基于羟基和硫酸盐自由基的降解工艺对氨基脲毒性去除的评价

Cátia A. L. Graça, M. Maniero, L. M. de Andrade, José Roberto Guimarães, A. C. Teixeira
{"title":"基于羟基和硫酸盐自由基的降解工艺对氨基脲毒性去除的评价","authors":"Cátia A. L. Graça, M. Maniero, L. M. de Andrade, José Roberto Guimarães, A. C. Teixeira","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1643693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The herbicide amicarbazone (AMZ), which appeared as a possible alternative to atrazine, presents moderate environmental persistence and is unlikely to be removed by conventional water treatment techniques. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) driven by •OH and/or SO4•− radicals are then promising alternatives to AMZ-contaminated waters remediation, even though, in some cases, they can originate more toxic degradation products than the parent-compound. Therefore, assessing treated solutions toxicity prior to disposal is of extreme importance. In this study, the toxicity of AMZ solutions, before and after treatment with different •OH-driven and SO4•−-driven AOPs, was evaluated for five different microorganisms: Vibrio fischeri, Chlorella vulgaris, Tetrahymena thermophila, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis. In general, the toxic response of AMZ was greatly affected by the addition of reactants, especially when persulfate (PS) and/or Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes were added. The modifications of this response after treatment were correlated with AMZ intermediates, which were identified by mass spectrometry. Thus, low molecular weight by-products, resulting from fast degradation kinetics, were associated with increased toxicity to bacteria and trophic effects to microalgae. These observations were compared with toxicological predictions given by a Structure-Activity Relationships software, which revealed to be fairly compatible with our empirical findings.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"55 1","pages":"1126 - 1143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of amicarbazone toxicity removal through degradation processes based on hydroxyl and sulfate radicals\",\"authors\":\"Cátia A. L. Graça, M. Maniero, L. M. de Andrade, José Roberto Guimarães, A. C. Teixeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10934529.2019.1643693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The herbicide amicarbazone (AMZ), which appeared as a possible alternative to atrazine, presents moderate environmental persistence and is unlikely to be removed by conventional water treatment techniques. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) driven by •OH and/or SO4•− radicals are then promising alternatives to AMZ-contaminated waters remediation, even though, in some cases, they can originate more toxic degradation products than the parent-compound. Therefore, assessing treated solutions toxicity prior to disposal is of extreme importance. In this study, the toxicity of AMZ solutions, before and after treatment with different •OH-driven and SO4•−-driven AOPs, was evaluated for five different microorganisms: Vibrio fischeri, Chlorella vulgaris, Tetrahymena thermophila, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis. In general, the toxic response of AMZ was greatly affected by the addition of reactants, especially when persulfate (PS) and/or Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes were added. The modifications of this response after treatment were correlated with AMZ intermediates, which were identified by mass spectrometry. Thus, low molecular weight by-products, resulting from fast degradation kinetics, were associated with increased toxicity to bacteria and trophic effects to microalgae. These observations were compared with toxicological predictions given by a Structure-Activity Relationships software, which revealed to be fairly compatible with our empirical findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1126 - 1143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1643693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1643693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

除草剂氨基脲(AMZ)被认为是阿特拉津的可能替代品,具有中等的环境持久性,不太可能被传统的水处理技术去除。因此,由•OH和/或SO4•−自由基驱动的高级氧化过程(AOPs)是amz污染水体修复的有希望的替代品,尽管在某些情况下,它们可能产生比母体化合物更有毒的降解产物。因此,在处置前评估处理过的溶液的毒性是极其重要的。在本研究中,我们评估了AMZ溶液在不同的•oh驱动和SO4•−驱动AOPs处理前后对5种不同微生物的毒性:费氏弧菌、寻常小球藻、嗜热四膜虫、大肠杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌。总的来说,AMZ的毒性反应受反应物添加量的影响很大,特别是当添加过硫酸盐(PS)和/或铁(III)-羧酸配合物时。治疗后这种反应的改变与AMZ中间体相关,并通过质谱法鉴定。因此,由快速降解动力学产生的低分子量副产物与增加的细菌毒性和对微藻的营养效应有关。这些观察结果与结构-活性关系软件给出的毒理学预测进行了比较,结果显示与我们的经验发现相当一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of amicarbazone toxicity removal through degradation processes based on hydroxyl and sulfate radicals
Abstract The herbicide amicarbazone (AMZ), which appeared as a possible alternative to atrazine, presents moderate environmental persistence and is unlikely to be removed by conventional water treatment techniques. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) driven by •OH and/or SO4•− radicals are then promising alternatives to AMZ-contaminated waters remediation, even though, in some cases, they can originate more toxic degradation products than the parent-compound. Therefore, assessing treated solutions toxicity prior to disposal is of extreme importance. In this study, the toxicity of AMZ solutions, before and after treatment with different •OH-driven and SO4•−-driven AOPs, was evaluated for five different microorganisms: Vibrio fischeri, Chlorella vulgaris, Tetrahymena thermophila, Escherichia coli, and Bacillus subtilis. In general, the toxic response of AMZ was greatly affected by the addition of reactants, especially when persulfate (PS) and/or Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes were added. The modifications of this response after treatment were correlated with AMZ intermediates, which were identified by mass spectrometry. Thus, low molecular weight by-products, resulting from fast degradation kinetics, were associated with increased toxicity to bacteria and trophic effects to microalgae. These observations were compared with toxicological predictions given by a Structure-Activity Relationships software, which revealed to be fairly compatible with our empirical findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adsorption kinetics, isotherms, and selectivity of trihalomethanes and haloacetonitriles by granular activated carbon. Immobilization of HRP enzyme on polymeric microspheres and its use in decolourisation of organic dyes. Integration of down-flow hanging sponge reactor to oreochromis niloticus - Brassica oleracea aquaponics system. Photocatalytic degradation process of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole by ZnO in aquatic systems: a dynamic kinetic model based on contributions of OH radical, oxygenated radical intermediates and dissolved oxygen A novel and efficient voltammetric sensor for the simultaneous determination of alizarin red S and tartrazine by using poly(leucine) functionalized carbon paste electrode
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1