{"title":"你知道r2吗?","authors":"A. Avdeef","doi":"10.5599/admet.888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.","PeriodicalId":7259,"journal":{"name":"ADMET and DMPK","volume":"1 1","pages":"69 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do you know your r2?\",\"authors\":\"A. Avdeef\",\"doi\":\"10.5599/admet.888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ADMET and DMPK\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ADMET and DMPK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADMET and DMPK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prediction of solubility of drugs usually calls on the use of several open-source/commercially-available computer programs in the various calculation steps. Popular statistics to indicate the strength of the prediction model include the coefficient of determination (r2), Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient (rPearson), and the root-mean-square error (RMSE), among many others. When a program calculates these statistics, slightly different definitions may be used. This commentary briefly reviews the definitions of three types of r2 and RMSE statistics (model validation, bias compensation, and Pearson) and how systematic errors due to shortcomings in solubility prediction models can be differently indicated by the choice of statistical indices. The indices we have employed in recently published papers on the prediction of solubility of druglike molecules were unclear, especially in cases of drugs from ‘beyond the Rule of 5’ chemical space, as simple prediction models showed distinctive ‘bias-tilt’ systematic type scatter.
期刊介绍:
ADMET and DMPK is an open access journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of new and original scientific results in all areas of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of drugs. ADMET and DMPK publishes the following types of contributions: - Original research papers - Feature articles - Review articles - Short communications and Notes - Letters to Editors - Book reviews The scope of the Journal involves, but is not limited to, the following areas: - physico-chemical properties of drugs and methods of their determination - drug permeabilities - drug absorption - drug-drug, drug-protein, drug-membrane and drug-DNA interactions - chemical stability and degradations of drugs - instrumental methods in ADMET - drug metablic processes - routes of administration and excretion of drug - pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study - quantitative structure activity/property relationship - ADME/PK modelling - Toxicology screening - Transporter identification and study