有限对策中的均衡辨识与选择

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 Engineering Military Operations Research Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1287/opre.2022.2413
Tobias Crönert, S. Minner
{"title":"有限对策中的均衡辨识与选择","authors":"Tobias Crönert, S. Minner","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision-making under simultaneous competition Hardly any decision is made in isolation and most decision makers are dealing with fierce competition when trying to find the optimal decision for their problem. The expected outcome of such a competitive problem setting or the individually optimal course of action for each competitor is not evident. In a finite game, a finite set of decision makers simultaneously select their action from a finite set of strategies. In “Equilibrium identification and selection in finite games”, T. Crönert and S. Minner propose a solution approach enumerating all equilibria and selecting the most likely equilibrium in finite games. The approach is targeted toward large finite games that cannot be efficiently represented in normal form. They apply their algorithm to two- and three-player knapsack and facility location and design games. Their numerical experiments show that prior approaches identifying a single equilibrium can result in unlikely outcomes.","PeriodicalId":49809,"journal":{"name":"Military Operations Research","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equilibrium Identification and Selection in Finite Games\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Crönert, S. Minner\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/opre.2022.2413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision-making under simultaneous competition Hardly any decision is made in isolation and most decision makers are dealing with fierce competition when trying to find the optimal decision for their problem. The expected outcome of such a competitive problem setting or the individually optimal course of action for each competitor is not evident. In a finite game, a finite set of decision makers simultaneously select their action from a finite set of strategies. In “Equilibrium identification and selection in finite games”, T. Crönert and S. Minner propose a solution approach enumerating all equilibria and selecting the most likely equilibrium in finite games. The approach is targeted toward large finite games that cannot be efficiently represented in normal form. They apply their algorithm to two- and three-player knapsack and facility location and design games. Their numerical experiments show that prior approaches identifying a single equilibrium can result in unlikely outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2413\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2413","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

几乎没有任何决策是孤立地做出的,大多数决策者在寻求问题的最优决策时都面临着激烈的竞争。这种竞争性问题设置的预期结果或每个竞争者的个人最佳行动方案并不明显。在有限博弈中,有限组决策者同时从有限组策略中选择他们的行动。在“有限博弈中的均衡识别和选择”中,T. Crönert和S. Minner提出了一种枚举有限博弈中所有均衡并选择最可能均衡的解决方法。该方法针对的是无法以正常形式有效表示的大型有限博弈。他们将自己的算法应用到双人和三人背包和设施定位和设计游戏中。他们的数值实验表明,先前确定单一平衡的方法可能导致不太可能的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equilibrium Identification and Selection in Finite Games
Decision-making under simultaneous competition Hardly any decision is made in isolation and most decision makers are dealing with fierce competition when trying to find the optimal decision for their problem. The expected outcome of such a competitive problem setting or the individually optimal course of action for each competitor is not evident. In a finite game, a finite set of decision makers simultaneously select their action from a finite set of strategies. In “Equilibrium identification and selection in finite games”, T. Crönert and S. Minner propose a solution approach enumerating all equilibria and selecting the most likely equilibrium in finite games. The approach is targeted toward large finite games that cannot be efficiently represented in normal form. They apply their algorithm to two- and three-player knapsack and facility location and design games. Their numerical experiments show that prior approaches identifying a single equilibrium can result in unlikely outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Military Operations Research
Military Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Operations Research is a peer-reviewed journal of high academic quality. The Journal publishes articles that describe operations research (OR) methodologies and theories used in key military and national security applications. Of particular interest are papers that present: Case studies showing innovative OR applications Apply OR to major policy issues Introduce interesting new problems areas Highlight education issues Document the history of military and national security OR.
期刊最新文献
Optimal Routing Under Demand Surges: The Value of Future Arrival Rates Demand Estimation Under Uncertain Consideration Sets Optimal Routing to Parallel Servers in Heavy Traffic The When and How of Delegated Search A Data-Driven Approach to Beating SAA Out of Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1