一种新的乳腺癌组织分类方法——深杂交异质集合

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Technologies and Applications Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1108/dta-05-2022-0210
Hasnae Zerouaoui, A. Idri, Omar El Alaoui
{"title":"一种新的乳腺癌组织分类方法——深杂交异质集合","authors":"Hasnae Zerouaoui, A. Idri, Omar El Alaoui","doi":"10.1108/dta-05-2022-0210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeHundreds of thousands of deaths each year in the world are caused by breast cancer (BC). An early-stage diagnosis of this disease can positively reduce the morbidity and mortality rate by helping to select the most appropriate treatment options, especially by using histological BC images for the diagnosis.Design/methodology/approachThe present study proposes and evaluates a novel approach which consists of 24 deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles that combine the strength of seven deep learning techniques (DenseNet 201, Inception V3, VGG16, VGG19, Inception-ResNet-V3, MobileNet V2 and ResNet 50) for feature extraction and four well-known classifiers (multi-layer perceptron, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors and decision tree) by means of hard and weighted voting combination methods for histological classification of BC medical image. Furthermore, the best deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles were compared to the deep stacked ensembles to determine the best strategy to design the deep ensemble methods. The empirical evaluations used four classification performance criteria (accuracy, sensitivity, precision and F1-score), fivefold cross-validation, Scott–Knott (SK) statistical test and Borda count voting method. All empirical evaluations were assessed using four performance measures, including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score, and were over the histological BreakHis public dataset with four magnification factors (40×, 100×, 200× and 400×). SK statistical test and Borda count were also used to cluster the designed techniques and rank the techniques belonging to the best SK cluster, respectively.FindingsResults showed that the deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles outperformed both their singles and the deep stacked ensembles and reached the accuracy values of 96.3, 95.6, 96.3 and 94 per cent across the four magnification factors 40×, 100×, 200× and 400×, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles can be applied for the BC diagnosis to assist pathologists in reducing the missed diagnoses and proposing adequate treatments for the patients.","PeriodicalId":56156,"journal":{"name":"Data Technologies and Applications","volume":"38 1","pages":"245-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach for histological classification of breast cancer using deep hybrid heterogenous ensemble\",\"authors\":\"Hasnae Zerouaoui, A. Idri, Omar El Alaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dta-05-2022-0210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeHundreds of thousands of deaths each year in the world are caused by breast cancer (BC). An early-stage diagnosis of this disease can positively reduce the morbidity and mortality rate by helping to select the most appropriate treatment options, especially by using histological BC images for the diagnosis.Design/methodology/approachThe present study proposes and evaluates a novel approach which consists of 24 deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles that combine the strength of seven deep learning techniques (DenseNet 201, Inception V3, VGG16, VGG19, Inception-ResNet-V3, MobileNet V2 and ResNet 50) for feature extraction and four well-known classifiers (multi-layer perceptron, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors and decision tree) by means of hard and weighted voting combination methods for histological classification of BC medical image. Furthermore, the best deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles were compared to the deep stacked ensembles to determine the best strategy to design the deep ensemble methods. The empirical evaluations used four classification performance criteria (accuracy, sensitivity, precision and F1-score), fivefold cross-validation, Scott–Knott (SK) statistical test and Borda count voting method. All empirical evaluations were assessed using four performance measures, including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score, and were over the histological BreakHis public dataset with four magnification factors (40×, 100×, 200× and 400×). SK statistical test and Borda count were also used to cluster the designed techniques and rank the techniques belonging to the best SK cluster, respectively.FindingsResults