{"title":"活体肝移植受者肝移植物潮红及其与血流动力学状态的关系:埃及的经验","authors":"Amr M Hilal Abdou, F. Malak","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There have been limited data towards the hemodynamic (HD) changes in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) especially during the reperfusion phase. Purpose: Does surgical techniques affects the HD of the patients during reperfusion? We evaluated the differences between two surgical techniques done before the reperfusion phase of LDLT; one with liver graft flush and the other without flush. Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Center of organ transplantation. Analysis of 50 recipients HD data, usage of vassopressors, ICU stay and mortality during reperfusion phase and 20 min after it, thus comparing two different methods; one with liver flush through the portal vein (PV) of 100 ml-200 ml (1.5 ml/kg-2.5 ml/kg) of blood and venting it from hepatic vein (HV), other group without liver flush technique. Results: Regarding the use of vassopressors; recipients underwent liver flush showed low initial and maintenance doses of nor-epinephrine compared to patients without flush (P ≤ 0.001), no differences detected regarding the HD state, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and blood products usage between the two techniques. Conclusion: In patients candidates for LDLT there is an increased risk of a complex and not completely understood pathology of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), antegrade Portal vein (PV) flushing with HV venting is a surgical technique with reduced doses of vassopressors with minimal PRS hemodynamic instability.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liver Grafts Flush and its Relation to Hemodynamic Status in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Egyptian Experience\",\"authors\":\"Amr M Hilal Abdou, F. Malak\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6148.1000831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There have been limited data towards the hemodynamic (HD) changes in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) especially during the reperfusion phase. Purpose: Does surgical techniques affects the HD of the patients during reperfusion? We evaluated the differences between two surgical techniques done before the reperfusion phase of LDLT; one with liver graft flush and the other without flush. Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Center of organ transplantation. Analysis of 50 recipients HD data, usage of vassopressors, ICU stay and mortality during reperfusion phase and 20 min after it, thus comparing two different methods; one with liver flush through the portal vein (PV) of 100 ml-200 ml (1.5 ml/kg-2.5 ml/kg) of blood and venting it from hepatic vein (HV), other group without liver flush technique. Results: Regarding the use of vassopressors; recipients underwent liver flush showed low initial and maintenance doses of nor-epinephrine compared to patients without flush (P ≤ 0.001), no differences detected regarding the HD state, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and blood products usage between the two techniques. Conclusion: In patients candidates for LDLT there is an increased risk of a complex and not completely understood pathology of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), antegrade Portal vein (PV) flushing with HV venting is a surgical technique with reduced doses of vassopressors with minimal PRS hemodynamic instability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:关于活体肝移植(LDLT)受者血流动力学(HD)变化的数据有限,特别是在再灌注阶段。目的:手术技术是否会影响再灌注患者的HD ?我们评估了在LDLT再灌注阶段之前进行的两种手术技术之间的差异;一个移植了肝,另一个没有。方法:在艾因沙姆斯大学附属医院器官移植中心进行回顾性观察性研究。分析50例受体HD资料、再灌注期及再灌注后20 min的降压药物使用情况、ICU住院时间及死亡率,比较两种方法的差异;一组通过门静脉(PV)冲洗100 ml-200 ml (1.5 ml/kg-2.5 ml/kg)血液并从肝静脉(HV)排出,另一组不采用肝脏冲洗技术。结果:在降压药的使用方面;与不冲洗肝脏的患者相比,接受肝脏冲洗的患者初始和维持去甲肾上腺素剂量较低(P≤0.001),两种技术在HD状态、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和血液制品使用方面没有发现差异。结论:在候选LDLT患者中,存在复杂且尚未完全理解的灌注后综合征(PRS)病理的风险增加,顺行门静脉(PV)冲洗与HV通气是一种外科技术,减少了加压药物的剂量,最小化了PRS血流动力学不稳定性。
Liver Grafts Flush and its Relation to Hemodynamic Status in Recipients of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Egyptian Experience
Background: There have been limited data towards the hemodynamic (HD) changes in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) especially during the reperfusion phase. Purpose: Does surgical techniques affects the HD of the patients during reperfusion? We evaluated the differences between two surgical techniques done before the reperfusion phase of LDLT; one with liver graft flush and the other without flush. Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Center of organ transplantation. Analysis of 50 recipients HD data, usage of vassopressors, ICU stay and mortality during reperfusion phase and 20 min after it, thus comparing two different methods; one with liver flush through the portal vein (PV) of 100 ml-200 ml (1.5 ml/kg-2.5 ml/kg) of blood and venting it from hepatic vein (HV), other group without liver flush technique. Results: Regarding the use of vassopressors; recipients underwent liver flush showed low initial and maintenance doses of nor-epinephrine compared to patients without flush (P ≤ 0.001), no differences detected regarding the HD state, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and blood products usage between the two techniques. Conclusion: In patients candidates for LDLT there is an increased risk of a complex and not completely understood pathology of postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), antegrade Portal vein (PV) flushing with HV venting is a surgical technique with reduced doses of vassopressors with minimal PRS hemodynamic instability.