proven its viability by recommending more optimal platform locations in an actual field in the Gulf of Thailand. This algorithm-assisted workflow was able to reduce the number of required platforms. The main driver for this improved decision is that the MILP algorithm manage to improve well targeting and platform location selection under a large set of practical constraints. In contrast, manual workflow retains its limitations to consider them all. This optimization also reduces the working time required for the whole process of well targeting and platform selection. Formerly, a typical workflow takes months of equivalent man-days. Conversely, this algorithm succeeded in completing the operation within just a few hours. Further, the subsurface team saved time by eliminating some repetitive tasks, i.e., they could focus on reviewing results extracted from the optimizer. Moreover, this work demonstrated the capability to extend and scaleup to other fields with similar concepts, which ultimately could lead to more benefits. This innovative workflow translates the complicated subsurface procedure to a numerical optimization problem with a solid proven benefit from real field implementation. Apart from the positive business impact, this study shows that we can promote integration between modern data analytics and domain knowledge in oil and gas industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Successful Application of Managed Pressure Drilling and Cementing in Naturally Fractured Carbonates Environment of Prohorovskoe Exploration Well The Use of Induction Heating in Assessing the Technical Condition and Operating Intervals in Producing Wells A 3-Step Reaction Model For Numerical Simulation of In-Situ Combustion An Example of Building a Petrophysical Model of Unconsolidated Gas-Saturated Laminated Sediments Using Advanced Wireline and Logging While Drilling Services New method for Handling of Infrastructural Constraints for Integrated Modeling in Steady Case
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1