你知道r2吗?

IF 3.4 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL ADMET and DMPK Pub Date : 2020-08-30 DOI:10.5599/admet.888
A. Avdeef
{"title":"你知道r2吗?","authors":"A. Avdeef","doi":"10.5599/admet.888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.","PeriodicalId":7259,"journal":{"name":"ADMET and DMPK","volume":"1 1","pages":"69 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do you know your r2?\",\"authors\":\"A. Avdeef\",\"doi\":\"10.5599/admet.888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ADMET and DMPK\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ADMET and DMPK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADMET and DMPK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

药物溶解度的预测通常需要在各种计算步骤中使用几个开源/商业可用的计算机程序。表明预测模型强度的常用统计数据包括决定系数(r2)、Pearson线性相关系数(rPearson)和均方根误差(RMSE)等。当程序计算这些统计信息时,可能会使用稍微不同的定义。本文简要回顾了三种类型的r2和RMSE统计(模型验证、偏差补偿和Pearson)的定义,以及由于溶解度预测模型的缺陷而导致的系统误差如何通过统计指标的选择来不同地表示。我们在最近发表的预测类药物分子溶解度的论文中使用的指标并不明确,特别是在“超过5法则”化学空间的药物的情况下,因为简单的预测模型显示出明显的“偏倚-倾斜”系统类型分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do you know your r2?
The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ADMET and DMPK
ADMET and DMPK Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: ADMET and DMPK is an open access journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of new and original scientific results in all areas of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of drugs. ADMET and DMPK publishes the following types of contributions: - Original research papers - Feature articles - Review articles - Short communications and Notes - Letters to Editors - Book reviews The scope of the Journal involves, but is not limited to, the following areas: - physico-chemical properties of drugs and methods of their determination - drug permeabilities - drug absorption - drug-drug, drug-protein, drug-membrane and drug-DNA interactions - chemical stability and degradations of drugs - instrumental methods in ADMET - drug metablic processes - routes of administration and excretion of drug - pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study - quantitative structure activity/property relationship - ADME/PK modelling - Toxicology screening - Transporter identification and study
期刊最新文献
Predicting the acute aquatic toxicity of organic UV filters used in cosmetic formulations. Determination of methotrexate using carbon paste electrode modified with ionic liquid/Ni-Co layered double hydroxide nanosheets as a voltammetric sensor. Food and bile micelle binding of zwitterionic antihistamine drugs. Molecular properties, including chameleonicity, as essential tools for designing the next generation of oral beyond rule of five drugs. Cerium oxide nanoparticles-assisted aptasensor for chronic myeloid leukaemia detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1