尤利·艾肯瓦尔德的内在批判:果戈理与陀思妥耶夫斯基的剪影

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE Studia Litterarum Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-3-242-257
Oksana A. Kravchenko, Zeinab Sadeghi Sahlabad
{"title":"尤利·艾肯瓦尔德的内在批判:果戈理与陀思妥耶夫斯基的剪影","authors":"Oksana A. Kravchenko, Zeinab Sadeghi Sahlabad","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-3-242-257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the key motifs of the essays “Gogol” and “Dostoevsky” in the collection “Silhouettes of Russian Writers” by Yu. Aikhenvald. The Author analyzes the receptive attitudes of immanent criticism, which presupposes a superhistorical existence of artistic meanings. The article proposes to extend the system of Russian literature concentres developed by Aikhenvald by a methodologically significant opposition between Pushkin’s and Gogol’s traditions. In the context of this opposition the article describes the line of continuity between Gogol and Dostoevsky, and shows that the Gogol’s comedy and Dostoyevsky’s tragedy are equally opposed to the harmony of Pushkin’s work. The authors analyses key motifs linking Gogol’s and Dostoevsky’s essays: madness, deadness, crime, night consciousness, lack of faith in man; and also reflects on allusions to Dante’s “The Divine Comedy.” The article shows that the call to overcome the influence of Dostoevsky is providentially reflected in the biography of Aikhenvald, a passenger of the “philosophical steamship” who left Russia in 1922. The author concludes that the dominant role of Gogol’s and Dostoyevsky’s line in the critic’s assessment of Russian cultural perspectives is obvious.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Immanent Critique of Yuly Aikhenvald: Silhouettes of Gogol and Dostoyevsky\",\"authors\":\"Oksana A. Kravchenko, Zeinab Sadeghi Sahlabad\",\"doi\":\"10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-3-242-257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the study of the key motifs of the essays “Gogol” and “Dostoevsky” in the collection “Silhouettes of Russian Writers” by Yu. Aikhenvald. The Author analyzes the receptive attitudes of immanent criticism, which presupposes a superhistorical existence of artistic meanings. The article proposes to extend the system of Russian literature concentres developed by Aikhenvald by a methodologically significant opposition between Pushkin’s and Gogol’s traditions. In the context of this opposition the article describes the line of continuity between Gogol and Dostoevsky, and shows that the Gogol’s comedy and Dostoyevsky’s tragedy are equally opposed to the harmony of Pushkin’s work. The authors analyses key motifs linking Gogol’s and Dostoevsky’s essays: madness, deadness, crime, night consciousness, lack of faith in man; and also reflects on allusions to Dante’s “The Divine Comedy.” The article shows that the call to overcome the influence of Dostoevsky is providentially reflected in the biography of Aikhenvald, a passenger of the “philosophical steamship” who left Russia in 1922. The author concludes that the dominant role of Gogol’s and Dostoyevsky’s line in the critic’s assessment of Russian cultural perspectives is obvious.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Litterarum\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Litterarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-3-242-257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-3-242-257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文致力于研究于的文集《俄国作家剪影》中“果戈理”和“陀思妥耶夫斯基”两篇文章的主要主题。Aikhenvald。作者分析了内在批评的接受态度,它以艺术意义的超历史存在为前提。本文建议通过普希金和果戈理传统在方法论上的显著对立,扩展艾肯瓦尔德发展起来的俄罗斯文学中心体系。在这种对立的背景下,本文描述了果戈理和陀思妥耶夫斯基之间的连续性路线,并表明果戈理的喜剧和陀思妥耶夫斯基的悲剧同样反对普希金作品的和谐。作者分析了果戈理和陀思妥耶夫斯基文章的主要主题:疯狂、死亡、犯罪、夜意识、对人缺乏信心;也反映了但丁的《神曲》的典故。这篇文章表明,克服陀思妥耶夫斯基影响的呼吁在艾肯瓦尔德的传记中得到了幸运的反映,艾肯瓦尔德是1922年离开俄罗斯的“哲学汽船”的乘客。作者的结论是,果戈理和陀思妥耶夫斯基的路线在评论家对俄罗斯文化观点的评价中起着明显的主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Immanent Critique of Yuly Aikhenvald: Silhouettes of Gogol and Dostoyevsky
The article is devoted to the study of the key motifs of the essays “Gogol” and “Dostoevsky” in the collection “Silhouettes of Russian Writers” by Yu. Aikhenvald. The Author analyzes the receptive attitudes of immanent criticism, which presupposes a superhistorical existence of artistic meanings. The article proposes to extend the system of Russian literature concentres developed by Aikhenvald by a methodologically significant opposition between Pushkin’s and Gogol’s traditions. In the context of this opposition the article describes the line of continuity between Gogol and Dostoevsky, and shows that the Gogol’s comedy and Dostoyevsky’s tragedy are equally opposed to the harmony of Pushkin’s work. The authors analyses key motifs linking Gogol’s and Dostoevsky’s essays: madness, deadness, crime, night consciousness, lack of faith in man; and also reflects on allusions to Dante’s “The Divine Comedy.” The article shows that the call to overcome the influence of Dostoevsky is providentially reflected in the biography of Aikhenvald, a passenger of the “philosophical steamship” who left Russia in 1922. The author concludes that the dominant role of Gogol’s and Dostoyevsky’s line in the critic’s assessment of Russian cultural perspectives is obvious.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specific Features of Forming French-Language Literatures of Sub-Saharan Africa as the Regional Typological Commonness Esenin’s Poem “Us”: Materials for Historical and Literary Commentary Russian Chastushka (Ditties) vs Spanish Flamenco Verses: the Experience of Typological Comparison Genre and Style Structure of Expatriate Folklore Lyrics by Crimean Tatars (“The Song of Cool Water”) “Intertextuality” in the 12th Century: Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1