应用和重新应用保存

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2021-10-12 DOI:10.5749/futuante.17.2.0045
J. H. Stubbs
{"title":"应用和重新应用保存","authors":"J. H. Stubbs","doi":"10.5749/futuante.17.2.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Architectural preservation has been a participatory activity all along. This is because of the universal and perpetual need for maintaining and repairing older structures. The commonsense of repairing, when possible, rather than replacing anew has instinctive appeal. It almost always means a savings of time, materials and money. Successful ingredients for translating preservation theory and intentions into practice involves commitment, imagination, resources, and planning and organizational skills.Over the past three decades, especially, evolving architectural preservation technologies and methods have considerably expanded our capacity to conserve the built environment. Traditional methods of building preservation such as hand drawn recordation of structures, clipboard surveys, and print photography have largely been replaced by digital documentation, geo-referenced data bases and “smarter” displays of information. A plethora of affordable new tools for scientific materials analysis and testing, both in the laboratory and in the field, are increasingly available. Radically improved data management capabilities, communications systems, plus contributions to the field from the allied professions of engineering, archaeology, museology, public history and education have significantly enhanced architectural preservation practice. Today, the preservation field’s purview and technical capabilities are robust to the point where in some places there is nearly an over-abundance of abilities to preserve the built environment. Applying these abilities remains the challenge.Renovating buildings traces back to earliest civilizations across the world. Untold tens of millions of structures have been rehabilitated in the past century alone. Many were carefully restored and respectfully rehabilitated noted historic xxiv structures. The majority, however, have been renovations and expansions of more ordinary structures. Still, such interventions involve some degree of preservation-thinking. Additionally, if one considers that maintenance is an act of building protection, then architectural preservation must represent well over half of the world’s residential and commercial building industry.In time, naturally, most all prior restoration and rehabilitation interventions themselves need re-doing. As a result, today’s preservationists are increasingly involved with “re-restoring” buildings and, in relation to that, “re-researching” and “reinterpreting” them as well. Such operations could be termed reapplied preservation.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"35 1","pages":"44 - 59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applied and Reapplied Preservation\",\"authors\":\"J. H. Stubbs\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/futuante.17.2.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Architectural preservation has been a participatory activity all along. This is because of the universal and perpetual need for maintaining and repairing older structures. The commonsense of repairing, when possible, rather than replacing anew has instinctive appeal. It almost always means a savings of time, materials and money. Successful ingredients for translating preservation theory and intentions into practice involves commitment, imagination, resources, and planning and organizational skills.Over the past three decades, especially, evolving architectural preservation technologies and methods have considerably expanded our capacity to conserve the built environment. Traditional methods of building preservation such as hand drawn recordation of structures, clipboard surveys, and print photography have largely been replaced by digital documentation, geo-referenced data bases and “smarter” displays of information. A plethora of affordable new tools for scientific materials analysis and testing, both in the laboratory and in the field, are increasingly available. Radically improved data management capabilities, communications systems, plus contributions to the field from the allied professions of engineering, archaeology, museology, public history and education have significantly enhanced architectural preservation practice. Today, the preservation field’s purview and technical capabilities are robust to the point where in some places there is nearly an over-abundance of abilities to preserve the built environment. Applying these abilities remains the challenge.Renovating buildings traces back to earliest civilizations across the world. Untold tens of millions of structures have been rehabilitated in the past century alone. Many were carefully restored and respectfully rehabilitated noted historic xxiv structures. The majority, however, have been renovations and expansions of more ordinary structures. Still, such interventions involve some degree of preservation-thinking. Additionally, if one considers that maintenance is an act of building protection, then architectural preservation must represent well over half of the world’s residential and commercial building industry.In time, naturally, most all prior restoration and rehabilitation interventions themselves need re-doing. As a result, today’s preservationists are increasingly involved with “re-restoring” buildings and, in relation to that, “re-researching” and “reinterpreting” them as well. Such operations could be termed reapplied preservation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Anterior\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Anterior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.2.0045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.17.2.0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:建筑保护一直是一项参与性活动。这是因为普遍和永久需要维护和修理旧结构。在可能的情况下维修而不是更换的常识具有本能的吸引力。它几乎总是意味着节省时间、材料和金钱。将保护理论和意图转化为实践的成功要素包括承诺、想象力、资源、计划和组织技能。特别是在过去的三十年里,不断发展的建筑保护技术和方法大大扩大了我们保护建筑环境的能力。传统的建筑保存方法,如手绘结构记录、剪贴板调查和印刷摄影,已经在很大程度上被数字文档、地理参考数据库和“更智能”的信息显示所取代。越来越多的负担得起的新工具可用于科学材料的分析和测试,无论是在实验室还是在现场。从根本上改进的数据管理能力、通信系统,加上工程、考古学、博物馆学、公共历史和教育等相关专业对该领域的贡献,大大增强了建筑保护实践。今天,保护领域的范围和技术能力是强大的,在一些地方,保护建筑环境的能力几乎是过剩的。运用这些能力仍然是一个挑战。修缮建筑可以追溯到世界上最早的文明。仅在过去的一个世纪里,就修复了数以千万计的建筑物。许多著名的历史建筑得到了精心修复和尊重。然而,大多数都是对更普通的建筑进行翻新和扩建。不过,这样的干预涉及到某种程度的保护思想。此外,如果人们认为维护是一种建筑保护行为,那么建筑保护必须代表世界上一半以上的住宅和商业建筑行业。自然,随着时间的推移,大多数先前的修复和康复干预本身都需要重新做。因此,今天的保护主义者越来越多地参与“重建”建筑,并与之相关,“重新研究”和“重新解释”它们。这种操作可称为再应用保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applied and Reapplied Preservation
Abstract:Architectural preservation has been a participatory activity all along. This is because of the universal and perpetual need for maintaining and repairing older structures. The commonsense of repairing, when possible, rather than replacing anew has instinctive appeal. It almost always means a savings of time, materials and money. Successful ingredients for translating preservation theory and intentions into practice involves commitment, imagination, resources, and planning and organizational skills.Over the past three decades, especially, evolving architectural preservation technologies and methods have considerably expanded our capacity to conserve the built environment. Traditional methods of building preservation such as hand drawn recordation of structures, clipboard surveys, and print photography have largely been replaced by digital documentation, geo-referenced data bases and “smarter” displays of information. A plethora of affordable new tools for scientific materials analysis and testing, both in the laboratory and in the field, are increasingly available. Radically improved data management capabilities, communications systems, plus contributions to the field from the allied professions of engineering, archaeology, museology, public history and education have significantly enhanced architectural preservation practice. Today, the preservation field’s purview and technical capabilities are robust to the point where in some places there is nearly an over-abundance of abilities to preserve the built environment. Applying these abilities remains the challenge.Renovating buildings traces back to earliest civilizations across the world. Untold tens of millions of structures have been rehabilitated in the past century alone. Many were carefully restored and respectfully rehabilitated noted historic xxiv structures. The majority, however, have been renovations and expansions of more ordinary structures. Still, such interventions involve some degree of preservation-thinking. Additionally, if one considers that maintenance is an act of building protection, then architectural preservation must represent well over half of the world’s residential and commercial building industry.In time, naturally, most all prior restoration and rehabilitation interventions themselves need re-doing. As a result, today’s preservationists are increasingly involved with “re-restoring” buildings and, in relation to that, “re-researching” and “reinterpreting” them as well. Such operations could be termed reapplied preservation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1