前后步行对多发性硬化症患者下肢力量、平衡和步态的影响:一项随机可行性试验。

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-010
Heather M DelMastro, Jennifer A Ruiz, Laura B Simaitis, Elizabeth S Gromisch, Lindsay O Neto, Evan T Cohen, Edgar Wong, Robert J Krug, Albert C Lo
{"title":"前后步行对多发性硬化症患者下肢力量、平衡和步态的影响:一项随机可行性试验。","authors":"Heather M DelMastro,&nbsp;Jennifer A Ruiz,&nbsp;Laura B Simaitis,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Gromisch,&nbsp;Lindsay O Neto,&nbsp;Evan T Cohen,&nbsp;Edgar Wong,&nbsp;Robert J Krug,&nbsp;Albert C Lo","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Backward walking (BW) interventions have improved gait and balance in persons with stroke, cerebral palsy, and Parkinson disease but have not been studied in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We examined the feasibility of a BW intervention and how it affected strength, balance, and gait vs forward walking (FW) in persons with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen persons with MS with a Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale score of 3 to 5 (gait impairment-late cane) were randomized to the FW (n = 8) or BW (n = 8) group. Participants did 30 minutes of FW or BW on a treadmill 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 visits). Enrollment, adherence rate, and safety were tracked. The Timed Up and Go test, Six-Spot Step Test, single-leg stance, and abbreviated Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale were used to measure balance. Hip and knee flexion and extension strength (isometric peak torque), gait speed, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured. A 2×2 factorial multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine changes in strength, balance, and gait, with the PDDS scale score as the covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment adherence rate was 99.7%, with no safety concerns. After controlling for baseline differences in disability (PDDS scale score; <i>P</i> = .041), the BW group improved dominant hip flexion strength preintervention to postintervention compared with the FW group (<i>F</i> <sub>1,13</sub> = 9.03; <i>P</i> = .010). No other significant differences were seen between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first study to look at BW as an intervention in persons with MS. Based on its feasibility, safety, and significant finding, BW should be studied in a larger, definitive trial in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"25 2","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010109/pdf/i1537-2073-25-2-45.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Backward and Forward Walking on Lower Limb Strength, Balance, and Gait in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Heather M DelMastro,&nbsp;Jennifer A Ruiz,&nbsp;Laura B Simaitis,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Gromisch,&nbsp;Lindsay O Neto,&nbsp;Evan T Cohen,&nbsp;Edgar Wong,&nbsp;Robert J Krug,&nbsp;Albert C Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Backward walking (BW) interventions have improved gait and balance in persons with stroke, cerebral palsy, and Parkinson disease but have not been studied in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We examined the feasibility of a BW intervention and how it affected strength, balance, and gait vs forward walking (FW) in persons with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen persons with MS with a Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale score of 3 to 5 (gait impairment-late cane) were randomized to the FW (n = 8) or BW (n = 8) group. Participants did 30 minutes of FW or BW on a treadmill 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 visits). Enrollment, adherence rate, and safety were tracked. The Timed Up and Go test, Six-Spot Step Test, single-leg stance, and abbreviated Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale were used to measure balance. Hip and knee flexion and extension strength (isometric peak torque), gait speed, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured. A 2×2 factorial multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine changes in strength, balance, and gait, with the PDDS scale score as the covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment adherence rate was 99.7%, with no safety concerns. After controlling for baseline differences in disability (PDDS scale score; <i>P</i> = .041), the BW group improved dominant hip flexion strength preintervention to postintervention compared with the FW group (<i>F</i> <sub>1,13</sub> = 9.03; <i>P</i> = .010). No other significant differences were seen between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This was the first study to look at BW as an intervention in persons with MS. Based on its feasibility, safety, and significant finding, BW should be studied in a larger, definitive trial in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010109/pdf/i1537-2073-25-2-45.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:后退行走(BW)干预措施改善了中风、脑瘫和帕金森病患者的步态和平衡,但尚未对多发性硬化症患者进行研究。我们研究了BW干预的可行性,以及它如何影响MS患者的力量、平衡和步态与前向行走(FW)。参与者在跑步机上进行30分钟的FW或BW,每周3次,持续8周(24次就诊)。对入组、依从率和安全性进行了跟踪。计时上下测试、六步测试、单腿站立和缩写的特定活动平衡信心量表用于测量平衡。测量髋关节和膝关节屈伸强度(等长峰值扭矩)、步态速度和时空步态参数。协方差的2×2因子多变量分析用于检查力量、平衡和步态的变化,PDDS量表得分作为协变量。结果:治疗依从性为99.7%,无安全隐患。在控制了残疾的基线差异(PDDS量表评分;P=0.041)后,与FW组相比,BW组在干预前和干预后的主要髋关节屈曲力量有所改善(F1,13=9.03;P=0.010)。两组之间没有其他显著差异。结论:这是第一项将BW作为多发性硬化症患者干预措施的研究。基于其可行性、安全性和重要发现,未来应在更大规模、更明确的试验中对BW进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Backward and Forward Walking on Lower Limb Strength, Balance, and Gait in Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Feasibility Trial.

Background: Backward walking (BW) interventions have improved gait and balance in persons with stroke, cerebral palsy, and Parkinson disease but have not been studied in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). We examined the feasibility of a BW intervention and how it affected strength, balance, and gait vs forward walking (FW) in persons with MS.

Methods: Sixteen persons with MS with a Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale score of 3 to 5 (gait impairment-late cane) were randomized to the FW (n = 8) or BW (n = 8) group. Participants did 30 minutes of FW or BW on a treadmill 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 visits). Enrollment, adherence rate, and safety were tracked. The Timed Up and Go test, Six-Spot Step Test, single-leg stance, and abbreviated Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale were used to measure balance. Hip and knee flexion and extension strength (isometric peak torque), gait speed, and spatiotemporal gait parameters were measured. A 2×2 factorial multivariate analysis of covariance was used to examine changes in strength, balance, and gait, with the PDDS scale score as the covariate.

Results: Treatment adherence rate was 99.7%, with no safety concerns. After controlling for baseline differences in disability (PDDS scale score; P = .041), the BW group improved dominant hip flexion strength preintervention to postintervention compared with the FW group (F 1,13 = 9.03; P = .010). No other significant differences were seen between groups.

Conclusions: This was the first study to look at BW as an intervention in persons with MS. Based on its feasibility, safety, and significant finding, BW should be studied in a larger, definitive trial in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1