showed that the deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles outperformed both their singles and the deep stacked ensembles and reached the accuracy values of 96.3, 95.6, 96.3 and 94 per cent across the four magnification factors 40×, 100×, 200× and 400×, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles can be applied for the BC diagnosis to assist pathologists in reducing the missed diagnoses and proposing adequate treatments for the patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"245-278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data Technologies and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-05-2022-0210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Technologies and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dta-05-2022-0210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的全世界每年有数十万人死于乳腺癌(BC)。早期诊断可以通过帮助选择最合适的治疗方案,特别是通过使用组织学BC图像进行诊断,积极降低发病率和死亡率。本研究提出并评估了一种新方法,该方法由24个深度混合异构集成组成,结合了7种深度学习技术(DenseNet 201、Inception V3、VGG16、VGG19、Inception-ResNet V3、MobileNet V2和ResNet 50)的强度,用于特征提取和4种知名分类器(多层感知器、支持向量机、采用硬投票和加权投票相结合的方法对BC医学图像进行组织学分类。并将最佳的深层混合异质集成与深层堆叠集成进行了比较,以确定深层集成方法的最佳设计策略。实证评价采用4个分类性能标准(准确性、灵敏度、精密度和f1评分)、五重交叉验证、Scott-Knott (SK)统计检验和Borda计数投票法。所有实证评价均采用准确率、精密度、召回率和f1评分四项绩效指标进行评估,并在组织学BreakHis公共数据集上采用四种放大因子(40倍、100倍、200倍和400倍)进行评估。采用SK统计检验和Borda计数对设计的技术进行聚类,并对属于最佳SK聚类的技术进行排序。结果表明,在40倍、100倍、200倍和400倍的放大倍数下,深层混合异质集成的精度分别达到96.3%、95.6%、96.3%和94%,优于单一集成和深层堆叠集成。独创性/价值所提出的深度混合异质性集成可用于BC诊断,以帮助病理学家减少漏诊并为患者提出适当的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach for histological classification of breast cancer using deep hybrid heterogenous ensemble
PurposeHundreds of thousands of deaths each year in the world are caused by breast cancer (BC). An early-stage diagnosis of this disease can positively reduce the morbidity and mortality rate by helping to select the most appropriate treatment options, especially by using histological BC images for the diagnosis.Design/methodology/approachThe present study proposes and evaluates a novel approach which consists of 24 deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles that combine the strength of seven deep learning techniques (DenseNet 201, Inception V3, VGG16, VGG19, Inception-ResNet-V3, MobileNet V2 and ResNet 50) for feature extraction and four well-known classifiers (multi-layer perceptron, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbors and decision tree) by means of hard and weighted voting combination methods for histological classification of BC medical image. Furthermore, the best deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles were compared to the deep stacked ensembles to determine the best strategy to design the deep ensemble methods. The empirical evaluations used four classification performance criteria (accuracy, sensitivity, precision and F1-score), fivefold cross-validation, Scott–Knott (SK) statistical test and Borda count voting method. All empirical evaluations were assessed using four performance measures, including accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score, and were over the histological BreakHis public dataset with four magnification factors (40×, 100×, 200× and 400×). SK statistical test and Borda count were also used to cluster the designed techniques and rank the techniques belonging to the best SK cluster, respectively.FindingsResults showed that the deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles outperformed both their singles and the deep stacked ensembles and reached the accuracy values of 96.3, 95.6, 96.3 and 94 per cent across the four magnification factors 40×, 100×, 200× and 400×, respectively.Originality/valueThe proposed deep hybrid heterogenous ensembles can be applied for the BC diagnosis to assist pathologists in reducing the missed diagnoses and proposing adequate treatments for the patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data Technologies and Applications
Data Technologies and Applications Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Previously published as: Program Online from: 2018 Subject Area: Information & Knowledge Management, Library Studies
期刊最新文献
Understanding customer behavior by mapping complaints to personality based on social media textual data A systematic review of the use of FHIR to support clinical research, public health and medical education Novel framework for learning performance prediction using pattern identification and deep learning A comparative analysis of job satisfaction prediction models using machine learning: a mixed-method approach Assessing the alignment of corporate ESG disclosures with the UN sustainable development goals: a BERT-based text analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1