通过社会正义的视角审视职业转型叙事:对英国新闻界的批判性研究

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED British Journal of Guidance & Counselling Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/03069885.2022.2077305
Ghazal Vahidi, J. Arnold, S. Barnard
{"title":"通过社会正义的视角审视职业转型叙事:对英国新闻界的批判性研究","authors":"Ghazal Vahidi, J. Arnold, S. Barnard","doi":"10.1080/03069885.2022.2077305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article we examine the print media portrayal of career transitions by adapting Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework. The aim is to explore and critically analyse the newspaper articles published in The Times, Guardian, and Daily Mail between 1985 and 2015, the same time span in which career development theories started to get public attention. In particular, we answer the question of how the language used by journalists influences assumptions about personal agency in career development. Assessing the similarities and differences of the dominant academic discourses and the social characteristic of the press provides a setting to draw conclusions about the social implications of career theories.","PeriodicalId":9352,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Guidance & Counselling","volume":"31 1","pages":"617 - 630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining career transition narratives through the lens of social justice: a critical study of the British Press\",\"authors\":\"Ghazal Vahidi, J. Arnold, S. Barnard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03069885.2022.2077305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article we examine the print media portrayal of career transitions by adapting Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework. The aim is to explore and critically analyse the newspaper articles published in The Times, Guardian, and Daily Mail between 1985 and 2015, the same time span in which career development theories started to get public attention. In particular, we answer the question of how the language used by journalists influences assumptions about personal agency in career development. Assessing the similarities and differences of the dominant academic discourses and the social characteristic of the press provides a setting to draw conclusions about the social implications of career theories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Guidance & Counselling\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"617 - 630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Guidance & Counselling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2077305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Guidance & Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2077305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们通过采用费尔克劳的批评话语分析(CDA)框架来研究平面媒体对职业转型的描述。目的是探索和批判性地分析1985年至2015年间发表在《泰晤士报》、《卫报》和《每日邮报》上的报纸文章,与此同时,职业发展理论开始受到公众的关注。特别是,我们回答了记者使用的语言如何影响职业发展中个人代理的假设的问题。评估主流学术话语和新闻社会特征的异同,为得出职业理论的社会含义的结论提供了一个背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining career transition narratives through the lens of social justice: a critical study of the British Press
ABSTRACT In this article we examine the print media portrayal of career transitions by adapting Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework. The aim is to explore and critically analyse the newspaper articles published in The Times, Guardian, and Daily Mail between 1985 and 2015, the same time span in which career development theories started to get public attention. In particular, we answer the question of how the language used by journalists influences assumptions about personal agency in career development. Assessing the similarities and differences of the dominant academic discourses and the social characteristic of the press provides a setting to draw conclusions about the social implications of career theories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Guidance & Counselling exists to communicate theoretical and practical writing of high quality in the guidance and counselling field. It is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations from practitioners and researchers from around the world. It is concerned to promote the following areas: •the theory and practice of guidance and counselling •the provision of guidance and counselling services •training and professional issues
期刊最新文献
Gender moderates the relationships between childhood abuse experiences and mental disorders later in life: a cross-sectional study among university students in Turkey Do insight and altruism lead to flourishing through providing self-compassion in mental health professional candidates? Measuring the ABC of life skills: life skills scale revision and standardisation for adult population Telesupervision in counselling and psychotherapy: a systematic review of the literature A phenomenological analysis of the role and well-being challenges experienced by professional International School Counsellors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1